Estudios primarios incluidos en esta revisión sistemática

loading
154 articles (154 Referencias) loading Revertir Estudificar

Estudio primario

No clasificado

S1152 Early Infliximab Infusion in Hospitalized Severe UC Patients: One Year Outcome

Revista Gastroenterology
Año
Enlaces DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0016-5085(09)60901-X

Este artículo está incluido en 1 Revisión sistemática Revisiones sistemáticas (1 referencia)

Cargando información sobre las referencias

Estudio primario

No clasificado

A panel to predict long-term outcome of infliximab therapy for patients with ulcerative colitis.

Revista Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association
Año 2015
Enlaces Pubmed DOI

Este artículo está incluido en 1 Revisión sistemática Revisiones sistemáticas (1 referencia)

Cargando información sobre las referencias
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Infliximab is effective for patients with refractory ulcerative colitis (UC), but few factors have been identified that predict long-term outcome of therapy. We aimed to identify a panel of markers associated with outcome of infliximab therapy to help physicians make personalized treatment decisions. METHODS: We collected data from the first 285 patients with refractory UC (41% female; median age, 39 y) treated with infliximab before July 2012 at University Hospitals Leuven, in Belgium. We performed a Cox regression analysis to identify independent factors that predicted relapse-free and colectomy-free survival, and used these factors to create a panel of markers (risk panel). RESULTS: During a median follow-up period of 5 years, 61% of patients relapsed and 20% required colectomy. Independent predictors of relapse-free survival included short-term complete clinical response (odds ratio [OR], 3.75; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.35-5.97; P < .001), mucosal healing (OR, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.17-2.98; P = .009), and absence of atypical perinuclear antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (pANCA) (OR, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.23-3.12; P = .005). Independent predictors of colectomy-free survival included short-term clinical response (OR, 7.74; 95% CI, 2.76-21.68; P < .001), mucosal healing (OR, 4.02; 95% CI, 1.16-13.97; P = .028), baseline level of C-reactive protein (CRP) of 5 mg/L or less (OR, 2.95; 95% CI, 1.26-6.89; P = .012), and baseline level of albumin of 35 g/L or greater (OR, 3.03; 95% CI, 1.12-8.22; P = .029). Based on serologic analysis of a subgroup of 112 patients, levels of infliximab greater than 2.5 μg/mL at week 14 of treatment predicted relapse-free survival (P < .001) and colectomy-free survival (P = .034). A risk panel that included levels of pANCA, CRP, albumin, clinical response, and mucosal healing identified patients at risk for UC relapse or colectomy (both P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Clinical response and mucosal healing were confirmed as independent predictors of long-term outcome from infliximab therapy in patients with UC. We identified additional factors (levels of pANCA, CRP, and albumin) to create a risk panel that predicts long-term outcomes of therapy. Serum levels of infliximab at week 14 of treatment also were associated with patient outcomes. Our risk panel and short-term serum levels of infliximab therefore might be used to guide therapy.

Estudio primario

No clasificado

Real-life outcome of anti-tumor necrosis factor α in the ambulatory treatment of ulcerative colitis.

Revista World journal of gastroenterology
Año 2015
Enlaces Pubmed DOI PubMed Central

Este artículo está incluido en 1 Revisión sistemática Revisiones sistemáticas (1 referencia)

Cargando información sobre las referencias
AIM: To evaluate the outcome of anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (anti-TNFα) therapy in outpatients with ulcerative colitis at a tertiary referral center. METHODS: All patients with a confirmed diagnosis of ulcerative colitis undergoing therapy with infliximab and/or adalimumab at the outpatient clinic for inflammatory bowel diseases at the University Hospital Heidelberg between January 2011 and February 2014 were retrospectively enrolled. Patients with a follow-up period of less than 6 mo from start of anti-TNFα therapy were excluded. Medical records of all eligible individuals were carefully reviewed. Steroid-free clinical remission of a duration of at least 3 mo, colectomy rate, duration of anti-TNFα therapy, need for anti-TNFα dose escalation, and the occurrence of adverse events were evaluated as the main outcome parameters. RESULTS: Seventy-two patients were included (35 treated with infliximab, 17 with adalimumab, 20 with both consecutively). Median follow-up was 27 mo (range: 6-87 mo). Steroid-free clinical remission was achieved by 22.2% of the patients (median duration: 21 mo until end of follow-up; range: 3-66 mo). Patients attaining steroid-free clinical remission displayed lower hemoglobin and albumin blood levels at the start of treatment than those who did not achieve remission. The overall colectomy rate was 20.8%. Nearly 50% of the patients underwent anti-TNFα dose escalation during the follow-up period. For both the infliximab and the adalimumab treated patients, non-response to anti-TNFα therapy was the major reason for treatment discontinuation. 18.2% of the infliximab-treated patients and 13.5% of the adalimumab-treated patients had to discontinue their therapy due to adverse events. CONCLUSION: Real-life remission rates of ulcerative colitis under anti-TNFα are overall low, but some patients have a clear long-term benefit.

