OBJECTIVES: Psoriatic arthritis (PsA), is a complex inflammatory arthropathy with a heterogenous spectrum of disease presentation. Despite the vast therapeutic armamentarium, disease control in a considerable proportion of patients is suboptimal. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi), in the management of key clinical domains of PsA including peripheral arthritis, psoriasis, enthesitis and dactylitis.
METHOD: Randomized placebo-controlled trials (RCTs) of JAKi in PsA were identified by a systematic literature search using EMBASE, PubMed and CENTRAL. All included studies underwent meta-analysis.
RESULTS: A total of 5 RCTs were included. Patients were randomized to tofacitinib (n = 474), filgotinib (n = 65), upadacitinib (n = 1281) or placebo (n = 937). JAKi treatment was associated with superior efficacy across all primary outcome measures vs placebo: American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 (risk ratio [RR] 2.10, [95% CI 1.86-2.37], P < .00001, I2 = 19%); ACR 50 (RR 3.43, [95% CI 2.37-4.96], P < .00001, I2 = 66%); ACR 70 (RR 4.57, [95% CI 1.83-11.44], P = .001, I2 = 82%); Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 75 (RR 2.96, [95% CI 2.44-3.58], P < .00001, I2 = 0%); enthesitis resolution (RR 1.82, [95% CI 1.56-2.12], P < .00001, I2 = 0%); and dactylitis resolution (RR 1.85, [95% CI 1.57-2.16], P < .00001, I2 = 0%). JAKi were associated with an overall increased risk of adverse events (RR 1.14, [95% CI 1.07-1.21], P = .0001, I2 = 0%) with increased risk of infection (RR1.23, [95% CI 1.08-1.39], P = .001, I2 = 0%) vs placebo.
CONCLUSION: This pooled analysis demonstrates the efficacy of JAKi in treating key clinical domains of PsA. However, they are associated with an increased risk of adverse events, including infection. Further studies are required to corroborate these findings and further elucidate the safety profile.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Recent studies raise concern for increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) with Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) used to treat immune-mediated inflammatory disorders (IMIDs). We aimed to examine MACE risk with licensed biologics and small molecules used commonly between IMIDs: inflammatory bowel disease, rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis/psoriatic arthritis, and ankylosing spondylitis.
METHODS: Data were obtained from systematic searches (from inception to May 31, 2022) in PubMed, Embase, Ovid Medline, Scopus, Cochrane Central, and Clinicaltrials.gov. Studies that assessed a pre-defined MACE (myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accident, unstable angina, cardiovascular death, or heart failure) risk in those ≥18 years with IMIDs treated with anti-interleukin (IL)-23 antibodies, anti-IL-12/23, anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha antibodies (anti-TNF-α) or JAKi were included in a network meta-analysis using a random-effects model with pooled odds ratios (ORs) reported with 95% credible intervals (CrIs) by drug class and disease state.
RESULTS: Among 3,528 studies identified, 40 (36 randomized controlled trials [RCTs] and 4 cohort studies) were included in the systematic review, comprising 126,961 patients with IMIDs. Based on network meta-analysis of RCTs, regardless of disease state, anti-TNF-α (OR, 2.49; CrI: 1.14-5.62), JAKi (OR, 2.64; CrI: 1.26-5.99), and anti-IL-12/23 (OR, 3.15; CrI: 1.01-13.35) were associated with increased MACE risk compared with placebo. There was no significant difference in the magnitude of the MACE risk between classes or based on IMID type.
CONCLUSIONS: Anti-IL-12/23, JAKi, and anti-TNF-α were associated with higher risk of MACE compared with placebo. The magnitude of the increased MACE risk was not different by IMID type. These results require confirmation in larger prospective studies.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors (Jakinibs) in the treatment of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis (PsA).
METHODS: Databases including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched for randomized controlled trials on the efficacy and safety of Jakinibs in treating psoriasis and PsA from inception to July 2021. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to estimate pooled relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI).
RESULTS: Seventeen clinical trials (16 publications) comprising 6802 patients were included. All Jakinibs demonstrated significantly higher response rates compared with placebo (ACR20: RR 2.09, 95% CI 1.90-2.30; PASI75: RR 4.03, 95% CI 3.13-5.18). Within the subgroup analysis, the response rates defined by ACR20 were highest for filgotinib (RR 2.40, 95% CI 1.67-3.45), followed by upadacitinib, tofacitinib, and deucravacitinib. The proportion of patients achieving PASI75 response in the tofacitinib 10 mg twice daily group was significantly higher than that in the tofacitinib 5 mg group. Regarding safety, the incidence of adverse events (AEs) was significantly higher for Jakinibs compared with placebo (RR 1.17, 95% CI 1.11-1.23). Of note, a considerable increase in the risk of infections including upper respiratory tract and herpes zoster infection was observed among patients in the treatment group. For tofacitinib, upadacitinib, and filgotiniband, infection was the most prevalent AE. Moreover, AEs in the 10 mg tofacitinib group were higher than those in the 5 mg tofacitinib group.
