This study examined alemtuzumab (anti-CD 52, Campath-1H) and basiliximab (anti-CD 25, Simulect) as induction immunosuppression in kidney transplantation. We used a single-center, nonrandomized, retrospective, sequential study design to evaluate outcomes in kidney transplant recipients given either alemtuzumab (n = 123) or basiliximab (n = 155) induction in combination with a prednisone-free maintenance protocol using tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil. Kaplan-Meier analyses of long-term patient and graft survivals and rejection rates were determined according to induction agent, donor source and recipient ethnicity. Secondary endpoints included the quality of renal allograft function and the etiology of infectious complications. Overall long-term patient and graft survival rates did not significantly differ between patients treated with alemtuzumab and basiliximab. A lower rate of early (<3 months) rejection was observed in the alemtuzumab (4.1%) versus the basiliximab (11.6%) group, but the rates for both groups were equivalent at 1 year. Patient and kidney survival and rejection rates were nearly identical between Caucasians and African Americans that received alemtuzumab. Quality of renal function and incidence of infectious complications were similar in the two groups. Alemtuzumab induction therapy was similar in efficacy to basiliximab in a prednisone-free maintenance immunosuppressive protocol for an ethnically diverse population of kidney transplant recipients.

RATIONALE:

Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as temozolomide, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays to kill tumor cells. Vaccines may help the body build an effective immune response to kill tumor cells. Monoclonal antibodies, such as basiliximab, can block tumor growth in different ways. Some block the ability of tumor cells to grow and spread. Others find tumor cells and help kill them or carry tumor-killing substances to them. It is not yet known whether giving chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and vaccine therapy together with basiliximab is a more effective treatment for glioblastoma multiforme than chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and vaccine therapy alone.

PURPOSE:

This randomized phase I trial is studying the side effects and best way to give chemotherapy and radiation therapy followed by vaccine therapy with basiliximab in treating patients with glioblastoma multiforme that has been removed by surgery.

Background: Two prospective studies that were performed before the era of highly sensitive solid-phase assays have shown a lower incidence of acute rejection in highly sensitized kidney-transplant patients given polyclonal antibodies compared with those given anti-CD25 monoclonal antibodies. Methods: This prospective pilot randomized French multicenter study aimed to compare anti–T-lymphocyte Ig (ATLG) (n = 32) and basiliximab (n = 27) in highly sensitized kidney-transplant patients without preformed donor-specific antibodies (pDSAs) as assessed by a Luminex Single-Antigen flow bead assay. Only patients with a calculated panel reactive antibody ≥50%, with at least 1 antibody with a mean fluorescence intensity ≥5000 and without a historical pDSA and without a pDSA on the day of transplantation were included. Results: Treatment failure as defined by biopsy-proven acute rejection, patient lost to follow-up, graft loss, and death was observed in 18.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.9%–37.1%) and 18.8% (95% CI, 8.9%–37.1%) in patients who received ATLG and 14.8% (95% CI, 5.8%–34.8%) and 28.2% (95% CI, 14.2%–51.2%) of patients who received basiliximab, respectively at 6 (P = 0.66) and 12 (P = 0.62) months post-transplantation. One T cell–mediated rejection was observed in ATLG-treated patients (3.1%). One antibody-mediated rejection due to a de novo donor-specific antibody (DSA) occurred in basiliximab-treated patients (3.7%). Patient survival, graft survival, kidney parameters, and infection rate were similar in the 2 groups. Conclusion: This pilot study indicates that in highly sensitized kidney-transplant patients without pDSAs, both ATLG and basiliximab can be used efficiently and safely. However, because of the lack of power, these results should be interpreted with caution.

A total of 192 children and adolescents undergoing renal transplantation were randomly chosen to receive tacrolimus, azathioprine and corticosteroids (TAS,n =93) or tacrolimus, azathioprine, corticosteroids and two doses of basiliximab (TAS + B, n=99). Six-month outcome data have previously been reported; this manuscript reports the 2-year data. Complete 2-year data were available on 164 (85.4%) of the original 192 patients. There was a single death in the TAS arm. Kaplan-Meier estimates of survival free of graft loss at 2 years were 94.9% in the TAS + B arm and 89.6% in the TAS arm [hazard ratio (HR) 0.52; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.17 to 1.54, P=0.23]. Estimates of survival free from rejection at 2 years were 75.2% in the TAS + B arm and 68.7% in the TAS arm (HR 0.81; 95% CI 0.46 to 1.40, P=0.44). The mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) at 2 years, was 65.8 ml/min per 1.73 m2 body surface area in the TAS arm and 66.7 ml/min per 1.73 m2 in the TAS + B arm (P=0.78). Blood pressure and cholesterol levels were similar in the two arms, and there was no evidence of a difference in the incidence of infection or malignancy. These data provide further evidence of a lack of benefit associated with the addition of basiliximab to a TAS regimen for European paediatric renal transplant recipients at low immunological risk. © IPNA 2008.