Estudio primario

No clasificado

An accelerated infliximab induction regimen reduces the need for early colectomy in patients with acute severe ulcerative colitis.

Revista Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association
Año 2015
Enlaces Pubmed DOI

Este artículo está incluido en 1 Revisión sistemática Revisiones sistemáticas (1 referencia)

Cargando información sobre las referencias
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Administration of infliximab to patients with acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) (rescue therapy) can reduce the rate of early colectomy (within 12 months), but long-term rates of colectomy are the same as those of the pre-biologic era for these patients. The half-life of infliximab is shorter in patients with ASUC than in patients with non-severe UC, so more frequent dosing might be required to produce a therapeutic effect. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 50 hospitalized patients who received infliximab for steroid-refractory ASUC at a single academic center from September 2005 through 2013. In 2011 an accelerated dosing strategy for infliximab was introduced; we compared outcomes of standard and accelerated dosing regimens. One group of patients (n = 35) were placed on a standard dosing regimen for infliximab and then given the drug at 0, 2, and 6 weeks and then every 8 weeks thereafter. A second group (n = 15) were placed on an accelerated regimen and received 3 induction doses of infliximab within a median period of 24 days. Rates of colectomy were compared between the groups during induction and follow-up periods. RESULTS: There were no differences between groups in median baseline levels of C-reactive protein, albumin, or hemoglobin. The rate of colectomy during induction therapy was significantly lower with the accelerated regimen (6.7%, 1 of 15) than with the standard regimen (40%, 14 of 35) (Fisher exact test, P = .039). The standard regimen was associated with shorter time to colectomy (log-rank test, P = .042). Among patients who completed induction therapy, subsequent need for colectomy was similar between the groups during the follow-up period. Multivariate analysis showed that factors independently associated with successful induction therapy were level of albumin (g/L) when the treatment began (P = .003) and the accelerated dosing regimen (P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with ASUC, an accelerated infliximab induction strategy reduces the need for early colectomy. An intensified infliximab dosing strategy in response to clinical or laboratory signs of breakthrough inflammation merits consideration in prospective studies.

Estudio primario

No clasificado

P541. Long-term colectomy rates in patients with Ulcerative Colitis treated with Infliximab: A single Canadian tertiary care centre’s experience

Autores [No se listan los autores]
Revista Journal of Crohn's and Colitis
Año 2015
Enlaces http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ecco-jcc/jju027.659

Este artículo está incluido en 1 Revisión sistemática Revisiones sistemáticas (1 referencia)

Cargando información sobre las referencias

Estudio primario

No clasificado

Extent of Early Clinical Response to Infliximab Predicts Long-term Treatment Success in Active Ulcerative Colitis.

Revista Inflammatory bowel diseases
Año 2015
Enlaces Pubmed DOI

Este artículo está incluido en 1 Revisión sistemática Revisiones sistemáticas (1 referencia)

Cargando información sobre las referencias
BACKGROUND: The long-term effectiveness of infliximab (IFX) in ulcerative colitis (UC) and predictors of treatment response remain poorly characterized. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted in 213 consecutive patients with active steroid-refractory or steroid-dependent UC treated with induction and scheduled maintenance IFX at an inflammatory bowel disease referral center. Outcomes included annual steroid-free remission (SFR), IFX failure with discontinuation, colectomy, and serious adverse events. RESULTS: The 1- and 5-year cumulative probabilities for SFR were 39% and 14%, for IFX failure were 31.7% and 55.6%, and for colectomy were 19.2% and 37.4%, respectively. A sensitivity analysis considering the last clinical observation in patients with incomplete follow-up demonstrated a long-term SFR rate of 36%. Among responders to IFX induction therapy, achieving clinical remission before maintenance IFX therapy predicted SFR at 1 year (adjusted odds ratio = 4.50; 95% CI, 1.75-11.53), whereas the need for IFX dose intensification during the first year of therapy predicted a lower odds of SFR at 1 year (adjusted odds ratio = 0.28; 95% CI, 0.11-0.67) and a greater hazard of IFX failure beyond 1 year (adjusted hazard ratio = 2.57; 95% CI, 1.14-5.81). Older age and shorter UC duration at IFX initiation predicted poorer long-term outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with moderate-to-severe UC treated with scheduled IFX at an inflammatory bowel disease center, close to half of the patients are still on IFX at 5 years, although a smaller proportion of patients achieve long-term SFR. The magnitude and stability of early response to IFX is associated with long-term therapeutic benefit to this agent.

Estudio primario

No clasificado

Infliximab Dose Escalation as an Effective Strategy for Managing Secondary Loss of Response in Ulcerative Colitis.