CONCLUSION: Jakinibs are efficacious interventions for the treatment of psoriasis and PsA, but they are associated with an increased risk of AEs when compared with placebo. The long-term efficacy and safety data require further evaluation. Key Points • This systematic review investigated and compared the efficacy and safety of different Jakinibs including the novel selective TYK2 inhibitors. • Jakinibs are efficacious interventions for the treatment of psoriasis and PsA. • A relatively higher dosing schedule of Jakinibs is associated with increased toxicity.
BACKGROUND: JAK inhibitors are a relatively new class of medications that may be useful in the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis (PsA). The objective of this study was to determine the efficacy of several JAK inhibitors in treating psoriasis and PsA and examine safety concerns.
METHODS: MEDLINE, Cochrane and EMBASE were searched for randomized controlled trials and observational studies comparing any JAK inhibitor to placebo. The primary outcomes were a 75% improvement in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI75) and a 20% improvement in the American College of Rheumatology composite score (ACR20). A secondary outcome was the proportion of patients achieving a "0" or "1" on the static Physician Global Assessment scale. Odds ratios were used to compare the proportion of patients reaching these targets in the max dose intervention group vs. the placebo group. A random effects model was used to account for heterogeneity.
RESULTS: In total, 15 RCTs were included in the study and no observational studies. This encompassed 6757 patients in total. When the results were combined, the calculated odds ratio for PASI75 amongst tofacitinib vs. placebo was OR 14.35 [95%CI 7.65, 26.90], for PASI75 amongst non-tofacitinib JAK inhibitors vs. placebo it was OR 6.42 [95%CI 4.89, 8.43], for ACR20 amongst all JAK inhibitors versus placebo was OR 5.87 [95%CI 4.39, 7.85]. There was no significant difference in prevalence of serious adverse events between intervention and control in any of these studies.
CONCLUSION: JAK inhibitors show promise for safely treating moderate-to-severe psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis.
BACKGROUND: Despite the therapeutic armamentarium for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) has considerably expanded over the last thirty years, additional drugs are needed to improve care of this disease. JAK inhibitors (JAKinhibs) are small molecules able to interfere with the JAK/STAT pathway, involved in the pathogenesis of PsA. Tofacitinib and Upadacitinib were recently approved for the treatment of PsA. Our aim was to assess the efficacy and safety of JAKinhibs for the treatment of PsA.
METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was performed to identify RCTs by electronic search of MEDLINE and EMBASE database until April 2021. RCTs were considered eligible if included only patients with PsA treated with JAKinhibs. The pooled efficacy and safety outcomes were calculated by meta-analysis and expressed as odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Statistical heterogeneity was assessed with the I2 statistic.
RESULTS: Five RCTs for a total of 3293 PsA patients treated with different JAKinhibs or placebo were included (2 phase III studies on Tofacitinib, 1 phase II study on Filgotinib and 2 phase III studies on Upadacitinib). All the studies were judged at low risk of bias according to Cochrane criteria. JAKinhibs showed a significantly higher ACR20 response rate compared to placebo (OR 3.78, 95% CI 2.72-5.24, I^2 = 57%, random effect model).and were associated with a non-statistically significant higher risk of serious adverse events (OR 1.12, 95% CI 0.14-2.82, I^2 = 46%, random effect model).
CONCLUSIONS: This is the first systematic review that performed a comprehensive evaluation of the efficacy and safety of JAKinhibs for PsA in RCTs. Our analysis suggests a statistically significant benefit of JAKinhibs that appear to be effective and safe over placebo for the treatment of PsA.
