BACKGROUND:

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune, T-cell-dependent, inflammatory, demyelinating disease of the central nervous system, with an unpredictable course. Current MS therapies focus on treating and preventing exacerbations, and avoiding the progression of disability. At present, there is no treatment that is capable of safely and effectively reaching these objectives. Clinical trials suggest that alemtuzumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody, could be a promising option for MS.

OBJECTIVES:

To evaluate the benefits and harms of alemtuzumab alone or associated with other treatments in people with any form of MS.

SEARCH METHODS:

We used standard, extensive Cochrane search methods. The latest search date was 21 June 2022.

SELECTION CRITERIA:

We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in adults with any subtype of MS comparing alemtuzumab alone or associated with other medications versus placebo; another active drug; or alemtuzumab in another dose, regimen, or duration.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS:

We used standard Cochrane methods. Our co-primary outcomes were 1. relapse-free survival, 2. sustained disease progression, and 3. number of participants experiencing at least one adverse event. Our secondary outcomes were 4. participants free of clinical disability, 5. quality of life, 6. change in disability, 7. fatigue, 8. new or enlarging lesions on resonance imaging, and 9. dropouts. We used GRADE to assess certainty of evidence for each outcome.

MAIN RESULTS:

We included three RCTs (1713 participants) comparing intravenous alemtuzumab versus subcutaneous interferon beta-1a for relapsing-remitting MS. Participants were treatment-naive (two studies) or had experienced at least one relapse after interferon or glatiramer (one study). Alemtuzumab was given at doses of 12 mg/day or 24 mg/day for five days at months 0 and 12, or 24 mg/day for three days at months 12 and 24. Participants in the interferon beta-1a group received 44 μg three times weekly. Alemtuzumab 12 mg: 1. may improve relapse-free survival at 36 months (hazard ratio [HR] 0.31, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.18 to 0.53; 1 study, 221 participants; low-certainty evidence); 2. may improve sustained disease progression-free survival at 36 months (HR 0.25, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.56; 1 study, 223 participants; low-certainty evidence); 3. may make little to no difference on the proportion of participants with at least one adverse event at 36 months (risk ratio [RR] 1.00, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.02; 1 study, 224 participants; low-certainty evidence), although the proportion of participants with at least one adverse event was high with both drugs; 4. may slightly reduce disability at 36 months (mean difference [MD] -0.70, 95% CI -1.04 to -0.36; 1 study, 223 participants; low-certainty evidence). The evidence is very uncertain regarding the risk of dropouts at 36 months (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.57 to 1.14; 1 study, 224 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Alemtuzumab 24 mg: 1. may improve relapse-free survival at 36 months (HR 0.21, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.40; 1 study, 221 participants; low-certainty evidence); 2. may improve sustained disease progression-free survival at 36 months (HR 0.33, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.69; 1 study, 221 participants; low-certainty evidence); 3. may make little to no difference on the proportion of participants with at least one adverse event at 36 months (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.02; 1 study, 215 participants; low-certainty evidence), although the proportion of participants with at least one adverse event was high with both drugs; 4. may slightly reduce disability at 36 months (MD -0.83, 95% CI -1.16 to -0.50; 1 study, 221 participants; low-certainty evidence); 5. may reduce the risk of dropouts at 36 months (RR 0.08, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.57; 1 study, 215 participants; low-certainty evidence). For quality of life, fatigue, and participants free of clinical disease activity, the studies either did not consider these outcomes or they used different measuring tools to those planned in this review.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS:

Compared with interferon beta-1a, alemtuzumab may improve relapse-free survival and sustained disease progression-free survival, and make little to no difference on the proportion of participants with at least one adverse event for people with relapsing-remitting MS at 36 months. The certainty of the evidence for these results was very low to low.

BACKGROUND:

The anti-CD52 monoclonal antibody alemtuzumab reduced disease activity in a phase 2 trial of previously untreated patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. We aimed to assess efficacy and safety of first-line alemtuzumab compared with interferon beta 1a in a phase 3 trial.

METHODS:

In our 2 year, rater-masked, randomised controlled phase 3 trial, we enrolled adults aged 18-50 years with previously untreated relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Eligible participants were randomly allocated in a 2:1 ratio by an interactive voice response system, stratified by site, to receive intravenous alemtuzumab 12 mg per day or subcutaneous interferon beta 1a 44 μg. Interferon beta 1a was given three-times per week and alemtuzumab was given once per day for 5 days at baseline and once per day for 3 days at 12 months. Coprimary endpoints were relapse rate and time to 6 month sustained accumulation of disability in all patients who received at least one dose of study drug. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00530348.

