Availability of combined tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccines for adults offers a new pertussis prevention strategy for the US. Successful uptake of Tdap vaccine will depend partly on the attitudes and practices of primary care physicians, including their experience with Td boosters. We conducted a mail survey in August 2005 of a national random sample of 399 family physicians (FPs) and 399 general internists (IMs) to assess practices related to Td boosters, clinical experience with pertussis, and attitudes toward a potential Tdap vaccine recommendation for adults. The response rate was 49% (52% FPs, 46% IMs). Among 336 eligible respondents, half reported having clinical experience with pertussis. Most (81%) would recommend Tdap vaccine for their adult patients, and 73% support targeting adults likely to come in close contact with infants. Attitudes toward a potential Tdap vaccine recommendation differed by whether providers stock and administer Td boosters. We conclude that adult primary care providers in the US are likely to recommend Tdap vaccine to their adult patients, in concordance with recent national recommendations. Future research should assess the extent to which barriers impede adoption of Tdap vaccine recommendations.

OBJECTIVE:

To compare the safety and immunogenicity of Lederle Laboratories' (Pearl River, NY) diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and acellular pertussis (DTaP) vaccine with diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and whole-cell pertussis (DTwP) vaccine when administered simultaneously with measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine and trivalent oral poliovirus (OPV) vaccine at 15 to 16 months of age.

DESIGN:

Randomized and double-blind.

SETTING:

Two general pediatric practices.

PARTICIPANTS:

Ninety-seven infants, aged 15 to 16 months, who had received three previous DTwP immunizations.

SELECTION PROCEDURES AND INTERVENTIONS:

Healthy children received the DTaP or DTwP vaccine. Infants received the MMR vaccine at a separate site and the OPV vaccine concurrently. Blood was obtained on day 0 and at 6 weeks. Adverse events were recorded by parents at specified times after immunization.

MEASUREMENTS/RESULTS:

Within 3 days of immunization, DTaP vaccine recipients had less fever, drowsiness, and irritability (P = .01, .04, .01, respectively). They also experienced less tenderness, erythema, and induration (.001, .001, and .002, respectively). There was no difference in the frequency of adverse reactions 6 to 14 days after immunization. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays were used to determine all antibody values. Antibody responses to filamentous hemagglutinin and pertussis toxoid were significantly greater in the DTaP group (P = .0001 and .02, respectively). Immune responses to the other measured antigens were similar.

CONCLUSIONS:

Simultaneous administration of the Lederle DTaP with MMR and OPV vaccines did not interfere with antibody response to pertussis antigens measured or measles, mumps, or rubella viruses and was associated with fewer local and systemic adverse events during the first 3 days following immunization when compared with the simultaneous administration of the DTwP, OPV, and MMR vaccines. We conclude that the DTaP vaccine can be administered at 15 months of age concurrently with the MMR and OPV vaccines.

Objetivo. Evaluar la efectividad de los recordatorios postales individualizados frente a ningún tipo de intervención, para incrementar la tasa de inmunización con vacuna contra tétanos-difteria en la población de entre 24 y 30 años de edad, en un área donde simultáneamente se efectúa una estrategia poblacional general mediante carteles informativos acerca de la vacuna antitetánica. Método. Ensayo clínico, aleatorizado, abierto, con grupos paralelos, en una ABS de 13.523 habitantes, realizado en la población de 24-30 años, durante parte de 2005, con una muestra de 311 pacientes en el grupo control y 311 en el grupo intervenido, tras excluir los bien vacunados según el registro informático de la historia clínica. La intervención que se evalúa es el recordatorio postal acerca de la vacunación antitetánica y su repercusión debida a la intervención sobre la tasa de inmunización. También se recogieron datos sobre: sexo, edad, motivo para haber venido a vacunarse, cumplimiento de horario, si se rehusa la vacuna y si se comprueba que ya estaba bien vacunado previamente. Para el análisis estadístico se utilizaron la t de Student y el test de la x2, con un nivel de confianza del 95% (p < 0,05). Resultados. La cobertura vacunal poblacional a finales de 2005 ha sido del 75,6%. Tras el recordatorio postal estaba bien vacunado un 22,2% del grupo control y un 40,5% del grupo intervenido. Conclusiones. El recordatorio postal individualizado a la población de 24 a 30 años de esta área de salud es efectivo para incrementar la tasa de inmunización en este grupo de edad, y la realización periódica puede asegurar una continuidad en la vacunación de la población adulta

<b>Importance: </b>Maternal immunization with tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccine could prevent infant pertussis.<b>

OBJECTIVE:

</b>To evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of Tdap immunization during pregnancy and its effect on infant responses to diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and acellular pertussis (DTaP) vaccine.<b>Design, Setting, and Participants: </b>Phase 1-2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical trial conducted from 2008 to 2012. Forty-eight pregnant women aged 18 to 45 years received Tdap (n = 33) or placebo (n = 15) at 30 to 32 weeks' gestation, with crossover immunization postpartum.<b>

INTERVENTIONS:

</b>Tdap vaccination at 30 to 32 weeks' gestation or postpartum.<b>Main Outcomes and Measures: </b>Primary outcomes were maternal and infant adverse events, pertussis illness, and infant growth and development until age 13 months. Secondary outcomes were antibody concentrations in pregnant women before and 4 weeks after Tdap immunization or placebo, at delivery and 2 months' postpartum, and in infants at birth, at 2 months, and after the third and fourth doses of DTaP.<b>

RESULTS:

</b>No Tdap-associated serious adverse events occurred in women or infants. Injection site reactions after Tdap immunization were reported in 26 (78.8% [95% CI, 61.1%-91.0%]) and 12 (80% [95% CI, 51.9%-95.7%]) pregnant and postpartum women, respectively (P > .99). Systemic symptoms were reported in 12 (36.4% [ 95% CI, 20.4%-54.9%]) and 11 (73.3% [95% CI, 44.9%-92.2%]) pregnant and postpartum women, respectively (P = .03). Growth and development were similar in both infant groups. No cases of pertussis occurred. Significantly higher concentrations of pertussis antibodies were measured at delivery in women who received Tdap during pregnancy vs postpartum (eg, pertussis toxin antibodies: 51.0 EU/mL [95% CI, 37.1-70.1] and 9.1 EU/mL [95% CI, 4.6-17.8], respectively; P < .001) and in their infants at birth (68.8 EU/mL [95% CI, 52.1-90.8] and 14.0 EU/mL [95% CI, 7.3-26.9], respectively; P < .001) and at age 2 months (20.6 EU/mL [95% CI, 14.4-29.6] and 5.3 EU/mL [95% CI, 3.0-9.4], respectively; P < .001). Antibody responses in infants born to women receiving Tdap during pregnancy were not different following the fourth dose of DTaP.<b>Conclusions and Relevance: </b>This preliminary assessment did not find an increased risk of adverse events among women who received Tdap vaccine during pregnancy or their infants. For secondary outcomes, maternal immunization with Tdap resulted in high concentrations of pertussis antibodies in infants during the first 2 months of life and did not substantially alter infant responses to DTaP. Further research is needed to provide definitive evidence of the safety and efficacy of Tdap immunization during pregnancy.<b>Trial Registration: </b>clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00707148.

OBJECTIVE--To compare the immunogenicity and reactogenicity of a two-component acellular pertussis vaccine with a whole-cell diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and pertussis vaccine (W-DTP) when administered as a booster to children 4 through 6 years of age. DESIGN--This was a randomized, double-blind study. SETTING--Children in this study were from three general pediatric practices (two were private, one was university-affiliated). PARTICIPANTS--Three hundred and sixteen 4- through 6-year-old children who had received four previous W-DTP immunizations at the recommended times were studied. SELECTION PROCEDURES AND INTERVENTIONS--Children were randomly assigned in a 1:3 ratio to receive either W-DTP or one of three lots of acellular diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and pertussis vaccine (A-DTP). The A-DTPs contained 3.75 micrograms each of lymphocytosis promoting factor and filamentous hemagglutinin protein nitrogen per 0.5 mL and the same concentrations of diphtheria and tetanus toxoids as W-DTP. Serum samples were obtained on the day of immunization and 4 to 6 weeks later. Adverse reactions were recorded by parents at 6, 24, 48, and 72 hours. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS--An indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) method determined IgG antibody response to lymphocytosis promoting factor, filamentous hemagglutinin, and tetanus toxoid; a CHO cell assay measured neutralizing antibodies to pertussis toxin; and serum neutralization on VERO cells assayed diphtheria antitoxin. One month after booster doses were administered, the geometric mean antibody levels for A-DTP vs W-DTP were IgG filamentous hemagglutinin, 362 vs 104 ELISA U/mL; IgG lymphocytosis promoting factor, 408 vs 81 ELISA U/mL; CHO cell, 210 vs 107; diphtheria, 21.7 vs 12.1 U/mL; and tetanus, 2.86 vs 2.04 Eq/mL. Following immunization with A-DTP, local and systemic adverse experiences were 30% to 50% and 20% to 30% fewer, respectively, as compared with W-DTP. CONCLUSIONS--The BIKEN A-DTP vaccine used in this study demonstrates enhanced immunogenicity to lymphocytosis promoting factor, filamentous hemagglutinin, and other measured antigens and less reactogenicity compared with licensed W-DTP [corrected].