Background: Adalimumab, golimumab, infliximab, certolizumab, and etanercept are five anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) medicines that have been approved for use in rheumatology. Apart from their well-established therapeutic usefulness, -it is unclear to what extent -they are linked to an increased risk of various side effects. The present meta-analysis was carried out to assess the risk of infection and other side effects after anti-TNF- α for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and ankylosing spondylitis. Methods: We searched PubMed, Cinahl (via Ebsco), Scopus, and Web of Sciences databases for trials comparing anti-TNF medications to placebo or no therapy in adult patients with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, or ankylosing spondylitis from August 2006 to August 2020. A total of 23 articles were used for meta-analysis. The Cochrane Collaboration’s risk of bias tool was used to assess the methodological quality of the included studies. In addition, a random-effects model was used to calculate the pooled odds ratio, and Forest plots were constructed to determine the risk of infections and cancer following the use of anti-TNF treatment. Results: Treatment with anti-TNFα agents resulted in an increase in the risk of serious infections (OR: 1.72, 95% CI: 1.56–1.90, p < 0.00001) and an increase in cancer risk (OR: 1.36, 95% CI: 1.20–1.53, p < 0.00001) whereas the risk of developing tuberculosis was not significantly different with anti-TNFα agents versus those without treatment with anti-TNFα agents (OR: 2.55, 95% CI: 0.40–16.23, p = 0.32) although the number of studies is limited to make a definitive conclusion. The risk of bias of the included studies was unclear to high across most domains, and there was evidence of publication bias for most outcomes. Conclusion: The present meta-analysis suggests an increased risk of infectious adverse events, including overall adverse events and cancer following anti-TNFα treatment, whereas the risk of tuberculosis was not significantly different. Although anti-TNF agents have shown promise to treat inflammatory conditions, their use should be balanced by the risk-benefit ratio as suggested by the meta-analysis.
Background: Psoriasis continues to have unmet needs in its management despite introduction of newer molecules. Monotherapy with these newer agents may not achieve therapeutic goals in all cases, hence necessitating their combinations with other molecules. Improved understanding of newer as well as conventional treatment modalities and experiences in their combinations hence necessitates therapeutic guidelines for their use in psoriasis. Objective: To review the combinations of treatments reported in literature and recommendations for their use based on best current evidence in literature. Methods: A literature review of MEDLINE database for studies evaluating combinations of newer therapies with conventional therapies in psoriasis was done. Newer therapies were identified as biologic disease modifying anti rheumatic drugs and other molecules such as apremilast while conventional therapies included methotrexate, cyclosporine, or retinoids, phototherapy and others. The therapeutic guidelines are proposed with the aim to provide evidenced based approach to combine newer and conventional agents in day-to-day psoriasis management. Findings: Combination of acitretin and narrow band ultraviolet B (NB-UVB)/Psoralen with ultraviolet A (PUVA) achieves faster clearance and allows reduction of dose of the latter. A variable outcome is reported of methotrexate with TNF-α inhibitors vs. TNF-α inhibitors alone, although addition of methotrexate appears to reduce immunogenicity of TNF-α inhibitors thereby preventing formation of anti-drug antibodies especially in case of infliximab. While combination of acitretin and PUVA is beneficial, combining TNF-α inhibitors and phototherapy too produces better and faster results but long term risks of Non Melanoma Skin Cancers (NMSCs) may preclude their use together. Combination of cyclosporine and phototherapy is not recommended due to greater chances of NMSCs. Adding phototherapy to Fumaric Acid Esters (FAEs) improves efficacy. Apremilast can be safely combined with available biologic agents in patients with plaque psoriasis or psoriatic arthritis not responding adequately to biologics alone. Hydroxyurea and acitretin may be used together increasing their efficacy and reducing doses of both and hence their adverse effects. Conclusion: Selected clinical scenarios shall benefit from combinations therapies, improving efficacy of both conventional and newer agents and at the same time helping reduce toxicity of higher dosages when used individually.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the association between the use of biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) and the risk of cardiovascular events in patients with systemic inflammatory conditions.
METHODS: Eligible cohort studies or randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from inception to January 2021 were included. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for cardiovascular outcomes were calculated in the fixed- and random-effects model accordingly. Associated factors with risks of cardiovascular events were also studied in sensitivity analyses and metaregression analyses.
RESULTS: Compared with non-bDMARD users, the risks of myocardial infarction (MI) (OR = 0.74, 95% CI, 0.63 to 0.87), heart failure (OR = 0.84, 95% CI, 0.74 to 0.95), cardiovascular (CV) death (OR = 0.62, 95% CI, 0.40 to 0.95), all-cause mortality (OR = 0.64, 95% CI, 0.58 to 0.70), and 3P-MACE (composite endpoint of MI, stroke, and CV death) (OR = 0.69, 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.89) were significantly reduced in bDMARD users, which were mainly driven by the risk reduction in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). TNF-α inhibitors exhibited consistent benefits in reducing the risks of MI, heart failure, CV death, all-cause mortality, and 3P-MACE. Moreover, the risks of heart failure, CV death, all-cause mortality, and 3P-MACE were significantly reduced in bDMARD users with follow-up over one year.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of bDMARDs might be associated with the reduced risks of CV events, especially in patients with RA. The CV events might be less frequent in bDMARD users with TNF-α inhibitors or follow-up over one year. More investigations are needed to validate conclusions.
WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of interleukin-17 inhibitors (ixekizumab, secukinumab, bimekizumab, netakimab and brodalumab) in chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases, including ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA).
METHODS: A comprehensive search for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating efficacy and safety of interleukin-17 inhibitors was performed through PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library databases. Quality assessment was performed using the Cochrane Collaboration risk of bias tool. Data were pooled using the fixed or random-effects models.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Twenty RCTs were identified: of these 9 studies on patients with AS and 11 studies on patients with PsA. Concerning clinical efficacy, a pooled analysis showed interleukin-17 inhibitors had a higher response rate for the primary endpoint (p < 0.05) and secondary endpoint (p < 0.05) at the treatment endpoint for AS/PsA patients. Moreover, an increased risk of treatment-emergent adverse events and infection was found in AS patients (p < 0.05). In contrast, no increased risk of any adverse events was reported in PsA patients.
WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: In this meta-analysis, our findings found interleukin-17 inhibitors had a significant clinical benefit in the management of AS/PsA patients.
GOALS AND BACKGROUND: Ustekinumab (UST) is a monoclonal antibody inhibitor of IL-12/IL-23 approved for the treatment of Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). We conducted a meta-analysis to compare rates of adverse events (AEs) in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of UST for all indications.
STUDY: A systematic search was performed of MEDLINE, Embase, and PubMed databases through November 2019. Study inclusion included RCTs comparing UST to placebo or other biologics in patients aged 18 years or older with a diagnosis of an autoimmune condition.
RESULTS: Thirty RCTs with 16,068 patients were included in our analysis. Nine thousand six hundred and twenty-six subjects were included in the UST vs placebo analysis. There was no significant difference in serious or mild/moderate AEs between UST and placebo with an OR of 0.83 (95% CI 0.66, 1.05) and 1.08 (95% CI 0.99, 1.18), respectively, over a median follow-up time of 16 weeks. In a sub-analysis of CD and UC trials, no difference in serious or mild/moderate AEs in UST versus placebo was seen.
CONCLUSIONS: UST was not associated with an increase in short-term risk of AEs.
Psoriatic arthritis (PsA), is a complex inflammatory arthropathy with a heterogenous spectrum of disease presentation. Despite the vast therapeutic armamentarium, disease control in a considerable proportion of patients is suboptimal. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi), in the management of key clinical domains of PsA including peripheral arthritis, psoriasis, enthesitis and dactylitis.
METHOD:
Randomized placebo-controlled trials (RCTs) of JAKi in PsA were identified by a systematic literature search using EMBASE, PubMed and CENTRAL. All included studies underwent meta-analysis.
RESULTS:
A total of 5 RCTs were included. Patients were randomized to tofacitinib (n = 474), filgotinib (n = 65), upadacitinib (n = 1281) or placebo (n = 937). JAKi treatment was associated with superior efficacy across all primary outcome measures vs placebo: American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 (risk ratio [RR] 2.10, [95% CI 1.86-2.37], P < .00001, I2 = 19%); ACR 50 (RR 3.43, [95% CI 2.37-4.96], P < .00001, I2 = 66%); ACR 70 (RR 4.57, [95% CI 1.83-11.44], P = .001, I2 = 82%); Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 75 (RR 2.96, [95% CI 2.44-3.58], P < .00001, I2 = 0%); enthesitis resolution (RR 1.82, [95% CI 1.56-2.12], P < .00001, I2 = 0%); and dactylitis resolution (RR 1.85, [95% CI 1.57-2.16], P < .00001, I2 = 0%). JAKi were associated with an overall increased risk of adverse events (RR 1.14, [95% CI 1.07-1.21], P = .0001, I2 = 0%) with increased risk of infection (RR1.23, [95% CI 1.08-1.39], P = .001, I2 = 0%) vs placebo.
CONCLUSION:
This pooled analysis demonstrates the efficacy of JAKi in treating key clinical domains of PsA. However, they are associated with an increased risk of adverse events, including infection. Further studies are required to corroborate these findings and further elucidate the safety profile.