Revista Digestive diseases and sciences
Año 2015
Enlaces Pubmed DOI

Este artículo está incluido en 1 Revisión sistemática Revisiones sistemáticas (1 referencia)

Cargando información sobre las referencias
BACKGROUND: The outcomes of infliximab dose escalation in ulcerative colitis (UC) have not been well evaluated. AIMS: To assess the short- and long-term outcomes of infliximab dose escalation in a cohort of patients with UC. METHODS: This was a multicenter, retrospective, cohort study. All consecutive UC patients who had lost response to infliximab maintenance infusions and who underwent infliximab dose escalation were included. Post-escalation short-term clinical response and remission were evaluated. In the long term, the cumulative probabilities of infliximab failure-free survival and colectomy-free survival were calculated. Predictors of short-term response and event-free survival were estimated using logistic regression analysis and Cox proportional hazard regression analysis. RESULTS: Seventy-nine patients were included. Fifty-four patients (68.4%) achieved short-term clinical response and 41 patients (51.9%) entered in clinical remission. After a median follow-up of 15 months [interquartile range (IQR) 8-26], 33 patients (41.8%) had infliximab failure. Patients with short-term response had a significantly lower adjusted rate of infliximab failure [hazard ratio (HR) 0.24, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.12-0.49; p < 0.001]. During a median follow-up of 24 months (IQR 13-34), 9 patients (11.4%) needed colectomy. Short-term response was identified as a predictor of colectomy avoidance (HR 0.14; 95% CI 0.03-0.69; p < 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: In UC patients who lost response to infliximab during maintenance, infliximab dose escalation enabled recovery of short-term response in nearly 70% of patients. In the long term, 58% of patients maintained sustained clinical benefit, and 9 of 10 avoided colectomy. Short-term response was associated with an 86% reduction in the relative risk of colectomy.

Estudio primario

No clasificado

Infliximab versus Cyclosporine Treatment for Severe Corticosteroid-Refractory Ulcerative Colitis: A Korean, Retrospective, Single Center Study.

Autores Kim EH , Kim DH , Park SJ , Hong SP , Kim TI , Kim WH , Cheon JH
Revista Gut and liver
Año 2015
Enlaces Pubmed DOI PubMed Central

Este artículo está incluido en 2 Revisiones sistemáticas Revisiones sistemáticas (2 referencias)

Cargando información sobre las referencias
BACKGROUND/AIMS: In patients with corticosteroid-refractory ulcerative colitis (UC), cyclosporine or infliximab may be added to the treatment regimen to induce remission. Here, we aimed to compare the efficacy of cyclosporine and infliximab. METHODS: Between January 1995 and May 2012, the medical records of 43 patients with corticosteroid-refractory UC who received either infliximab or cyclosporine as a rescue therapy at a tertiary care hospital in Korea were reviewed. RESULTS: Among the 43 patients, 10 underwent rescue therapy with cyclosporine and the remaining 33 patients received infliximab. A follow-up of 12 months was completed for all patients. The colectomy rate at 12 months was 30% and 3% in the cyclosporine and the infliximab groups, respectively (p=0.034). However, the Cox proportional hazard model indicated that the treatment of rescue therapy was not an independent associate factor for preventing colectomy (p=0.164). In the subgroup analysis, infliximab with azathioprine was superior to cyclosporine for preventing colectomy (hazard ratio of infliximab with azathioprine compared with cyclosporine only, 0.073; 95% confidence interval, 0.008 to 0.629). CONCLUSIONS: No difference between infliximab and cyclosporine with respect to preventing colectomy was noted. However, infliximab with azathioprine may be more effective than cyclosporine alone for preventing colectomy.

Estudio primario

No clasificado

The effect of infliximab on patients with ulcerative colitis in Korea.

Autores Seo HI , Park DI , Kim TO , Kim YS , Lee SH , Kim JW , Kim JH , Shin JE
Revista Intestinal research
Año 2014
Enlaces Pubmed DOI PubMed Central

Este artículo está incluido en 1 Revisión sistemática Revisiones sistemáticas (1 referencia)

Cargando información sobre las referencias
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Infliximab was introduced recently as a rescue therapy for ulcerative colitis (UC) patients refractory to conventional treatments such as therapy with 5-amiono salicylic acids (5-ASA), immune modulators, and corticosteroids. However, there is insufficient data about its efficacy and safety in Korea. METHODS: From 7 tertiary referral hospitals, 33 patients who were treated with infliximab for moderate to severe (Mayo score 6-12) UC refractory to conventional treatment were recruited to this study. Clinical remission was defined as a total Mayo score of 2 or lower and every subscore less than 2. Partial response was defined as a decrease of Mayo score at least 3 points from baseline. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients (69.7%) showed clinical remission and 29 patients (87.8%) showed partial response in the observation period. When the remission and non-remission groups were compared in univariate analysis, only a higher total Mayo score at base line (11.0±0.9 vs. 9.9±1.5; P=0.04) was related to remission. The remission maintenance rate decreased with time in the Kaplan-Meier analysis. Two patients experienced re-remission after the first remission followed by aggravation during infliximab treatment. Three patients stopped infliximab treatment owing to adverse events including rhabdomyolysis, pneumonia, and fever of unknown origin. CONCLUSIONS: If there is no choice except surgery for UC patients refractory to conventional treatment, infliximab is an effective and relatively safe treatment option for these patients in Korea.