Revisión sistemática
No clasificado
Background: Chronic hepatitis B infection can lead to liver failure, hepatocellular carcinoma, and death. Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness of antiviral therapy for adults with chronic hepatitis B infection. Data Sources: Randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) of interferon (α2b and pegylated α2a), lamivudine, adefovir, entecavir, and telbivudine published from 1990 to 2008. Study Selection: Randomized, controlled clinical trials of adults with chronic hepatitis B published in English after 1989 that reported death; incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma or liver failure; prevalence and incidence of cirrhosis; presence or seroconversion of hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) or surface antigen (HBsAg), viral load of hepatitis B virus DNA; aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels; or fibrosis scores after therapy with interferon-α2b, pegylated interferon-α2a, lamivudine, adefovir, entecavir, and telbivudine. Data Extraction: Data extracted with standard protocols to calculate risk difference for clinical outcomes, viral load, HBeAg and HBsAg, ALT, histologic scores, and adverse events. Data Synthesis: In 16 RCTs (4431 patients), drug treatment did not improve clinical outcomes of chronic hepatitis B infection, but the trials were underpowered. In 60 RCTs that examined intermediate outcomes, no single treatment improved all intermediate outcomes. Low-quality evidence suggested HBsAg clearance after interferon-α2b (2 RCTs; 211 patients). Moderate-quality evidence suggested ALT normalization at follow-up after treatment with adefovir (2 RCTs; 600 patients) and HBeAg loss with lamivudine (2 RCTs; 318 patients). With interferon-α2b, moderate-quality evidence suggested HBeAg loss (3 RCTs; 351 patients), seroconversion (2 RCTs; 304 patients), and ALT normalization (2 RCTs; 131 patients). Pegylated interferon-α2a versus lamivudine improved HBeAg seroconversion (1 RCT; 814 patients) and ALT normalization (2 RCTs; 905 patients) off treatment. Pegylated interferon-α2a combined with lamivudine versus lamivudine improved HBeAg loss (1 RCT; 543 patients) and ALT normalization (2 RCTs; 905 patients). Adverse events during antiretroviral therapy occurred in more than 50% of patients but were not associated with increased treatment discontinuation. However, most studies excluded patients with hepatic or renal insufficiency or other serious comorbid conditions. Limitation: Marked heterogeneity in study samples, interventions, and measured outcomes preclude definitive conclusions. Conclusion: Evidence was insufficient to assess treatment effect on clinical outcomes or determine whether inconsistent improvements in selected intermediate measures are reliable surrogates. Future research is needed to provide evidence-based recommendations about optimal antiviral therapy in adults with chronic hepatitis B infection. © 2009 American College of Physicians.
Estudio primario
No clasificado
Revisión sistemática
No clasificado
Background The optimal oral anti-viral agent to use in patients with decompensated HBV cirrhosis remains unclear. Aim We performed a meta-analysis of the oral nucleos(t)ide analogues in patients with decompensated HBV cirrhosis. Methods One year efficacy and safety outcomes in 22 studies published in English between95 and 2010 were analysed. Results Substantial heterogeneity was noted in the inclusion/exclusion criteria, controls, and sensitivity of the HBV DNA assay used. Pooled 1-year data showed benefit favouring lamivudine (LAM) vs. untreated controls for Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) score improvement by ≥2 (OR: 117 (15 921), P ≤ 0.0001) and transplant-free survival (OR: 3.2 (1.2, 9), P = 0.022). Adefovir (ADV) led to undetectable HBV DNA at 1-year in 41% compared to 83% with LAM and 80% with entecavir (ETV). Overall, 1-year transplant-free survival rates varied from 78% with LAM to 95% and 94% with Tenofovir (TDF) and Telbivudine (TBV), respectively. The 1-year incidence of drug resistant HBV was 0% with ADV, ETV and TDF and 11% with LAM although TBV was associated with a 29% incidence at 2 years. Drug-related adverse events were infrequently reported. Conclusions All the oral anti-viral agents were associated with improved virological, biochemical and clinical parameters at 1-year. However, the efficacy of lamivudine and telbivudine is limited by drug resistance, and adefovir is limited by its potency and slower onset of action. Additional studies of tenofovir and entecavir are needed to determine the optimal agent(s) for treatment nave patients and in those with drug-resistant decompensated HBV cirrhosis. © 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Revisión sistemática