FINDINGS:

187 (96%) of 195 patients randomly allocated interferon beta 1a and 376 (97%) of 386 patients randomly allocated alemtuzumab were included in the primary analyses. 75 (40%) patients in the interferon beta 1a group relapsed (122 events) compared with 82 (22%) patients in the alemtuzumab group (119 events; rate ratio 0·45 [95% CI 0·32-0·63]; p<0.0001), corresponding to a 54·9% improvement with alemtuzumab. Based on Kaplan-Meier estimates, 59% of patients in the interferon beta 1a group were relapse-free at 2 years compared with 78% of patients in the alemtuzumab group (p<0·0001). 20 (11%) of patients in the interferon beta 1a group had sustained accumulation of disability compared with 30 (8%) in the alemtuzumab group (hazard ratio 0·70 [95% CI 0·40-1·23]; p=0·22). 338 (90%) of patients in the alemtuzumab group had infusion-associated reactions; 12 (3%) of which were regarded as serious. Infections, predominantly of mild or moderate severity, occurred in 253 (67%) patients treated with alemtuzumab versus 85 (45%) patients treated with interferon beta 1a. 62 (16%) patients treated with alemtuzumab had herpes infections (predominantly cutaneous) compared with three (2%) patients treated with interferon beta 1a. By 24 months, 68 (18%) patients in the alemtuzumab group had thyroid-associated adverse events compared with 12 (6%) in the interferon beta 1a group, and three (1%) had immune thrombocytopenia compared with none in the interferon beta 1a group. Two patients in the alemtuzumab group developed thyroid papillary carcinoma.

INTERPRETATION:

Alemtuzumab's consistent safety profile and benefit in terms of reductions of relapse support its use for patients with previously untreated relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis; however, benefit in terms of disability endpoints noted in previous trials was not observed here.

FUNDING:

Genzyme (Sanofi) and Bayer Schering Pharma.

BACKGROUND:

Alemtuzumab is a humanised monoclonal antibody that depletes lymphocytes, causing long-term immunomodulation. In a 3-year, rater-blinded phase 2 study (the CAMMS223 study) in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), alemtuzumab reduced relapse rate and the risk of sustained accumulation of disability compared with subcutaneous interferon beta-1a, and the mean expanded disability status scale (EDSS) score of the alemtuzumab cohort improved compared with baseline. Adverse events included infusion-associated reactions, predominantly mild to moderate infections, thyroid disorders, and immune thrombocytopenia. In this study, we further analysed the CAMMS223 data with the aim of determining whether demographic and baseline disease-related characteristics affect the beneficial effects of alemtuzumab. Additionally, we aimed to describe a new outcome measure in multiple sclerosis research: sustained reduction in disability.

METHODS:

334 treatment-naive patients with active, early RRMS were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive interferon beta-1a (44 μg subcutaneously three times per week), or 24 mg per day or 12 mg per day alemtuzumab intravenously for 2 or 3 annual cycles. We analysed freedom from clinical disease activity (CDA; defined as no relapses and no sustained accumulation of disability) and occurrence of sustained reduction in disability (SRD; a ≥1 point decrease on the EDSS sustained for 6 consecutive months for patients with a baseline EDSS ≥2), and analysed efficacy outcomes for subgroups based on age, sex, geographic region, MRI-T1 brain volume, MRI-T2 lesion volume, disease duration, number of previous relapses within 2 years, and EDSS.

FINDINGS:

322 patients were analysed. 161 of 215 patients treated with alemtuzumab were free of CDA at 36 months (Kaplan-Meier estimate 71·8%, 95% CI 63·1-78·8%) compared with 52 of 107 patients treated with interferon beta-1a (42·6%, 32·4-52·4%; hazard ratio [HR]=0·31, 0·20-0·46; p<0·0001). For the 199 patients with a baseline EDSS score greater than or equal to 2, SRD was more likely (HR=2·61, 1·54-4·43; p=0·0004) among patients treated with alemtuzumab (66 of 133 patients, Kaplan-Meier estimate 51·6%, 95% CI 43·2-60·7%) than patients treated with interferon beta-1a (15 of 66 patients, 27·2%, 17·2-41·4%). All disability and relapse outcomes showed evidence of beneficial effects of alemtuzumab compared with interferon beta-1a across all analysed patient subsets, and no subgroup of patients consistently responded better than others to alemtuzumab.

