Whether the combination of lamivudine (LAM) plus adefovir (ADV) de novo is more effective than entecavir (ETV) monotherapy in patients with HBV-associated decompensated cirrhosis is still controversial. We searched seven randomized controlled trials that included 411 patients in this meta-analysis. There are 205 and 206 patients in these two groups separately. The pooled risk ratio (RR) and mean difference (MD) were used to assess the treatment effects. ETV monotherapy significantly improved Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) scores (MD = 0.33, 95%CI [0.21-0.44], P < .00001), and was associated with lower rates of serum creatinine increase compared LAM + ADV combination therapy (RR = 4.76, 95%CI [1.11-20.33], P = .04) at 48 weeks. The reduction of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels, HBV DNA levels, the rate of ALT normalization, undetectable HBV DNA, HBV e antigen (HBeAg) loss, HBeAg seroconversion and mortality were similar between the two groups. ETV is more effective than LAM + ADV in improving CTP scores at 48 weeks. Both of the LAM + ADV and ETV had similar efficacy in improving virological and biochemical parameters at 48 weeks of follow-up. Furthermore, use of these agents in decompensated HBV patients was generally safe and well tolerated at 48 weeks. However, the nephrotoxicity of ADV, and the potential adverse effects of ETV should be considered and monitored during prolonged therapy.

Este artículo no tiene resumen

Este artículo no tiene resumen

To compare the efficacy and safety of Lamivudine (LAM) plus Adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) combination therapy and Entecavir (ETV) monotherapy for chronic hepatitis B patients. 120 patients with chronic hepatitis B managed in a single-centre clinical practice (median 96 weeks) were split into 2 cohorts, one was treated with de-novo combination Lamivudine (100 mg/day) plus Adefovir (10 mg/day) (LAM+ADV), the other with Entecavir (0.5 mg/day) monotherapy. Serum levels of ALT, creatinine, HBsAg, HBeAg and HBV viral load, together with genotypic resistence were analyzed at 0, 12, 24, 48, 96 weeks, respectively. HBV DNA was determined by real-time PCR. HBsAg and HBeAg were assessed by chemiluminescence. Serum levels of ALT and creatinine were detected by automatic biochemical analyzer. HBV genotypic resistence was tested by direct sequencing. (1) At the time point of 96 weeks, a total of 99 patients (51 cases in combination therapy cohort and 48 case in monotherapy cohort) were compared. The baseline characteristics as for HBV viral load, median age, serum levels of ALT and creatinine were compatible between combination therapy cohort and monotherapy cohort. (2) The rates of HBV DNA values is less than 300 copies/ml and HBV DNA values is less than 1000 copies/ml had no significant difference between LAM + ADV and ETV cohorts by the 12 and 24 weeks (P more than 0.05). (3) At the time point of 48 weeks, the rates of HBV DNA is less than 1000 copies/ml, HBeAg seroconversion, and ALT normalization were similar in both cohorts, though the rate of HBV DNA values is less than 300 copies/ml was obviously higher in combination therapy cohort than that of monotherapy cohort (90.7% vs 76%, P values is less than 0.05). (4) At the time point of 96 weeks, the rates of HBV DNA values is less than 300 copies/ml (96.1% vs 79.2%), HBV DNA values is less than 1000 copies/ml (98% vs 87.5%) and the HBeAg seroconversion (41.7% vs 16.7%) were markedly higher in combination therapy cohort than those of monotherapy cohort statistically (P values is less than 0.05 for all). The mean values of decreases for HBV viral loads and HBsAg levels were smilar in both cohorts at 48 and 96 weeks. (5) Elevated serum creatinine not be found in both cohorts at the end of treatment. (6) No virological breakthrough occurred in combination therapy cohort at the end of treatment. Four patients in monotherapy cohort were found with virological breakthrough at 96 weeks and three cases among were confirmed to be of variants associated with ETV resistance (rtL180M + T184L + M204V). Present study suggests that Lamivudine plus Adefovir dipivoxil de-novo combination therapy was more efficacious than Entecavir monotherapy for CHB patients and the tolerance is compatible.