BACKGROUND:

Pneumococcal polysaccharide/protein conjugate vaccines (PnCV) are immunogenic and effective in infancy. However, an addition to the nine currently recommended vaccine injections during the first year of life of African children may be a deterrent to participation in a PnCV program. Thus we have evaluated the safety and immunogenicity of a 9-valent PnCV (Wyeth Lederle Pediatrics and Vaccines) mixed with diphtheria, tetanus toxoid, cell pertussis and type b (TETRAMUNE).

METHODS:

Healthy Gambian infants were randomized at the age of 2 months to receive three doses 1 month apart of either (1) placebo reconstituted in TETRAMUNE in the right thigh (control) or (2) PnCV in the left thigh and TETRAMUNE in the right thigh (separate) or (3) PnCV reconstituted in TETRAMUNE as a single injection in the right thigh (combined). The vaccines were given together with routine Expanded Program on Immunization vaccines. Adverse reactions were recorded after vaccination, and antibody concentrations were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays.

RESULTS:

Local induration and tenderness were observed more commonly at the site of injection of TETRAMUNE than at the site of injection with PnCV after each dose of vaccination. Swelling at the site of injection was encountered more frequently at the site of administration of TETRAMUNE than at the site of administration PnCV ( P< 0.00001 for Doses 1 and 2 and P< 0.0009 for Dose 3). Swelling at the site of administration of TETRAMUNE mixed with PnCV was comparable with that observed for TETRAMUNE alone. Although most mothers reported that the babies "felt hot" 24 h after each injection, febrile reactions (temperature, >or=38 degrees C) were infrequent and resolved with antipyretics. Geometric mean titer for anti-polyribosylribitol phosphate antibody was 11.6 microg/ml [95% confidence limits (95% CI), 9.2, 14.6] in the control group and comparable with 13.3 microg/ml (95% CI 11.0, 16.0) in the combined group and significantly higher at 17.9 microg/ml (95% CI 14.7, 21.9; P= 0.01) in the separate group. Geometric mean concentrations of serotype-specific pneumococcal antibodies were higher in the combined group than the separate group for all nine serotypes. Antibody responses to diphtheria and pertussis antigens were similar in all groups. Anti-tetanus toxoid antibody concentrations were lowest in the combined group (6.66 IU/ml, 95% CI 5.77, 7.68 in the control group; 5.15 IU/ml, 95% CI 4.39, 6.03 in the combined group; P= 0.02). However, all vaccinees achieved protective antibody values.

CONCLUSION:

The combination of TETRAMUNE and PnCV is safe and immunogenic.

A diphtheria and tetanus toxoid two-component acellular pertussis vaccine (DTaP), consisting of 25 micrograms glutaraldehyde-detoxified pertussis toxin (PT) and 25 micrograms native filamentous hemagglutinin (FHA), was compared with diphtheria and tetanus toxoid whole-cell pertussis vaccine (DTwP) in a randomized, double-blind manner in 286 Senegalese infants inoculated at two, four, and six months of age. In infants receiving DTaP a significantly lower rate of local reactions, crying and fever was observed than in infants receiving DTwP. One month after the third dose, the geometric mean titres for FHA antibodies were higher in the DTaP group, whereas increases in PT antibody titres were higher in the DTwP group. More than 90% of the infants had a fourfold or more increase in antibodies to both PT and FHA with either vaccine. Diphtheria, tetanus, and polio antibody responses were also measured and found to be comparable between the two groups. The results of this pilot study support the implementation of a field trial to compare the protective efficacy of these vaccines against pertussis in the same setting.

BACKGROUND:

The frequency of local vaccination reactions increases with successive doses of diphtheria-tetanus toxoids-acellular pertussis (DTaP) vaccine, and local reactions occur for the majority of children receiving the fifth DTaP vaccination. It is not known whether these reactions can be prevented with prophylactic use of acetaminophen or ibuprofen.

METHODS:

In this 3-group, randomized, blinded, controlled trial, 372 children were assigned randomly, in a 2:2:1 ratio, to receive 3 doses of acetaminophen, ibuprofen, or placebo. The first dose of study medication was administered within 2 hours before the fifth DTaP vaccination, and the remaining 2 doses were given at 6-hour intervals. The primary outcome measures included a local reaction with an area of redness or discoloration > or =5 cm in diameter on the evening of or during the 2 days after vaccination, an increase in mid-limb circumference of > or =2 cm on the evening of or during the 2 days after vaccination, and a persistent local reaction, defined as an area of redness or discoloration present on the third day after vaccination.

RESULTS:

Local reactions with a > or =5-cm area of redness or discoloration were reported for 35% of children in the placebo group, compared with 33% of children in the acetaminophen group and 37% of children in the ibuprofen group. There was also no significant difference between the placebo and treatment groups in the proportions of children with a > or =2-cm increase in mid-limb circumference or with a persistent local reaction.