INTERPRETATION:

Alemtuzumab reduced disease activity compared with interferon beta-1a in most of the analysed subgroups. Significantly greater numbers of patients experienced sustained improvement in disability after treatment with alemtuzumab than interferon beta-1a. The efficacy offered by alemtuzumab is a substantial advance in the treatment of multiple sclerosis.

FUNDING:

Genzyme and Bayer Schering Pharma.

BACKGROUND:

Patients with B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) with 17p deletion respond poorly to chemotherapy. This retrospective study evaluated the benefit of alemtuzumab monotherapy in unselected patients with advanced CLL in the various cytogenetic subgroups.

PATIENTS AND METHODS:

Data were collected from 105 consecutive, pretreated, cytogenetically defined patients who had received alemtuzumab. Response, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were assessed.

RESULTS:

The hierarchic incidence of cytogenetic abnormalities was: 13q deletion (as sole abnormality), 18%; trisomy 12, 13%; 11q deletion, 19%; 17p deletion, 33%; and none of these, 16%. Overall response rate (ORR) was 43% in the total cohort and 49% in the subgroup of 17p-deleted patients (n = 35). From the start of alemtuzumab monotherapy, median PFS in the total cohort and in the subgroup of 17p-deleted patients was 7.0 and 7.1 months, respectively. Median OS in the total cohort and in 17p-deleted patients was 32.8 and 19.1 months, respectively. The poor-risk group of patients with CLL (i.e. fludarabine resistant, 17p deletion; n = 20) showed encouraging ORR, PFS, and OS (35%, 7.0 and 19.2 months, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS:

Alemtuzumab was effective in treating patients with CLL across the cytogenetic categories evaluated, but there were differences. In patients with CLL with 17p deletion quite favorable ORR, PFS, and OS were achieved.

INTERVENTION:

Trade Name: Mabthera Product Name: Rituximab Product Code: Rituximab Pharmaceutical Form: Intravenous infusion Other descriptive name: Rituximab Concentration unit: mg/m2 milligram(s)/square meter Concentration type: equal Concentration number: 375‐ Other descriptive name: Rituximab Concentration unit: mg/m2 milligram(s)/square meter Concentration type: equal Concentration number: 500‐ Trade Name: MabCampath Product Name: Alemtuzumab Product Code: Alemtuzumab Pharmaceutical Form: Intravenous infusion Other descriptive name: Alemtuzumab Concentration unit: mg milligram(s) Concentration type: equal Concentration number: 30‐

CONDITION:

Tretamiento de rescate con Rituximab‐CHOP seguido de Alemtuzumab en pacientes con elucemia linfática crónica refactarios o recaidos tras tratamiento con análogos de las purinas.

PRIMARY OUTCOME:

Main Objective: Tasa de respuestas globales obtenidas tras el régimen R‐CHOP seguido de consolidación con alemtuzumab como tratamiento de segunda línea. Primary end point(s): Tasa de respuestas globales obtenidas tras el régimen R‐CHOP seguido de consolidación con alemtuzumab como tratamiento de segunda línea Secondary Objective: 1.Determinar la tasa de respuestas completas moleculares tras el régimen R‐CHOP.; 2.Determinar la eficacia de alemtuzumab en mejorar la respuesta tras el régimen de R‐

CHOP:

conversión de RP a RC y de ERM+ a ERM‐; 3.Aplicabilidad (perfil de toxicidad) del tratamiento de consolidación con alemtuzumab; 4.Como objetivos adicionales se considerarán:; •Valor pronóstico de diferentes variables biológicas, (ZAP‐70 y citogenética), que influyen en la respuesta.; •Duración de la respuesta.; •Supervivencia libre de progresión.; •Supervivencia global.;

INCLUSION CRITERIA:

1.Consentimiento informado por escrito del paciente antes del inicio de cualquier procedimiento específico relacionado con el estudio. 2.Edad >18 años y < 70 años. 3.(ECOG) < 2. 4.Pacientes afectos de leucemia linfática crónica de acuerdo con los criterios diagnósticos establecidos (Apéndice A). 5.LLC activa definida por la existencia de uno ó más de los siguientes criterios: 5.1.‐ Síntomas relacionados: pérdida de peso > 10% en los últimos 6 meses, ó fiebre > 38 oC durante 2 semanas sin evidencia de infección, ó fatiga extrema, ó sudoración nocturna sin evidencia de infección. 5.2.‐ Adenopatías ó conglomerados adenopáticos gigantes (>10 cm. de diámetro) ó adenopatías de crecimiento progresivo. 5.3.‐ Esplenomegalia gigante (>6 cm por debajo del reborde costal) ó esplenomegalia progresiva. 5.4.‐ Linfocitosis progresiva (incremento > 50% en periodo de 2 meses) ó tiempo de duplicación linfocitaria (anticipado) < 6 meses 5.5.‐ Evid