Este artículo no tiene resumen

Background: Hepatitis B virus infection remains 1 of the major health threats worldwide. Currently, lamivudine plus adefovir combination therapy or entecavir monotherapy is usually used for the treatment of patients with lamivudine-resistant chronic hepatitis B (CHB). However, there are few systematic comparisons between the efficacy of lamivudine plus adefovir and the efficacy of entecavir in the treatment of these patients. Objective: The goal of this systematic study and meta-analysis was to assess the efficacy of lamivudine plus adefovir compared with entecavir for the treatment of patients with lamivudine-resistant CHB. Methods: A comprehensive literature search of PUBMED, Web of Science, WANFANG database, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Review, were screened to obtain citations from January 1990 to January 2012 in this study. Data analysis was done by using the Review Manager Software 5.1. Results: Eight studies were suitable for analysis. A total of 696 patients with lamivudine-resistant CHB were studied and grouped according to treatment: 341 patients in the entecavir group and 355 patients in the lamivudine plus adefovir group. The results found that the rates of undetectable hepatitis B virus DNA levels, alanine aminotransferase normalization, hepatitis B e antigen loss, and hepatitis B e antigen seroconversion were not significantly different between the lamivudine plus adefovir group and the entecavir group. Moreover, the rate of adverse reactions was also not significantly different between the 2 groups. However, virologic breakthrough for the patients with lamivudine resistance was higher in the entecavir group than in the lamivudine plus adefovir group. Conclusions: For these CHB patients with lamivudine resistance, lamivudine plus adefovir was a better treatment option than entecavir alone.

BACKGROUND:

Chronic hepatitis B is a disease of concern due to its life-threatening complications like cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in 20-40% of patients. There are about 400 million people affected worldwide with HBV, and over 300,000 die every year from HBV-related diseases. Oral antivirals like lamivudine, adefovir, entecavir, and tenofovir are commonly used to treat chronic hepatitis B. In this study, we tried to evaluate the comparative efficacy of these drugs alone and in combination.

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

Chronic hepatitis B patients with HBV-DNA more than 10⁴Copies/mL irrespective of their HBeAg status (n=60) were enrolled in a prospective study. 21, 20, and 19 patients were treated with lamivudine (100 mg/day) plus adefovir (10 mg/day) combination entecavir monotherapy (0.5 mg/day) and tenofovir monotherapy (300 mg/day), respectively and were followed up for 24 weeks with their virological, serological, and biochemical markers measured at 12 and 24 weeks.

RESULTS:

After 24 weeks of treatment, there was no significant difference between the 3 groups in suppressing HBV-DNA to undetectable levels. The median decrease in HBV-DNA levels from baseline was better with tenofovir and entecavir monotherapies than lamivudine and adefovir combination, which was statistically significant. There was no significant difference between the 3 groups in HBsAg and HBeAg seroconversion and normalization of biochemical parameters.

CONCLUSION:

Entecavir and tenofovir monotherapy were found to be more effective than lamivudine plus adefovir combination in reducing the HBV-DNA levels. However, lamivudine plus adefovir combination was not too inferior, especially when cost of treatment was taken into consideration.