No clasificado
Se analizó la evidencia disponible sobre la eficacia y la tolerabilidad de una vez al día la terapia antirretroviral altamente activa (HAART), bases de datos de búsqueda, actas de congresos y revistas. Dos revisores seleccionaron de forma independiente no controlada 6 y 2 ensayos clínicos aleatorios de al menos 24 semanas de duración y con un 80% el seguimiento de los participantes. Los regímenes incluyen didanosina (ddI), emtricitabina (FTC) y efavirenz (EFV) (2 estudios, 326 pacientes); ddI, lamivudina (3TC) y efavirenz (3 estudios, 147 pacientes); ddI, 3TC, EFV, y adefovir dipivoxil (1 estudio, 11 pacientes); ddI, nevirapina y efavirenz (1 estudio, 15 pacientes) y ddI, 3TC, indinavir y ritonavir (un estudio, 10 pacientes). Eficacia virológica osciló entre 70% y el 91%. Los ensayos clínicos preliminares aleatorios mostraron que una vez al día los regímenes (ddI, 3TC y EFV o ddI, FTC y EFV) tuvo una eficacia virológica, al menos similar a la de la terapia HAART convencional. El aumento de CD4 general celda era por lo menos 114 linfocitos / microL. La tolerabilidad fue buena, con una tasa de abandono baja.
Revisión sistemática
No clasificado
Estudio primario
No clasificado
Estudio primario
No clasificado
Revisión sistemática
No clasificado
Aim: To investigate whether adjuvant antiviral treatment could improve prognosis and entecavir is the optimal nucleoside/nucleotide analog (NA) regimen after curative therapy of hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods: A comprehensive electronic search was performed. All controlled trials comparing antiviral treatment with placebo or no treatment for HBV-related HCC after curative treatment were included. The pooled hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using Stata 12.0 software. An indirect treatment comparison method was used to compare the relative efficacy of different NA strategies. Results: Twenty-one studies containing 8072 patients were included. NA was found to significantly improve recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). Alternatively, for interferon, a non-significant benefit was found. By adjusted indirect comparisons among entecavir, lamivudine and adefovir, entecavir were found to display almost but not significant superiority to the other NA in improving RFS. No tendency favoring a specific NA regimen was found for OS. Conclusion: In HBV-HCC patient after curative treatment, NA improve the prognosis significantly but the role of interferon remains to be elucidated; entecavir was not found to be superior to other NA based on available data. © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Revisión sistemática
No clasificado
Objective. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Kushenin (KS) combined with nucleoside analogues (NAs) for chronic hepatitis B (CHB). Methods. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of KS combined with NAs for CHB were identified through 7 databases. Frequencies of loss of serum HBeAg, HBeAg seroconversion, undetectable serum HBV-DNA, ALT normalization, and adverse events at 48 weeks were abstracted by two reviewers. The Cochrane software was performed to assess the risk of bias in the included trials. Data were analyzed with Review Manager 5.3 software. Results. 18 RCTs involving 1684 subjects with CHB were included in the analysis. KS combined with NAs including lamivudine (LAM), entecavir (ETV), adefovir dipivoxil (ADV), and telbivudine (TLV) showed different degree of improvement in CHB indices. KS combined with NAs increased the frequency of loss of serum HBeAg, HBeAg seroconversion, undetectable HBV-DNA levels, and ALT normalization compared with single agents. It also decreased serum ALT and AST level after one-year treatment. However, KS combined with TLV did not show a significant difference in CHB indices. The side-effects of KS combined with NAs were light and of low frequency. Conclusion. KS combined with NAs improves the efficacy of NAs in CHB.
Estudio primario
No clasificado