Introduction: During the past few years, the new immunosuppressants such as tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofeti (MMF), and basiliximab, have led to important declines in the incidence of acute rejection and could provide a more potent substrate to attempt safe steroid withdrawal. Methods: We analyzed the clinical outcome of 3 months steroid withdrawal protocol using tacrolimus, MMF, and basiliximab. This 12-month study was an open-label, prospective, controlled clinical trial in a single center. For the patients who entered the protocol, prednisolone was slowly withdrawn by 2.5 mg in every two weeks until 8 weeks after entering the protocol (5 months post-transplantation). Results: Thirty de-novo renal transplant recipients were enrolled. During the steroid withdrawal, 7 patients (26.0%) discontinued the protocol and maintained on steroid treatment. Among 20 patients with the steroid free immunosuppressions with tacolimus and mycophenolate mofetil, 8 patients (40.0%) re-started the steroid. At 12 months after transplantation, patient and graft survival were 100%. Estimated GFR at 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months post-transplantation were 58.9 ± 16.4 mL/min, 53.2 ± 17.9 mL/min, and 49.7 ± 16.0 mL/min, respectively. Conclusions: This study confirms that 3 months steroid withdrawal with tacrolimus, basiliximab, mycophenolate mofetil in kidney transplantation is not associated with increasing mortality or graft loss. Steroid withdrawal after 3 months is a strategy that could be well advised.

OBJECTIVE:

The objective of this study is to assess a Simulect (basiliximab) regimen in routine clinical practice in the Spanish kidney transplantation units to evaluate efficacy and safety.

METHODS:

In this prospective, observational study, data on demographics, parameters of efficacy, and safety in patients who under with kidney transplantation treated with Simulect (basiliximab) were collected through an on-line collection system.

RESULTS:

One hundred sixty three patients at 18 kidney transplant units included 12 months follow-up. The patient mean age was 52 years (DS 13,67) including 96 (58.90%) men and 67 (41.10%) women. Cold ischemia time was 19 hours (DS 6,79). Only 2 patients presented with PRA >50%. For prophylactic immunosuppression, 67.13% of patients received triple therapy with CNI (cyclosporine 49.65% or tacrolimus 17.48%), MMF (66.43%) or AZA (10.49%), and steroids. Incidence of acute rejection (AR) at 12 months was 12.27% (1.84% steroid-resistant). In subgroup analysis, AR was 13.5% in nondiabetics and 4.5% in diabetics, including 3 steroid-resistant episodes (1.84%) in nondiabetics and none in diabetics. In relation to donor age, AR was incidence 10.3% in patients with kidneys from donors aged 50 years or younger and 10.6% when donors were older than 50 years, including 1 (1.73%) and 2 (1.93%) steroid-resistant episodes, respectively. The graft and patient survival rates at 12 months were 90% and 98%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS:

Simulect (basiliximab) used in routine clinical practice provided good prophylaxis against acute rejection in several kidney transplant patient populations, similar to that observed in randomized clinical studies with excellent tolerability and safety.

During the past few years, new immunosuppressants, such as tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and basiliximab, have been shown to successfully decrease the incidence of acute rejection, possibly acting as potent substrates for safe steroid withdrawal. Therefore, clinical outcome of 3 months steroid withdrawal, while using the above immunosuppressants, was analyzed. Clinical trial registry No. was NCT 01550445. Thirty de novo renal transplant recipients were enrolled, and prednisolone was slowly withdrawn 3 months post-transplantation by 2.5 mg at every two weeks, until 8 weeks. During steroid withdrawal, 10 patients (30.0%) discontinued the protocol and they were maintained on steroid treatment. Among 20 steroid free patients, 8 patients (40.0%) re-started the steroid within 12 months post-transplantation. By the study endpoint, 12 (40%) recipients did not take steroid and survival of patients and grafts was 100%. In conclusion, in kidney transplant patients, 3 months steroid withdrawal while taking tacrolimus, basiliximab and mycophenolate mofetil was not associated with increased mortality or graft loss. Despite various causes of failure of steroid withdrawal during the follow-up period, it is a strategy well advised for kidney transplant recipients with regard to long-term steroid-related complications.

PURPOSE:

To compare the long-term effects of the interleukin-2 receptor antagonist basiliximab versus rabbit antithymocyte globulin as an induction therapy for living-related renal transplantation.

METHODS:

This is a prospective, open-label, nonrandomized, controlled study including 213 cases of renal transplant. Immunosuppressive therapy containing calcineurin inhibitors, mycophenolate mofetil and steroids was applied in all cases. The interleukin-2 receptor antagonist group (IL2Ra group) included 108 cases with 20 mg basiliximab induction on Day 0 and Day 4. The other 105 cases comprised the rabbit antithymocyte globulin group (rATG group) with 1.0 mg/kg/day ATG induction from Day 0 to Day 4. The primary endpoint was biopsy-proven acute rejection. Other endpoints included delayed graft function (DGF), graft loss and death.

RESULTS:

All patients were followed up for 3 years. Acute rejection rates in the IL2Ra group and the ATG group were 5.6 and 3.8 % (P = 0.781), and the differences in the DGF rates, graft loss and death were insignificant between groups. All-cause infection rates in the IL2Ra and rATG groups were 26.9 and 43.8 % (P = 0.010). Urinary tract infections were more common in the rATG group than in the IL2Ra group (15.2 vs 6.5 %, P = 0.040). Specific viral infection rates were significantly different (18.1 % in rATG group vs 8.3 % in IL2Ra group, P = 0.035).

CONCLUSIONS:

IL2Ra and rATG had no significant differences as induction therapies during the perioperative period of living-related renal transplantation, according to acute rejection rates, DGF rates, graft loss, 1- and 3-year patient/graft survival rates. However, the incidence of infection, especially of urinary tract infection and specific viral infection, was higher in rATG-induced patients.

Este artículo no tiene resumen

Este artículo no tiene resumen