Background & Aims: Prolonged lamivudine therapy is associated with treatment-resistant YMDD mutant hepatitis B virus (HBV). We evaluated the efficacy and safety of adding adefovir dipivoxil to lamivudine in 135 patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) and YMDD mutant HBV. Methods: Ninety-five patients with compensated CHB (group A) were randomized to adefovir 10 mg daily (n = 46) or placebo (n = 49) for 52 weeks while continuing treatment with lamivudine. Forty patients with decompensated hepatitis B or post-liver transplantation (group B) received adefovir and lamivudine. The primary end point was a decline in serum HBV DNA level to 105 copies/mL or a >2 log10 reduction from baseline at weeks 48 and 52. Results: HBV DNA response occurred in 85% of patients (39 of 46) in group A given combined therapy versus 11% (5 of 46) receiving lamivudine alone (P < 0.001), with a significant change in HBV DNA level from baseline (P < 0.001) between treatment groups (median, -4.6 vs. +0.3 log10 copies/mL, respectively). Normalization of alanine aminotransferase levels occurred in 31% of patients (14 of 45) receiving combined therapy versus 6% (3 of 48) receiving lamivudine alone (P = 0.002). Ninety-two percent of patients (36 of 39) in group B had an HBV DNA response (median change of -4.6 log10 copies/mL) and improved liver chemistries (P ≤ 5 0.001). Both treatment regimens were well tolerated, and renal function abnormalities were not observed in either group. Conclusions: The addition of adefovir dipivoxil to lamivudine in patients with CHB with compensated or decompensated liver disease due to YMDD mutant HBV is associated with virologic and biochemical improvement during 52 weeks of treatment and is well tolerated.

Adefovir dipivoxil has been used alone or together with lamivudine to suppress lamivudine-resistant hepatitis B virus (HBV). However, the dynamics of HBV populations under different selection pressures and their impact on treatment outcome are poorly understood. Pyrosequencing was applied to quantify longitudinally the evolution of wild type and lamivudine/adefovir-resistant HBV. Eight patients, with lamivudine-resistant HBV, were randomized to receive adefovir monotherapy or adefovir/lamivudine combination therapy for a median of 79 and 71 weeks, respectively. Pyrosequencing proved highly sensitive with a lower limit of quantitation of minor HBV populations of 2% irrespective of viraemia levels. Adefovir/lamivudine treatment resulted in greater viraemia reduction than adefovir monotherapy. During combination therapy, lamivudine-resistant HBV populations (codons 180 and 204) remained dominant (>90%) and no adefovir-resistance developed. During adefovir monotherapy, reversion to wild-type HBV was detected in two patients with one patient accumulating rapidly adefovir-resistant HBV along with increased viraemia. In conclusion, the dynamics of drug-resistant HBV strains vary under different selection pressures which have a significant impact on the success of rescue therapy, as well as for the selection of new mutations. The use of techniques such as Pyrosequencing provides an evidence-based approach for successful management of drug-resistant HBV.

Background & Aims: Treatment with adefovir dipivoxil for 48 weeks resulted in clinical improvement in patients with hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-negative chronic hepatitis B that was lost when treatment was discontinued. We investigated the efficacy, safety, and resistance profile of adefovir dipivoxil treatment for up to 240 weeks. Methods: HBeAg-negative patients were treated double blind with placebo or adefovir dipivoxil 10 mg once daily for 48 weeks, followed by adefovir dipivoxil from week 49 to 96. At week 97, 125 patients enrolled in a 144-week, open-label phase. Patients received adefovir dipivoxil for up to 192 or 240 weeks. Results: Serum hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA levels were less than 1000 copies per milliliter in 67% of patients, and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels normalized in 69% after 240 weeks. After 192 or 240 weeks of treatment, over 83% of patients had improvement in necroinflammation, and over 73% had improvement in fibrosis. Ishak fibrosis scores improved compared with baseline in 35%, 55%, and 71% of patients after 48, 192, and 240 weeks of adefovir dipivoxil, respectively. After 240 weeks, the cumulative probability of HBV polymerase mutations was 29%, but the cumulative probability of mutations with virologic resistance was 20% and of mutations, virologic resistance, and ALT elevations was 11%. Slight elevations in creatinine were confirmed in 4 (3%) patients. Conclusions: Treatment with adefovir dipivoxil for up to 240 weeks was well tolerated and produced significant, increasing improvement in hepatic fibrosis, durable suppression of HBV replication, normalization of liver enzymes, and delayed development of resistance. © 2006 AGA Institute.