Revisión sistemática
No clasificado
Revisión sistemática
No clasificado
Epidemiological studies suggest a relationship between suntanning habits and high risk of melanoma. A literature review was carried out for the period between 1977 and 1998 using Medline and Embase (Excerpta Medica) databases. The analysis showed that intentional sun exposure is highly prevalent among youths, despite their awareness of the risks involved in excessive exposure to ultraviolet radiation and their knowledge on skin protection measures. Intentional exposure is a habit fostered by certain beliefs and attitudes towards suntanning and stimulated by peer pressure and aesthetic referents. The most common tanning practices involve a high risk of developing melanoma. It was concluded that the most effective means to prevent melanoma is mass media dissemination of the concept that having a tanned skin is not healthy -- since it implies the skin being damaged by solar ultraviolet radiation -- and education campaigns for effectively changing people's behaviors and their motivations.
Revisión sistemática
No clasificado
A variety of estimates of the value and impact of physician skin examinations (PSEs) in screening for melanoma have been published. Although current melanoma screening guidelines vary, new evidence supports improved melanoma outcomes associated with PSEs. In this systematic review, we evaluated 5 observational studies of the impact of PSEs on melanoma thickness at diagnosis and melanoma mortality rates. Although definitive evidence from randomized controlled trials supporting improved health outcomes associated with PSEs is lacking, these well-designed observational studies have found PSEs to be correlated with thinner melanomas at diagnosis and reduced melanoma mortality rates.
Estudio primario
No clasificado
Unknown melanoma occurs as metastasis to skin, nodes or viscera, without a detectable cutaneous primary tumour. We reviewed our database of 4881 melanoma patients, diagnosed and followed up prospectively for a 33-year period. We identified 93 cases of metastatic melanoma without evidence of primary; however, five of these patients had a history of a previous excision of a presumed benign lesion without histological examination and were excluded from analyses. At diagnosis, metastases were cutaneous in 35.3% of cases, nodal in 43.2% and visceral in 17% of cases; in 4.5% of patients, both skin and nodes were involved. In all cases, clinical inspection and staging procedures performed at diagnosis of metastatic disease failed to identify a primary melanoma. In 11 cases (11.8%), extensively regressed pigmented lesions (without evidence of melanoma cells at the histological examination) were documented; moreover, we identified in our series five patients with unknown primary affected by vitiligo. The 5-year and 10-year overall survival rates were 49.6 and 41.4%, respectively, with a median of 4.9 years. The 5-year and 10-year time to progression rates were 39.4 and 32.3%, respectively, with a median of 2.3 years. Survival was longer in females and showed significant differences among patients with skin, lymph node or visceral involvement at diagnosis. In melanoma patients, unknown primary represents a not so rare event, with an uncertain origin. We confirmed the relatively good prognosis of unknown primary melanoma patients, a fact that has to be taken into consideration for their management.
Revisión sistemática
No clasificado
Revisión sistemática
No clasificado
Resumen estructurado de revisiones sistemáticas
No clasificado
Revisión sistemática
No clasificado
Lifetime risk for malignant melanoma has increased from 1 in 1500 in the United States in 1930 to 1 in 75 projected for the year 2000. Because the tumor's thickness at excision is the primary prognostic determinant, early detection through the history and physical examination can play an important role in the patient's clinical course. Two checklists have been developed as diagnostic aids, the ABCD (A indicates asymmetry; B, border irregularity; C, irregular color; and D, diameter >6 mm) and the revised 7-point checklists. These checklists should be interpreted with some discretion, but 2 studies have found the sensitivity for the ABCD checklist to be 92% (95% confidence interval [CI], 82%-96%) and 100% (95% CI, 54%-100%); 1 study found the specificity to be 98% (95% CI, 95%-99%). The revised 7-point checklist has been reported to have a sensitivity of 79% (95% CI, 70%-85%) to 100% (95% CI, 94%-100%) and specificity of 30% (95% CI, 21%-39%) to 37% (95% CI, 28%-46%). Physicians' global assessments for detecting the presence or absence of melanoma are estimated to have a specificity of 96% to 99%, while sensitivity ranges widely from 50% to 97%. Nondermatologists' examinations appear to be less sensitive than examinations performed by dermatologists.
Revisión sistemática
No clasificado
Melanoma incidence is increasing rapidly worldwide among white-skinned populations. Earlier diagnosis is the principal factor that can improve prognosis. Defining high-risk populations using risk prediction models may help targeted screening and early detection approaches. In this systematic review, we searched Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library for primary research studies reporting or validating models to predict risk of developing cutaneous melanoma. A total of 4,141 articles were identified from the literature search and six through citation searching. Twenty-five risk models were included. Between them, the models considered 144 possible risk factors, including 18 measures of number of nevi and 26 of sun/UV exposure. Those most frequently included in final risk models were number of nevi, presence of freckles, history of sunburn, hair color, and skin color. Despite the different factors included and different cutoff values for sensitivity and specificity, almost all models yielded sensitivities and specificities that fit along a summary ROC with area under the ROC (AUROC) of 0.755, suggesting that most models had similar discrimination. Only two models have been validated in separate populations and both also showed good discrimination with AUROC values of 0.79 (0.70-0.86) and 0.70 (0.64-0.77). Further research should focus on validating existing models rather than developing new ones.
Revisión sistemática
No clasificado