CONCLUSIONS:

We did not find evidence that prophylaxis with acetaminophen or ibuprofen offers a clinically significant benefit in prevention of local reactions to the fifth DTaP vaccination.

BACKGROUND:

Advantages to combining childhood vaccines include reducing the number of visits, injections and patient discomfort, increasing compliance and optimising prevention. The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends that routine infant immunisation programmes include a vaccination against Haemophilus influenzae (H. influenzae) type B (HIB) in the combined diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis (DTP)-hepatitis B virus (HBV) vaccination. The effectiveness and safety of the combined vaccine should be carefully and systematically assessed to ensure its acceptability by the community.

OBJECTIVES:

To compare the effectiveness of combined DTP-HBV-HIB vaccines versus combined DTP-HBV and separate HIB vaccinations.

SEARCH METHODS:

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2011, Issue 4), which contains the Cochrane Acute Respiratory Infections Group's Specialised Register, MEDLINE (January 1966 to week 1, November 2011), EMBASE (January 1990 to November 2011) and www.clinicaltrials.gov (up to April 2011).

SELECTION CRITERIA:

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-RCTs comparing vaccination with any combined DTP-HBV-HIB vaccine, with or without three types of inactivated polio virus (IPV) or concomitant oral polio vaccine (OPV) in any dose, preparation or time schedule, compared with separate vaccines or placebo, administered to infants up to two years old.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS:

Two review authors independently inspected references identified by the searches and evaluated them against the inclusion criteria, extracted data and assessed the methodological quality of included trials.

MAIN RESULTS:

Data for the primary outcome (prevention of disease) were lacking. We performed a meta-analysis to pool the results of 20 studies with 5874 participants in an immunogenicity analysis and 5232 participants in the reactogenicity analysis. There were no data on clinical outcomes for the primary outcome (prevention of disease) and all studies used immunogenicity and reactogenicity (adverse events). The number of vaccine doses differed significantly between the studies. Heterogeneous interventions, study location, healthcare environment and combining research across disparate geographical locations, may have lead to bias. The risk of bias was unclear across most of the included studies. Comparisons found little heterogeneity. In two immunological responses the combined vaccine achieved lower responses than the separate vaccines for HIB and tetanus. No significant differences in immunogenicity were found for pertussis, diphtheria, polio and hepatitis B. Serious adverse events were comparable with mainly hospitalisation and acute bronchiolitis cases. Minor adverse events such as pain and redness were more common in children given the combined vaccine. Overall, the direction shown by the results is in favour of the DTPw (diptheria-tetanus-whole cell pertussis)-HBV-HIB vaccine rather than the DTPa (diptheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis)-HBV-HIB vaccine when compared to the separate vaccines (size of effect: risk ratio (RR) 1.43; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.98 to 2.10, for 5269 participants).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS:

We could not conclude that the immune responses elicited by the combined vaccine were different from or equivalent to the separate vaccines. There was significantly less immunological response for HIB and tetanus and more local reactions in the combined injections. However, these differences rely mostly on one study each. Studies did not use an intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis and we were uncertain about the risk of bias in many of the studies. These results are therefore inconclusive. Studies addressing clinical end points whenever possible, using correct methodology and a large enough sample size should be conducted.

BACKGROUND:

Unrelenting high morbidity and mortality have mandated that immunogenic vaccines be used to combat pneumococcal disease in infants.

OBJECTIVES:

To evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of a nonavalent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine and the antigenic interaction when administered simultaneously with diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis vaccines.

METHODS:

Two hundred seven infants were randomized to receive three doses of either nonavalent protein conjugate pneumococcal vaccine (PnCV) or inactivated polio vaccine (IPV) at 2, 3 and 4 months of age with routine Expanded Program of Immunization vaccines as scheduled. Vaccinees were visited on Days 1, 2 and 7 to observe local and systemic adverse reactions. Blood was drawn before the first dose and 1 month after the third dose. Antibody concentrations in sera were measured by standardized enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Nasopharyngeal carriage of pneumococci was tested at 5 and 9 months of age.

RESULTS:

No serious reactions were observed. Local induration and tenderness were observed more commonly at the site of administration of diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis vaccines than at the site of administration of IPV or PnCV. Between 79 and 91% achieved >1 microg/ml antibody against specific pneumococcal serotypes. Antibody responses to diphtheria and pertussis antigens were similar in both groups; however, antibody response to tetanus toxoid was significantly lower in infants who received PnCV (geometric mean concentration, 11.1 vs. 17.4; P < 0.001). Nasopharyngeal carriage in PnCV-vaccinated children was reduced but not significantly different from those vaccinated with IPV.

CONCLUSION:

Simultaneous administration of PnCV with Expanded Program of Immunization vaccines is safe and immunogenic. immune response to the composite antigens is likely to confer protection.