Alemtuzumab (ALEM) is widely used as an induction therapy for organ transplantation, and numerous randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have been published to evaluate its efficacy and safety in kidney transplantation as compared with antithymocyte globulin (ATG). The purpose of this study was to compare the benefits and safety of ALEM with those of ATG for induction therapy.A systematic literature search in three electronic databases, including PubMed, EmBase, and Cochrane Library, since inception through October 2016, was conducted to identify potential RCTs for inclusion. Trials that investigated the risk of biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR), mortality, graft failure, delayed graft function (DGF), chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN), infections, cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections, new-onset diabetes mellitus after transplant (NODAT), and granulocyte colony stimulation factor (GCSF) use in kidney transplant recipients who received ALEM or ATG as an induction therapy were included. Relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random-effects model.Six RCTs involving 446 kidney transplantation patients were included in this meta-analysis. The effects of ALEM therapy were not significantly different from those of ATG therapy, including the incidence of BPAR (RR: 0.77; 95% CI.: 0.51-1.18; P = .229), mortality (RR: 0.64; 95% CI.: 0.30-1.39; P = .263), graft failure (RR: 0.81; 95% CI.: 0.49-1.33; P = .411), DGF (RR: 1.00; 95% CI.: 0.60-1.67; P = .999), CAN (RR: 1.42; 95% CI.: 0.44-4.57; P = .556), infections (RR: 1.00; 95% CI.: 0.74-1.35; P = .989), CMV infections (RR: 0.70; 95% CI.: 0.38-1.30; P = .263), NODAT (RR: 0.50; 95% CI.: 0.18-1.36; P = .174), and GCSF use (RR: 1.16; 95% CI.: 0.81-1.66; P = .413). Sensitivity analyses were consistent with the overall analysis for all effects except CAN, suggesting that the risk of CAN might be higher with ALEM therapy than ATG therapy (RR: 2.45; 95% CI.: 1.02-5.94; P = .046).The findings of this study suggest that the beneficial effects of ALEM therapy are greater than those of ATG therapy in kidney transplantation patients; however, the effects were not statistically significant because of the limited number of trials. Further large-scale RCTs are needed to verify the treatment effects of ALEM.

The humanized anti-CD52 monoclonal antibody alemtuzumab is an effective therapy for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). We examined the impact of alemtuzumab treatment after initial fludarabine treatment for feasibility and safety. Patients (N = 85) with previously untreated symptomatic CLL received fludarabine (25 mg/m(2)/day) for 5 days every 4 weeks for four cycles followed by 2 months of observation. Patients with stable disease or better response then received alemtuzumab 30 mg three times weekly for 6 weeks either intravenously (IV; cohort 1; N = 39) or subcutaneously (SC; cohort 2; N = 20). Of the 85 evaluable patients enrolled on our study, four (5%) attained a complete response (CR) and 43 (51%) attained a partial response after fludarabine induction for an overall response rate (ORR) of 55%. Thirty-nine patients received IV alemtuzumab for consolidation with improvement in CR to 27% and ORR to 73%. Twenty patients received SC alemtuzumab consolidation with improvement in CR to 17% and ORR to 69%. Toxicity from IV alemtuzumab included infusion-related reactions and infection. Mild local inflammation was common from SC alemtuzumab but there were virtually no systemic side effects. Nine of 59 (15%) patients had cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections; one patient died. The administration of alemtuzumab as consolidation therapy following an abbreviated fludarabine induction is feasible but requires close monitoring for CMV infection and other infectious events.

When the CAMMS 223 trial was formally reported in the New England Journal of Medicine in October of 2008, huge interest was generated in the media, among people with multiple sclerosis (MS) and their relatives and friends. The suggestion that a therapy Campath-1H (now known as alemtuzumab) was available which surpassed the effectiveness of current standard treatments, provided by infusions given at yearly intervals or even less frequently and which appeared to reduce the accumulation of disability was hailed in the lay press as virtually a 'cure'. The paper in this edition of the journal (Spotlight on Alemtuzumab, page 77) provides a more realistic account of alemtuzumab, describing the Cambridge experience, tracking the history of Campath-1H, one of the oldest humanized monoclonal antibodies, from its origin in the laboratory to its future licensing in the clinical management of people with MS.

Alemtuzumab, a humanized anti-CD52 monoclonal antibody, is used in patients with refractory chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL). We report results in health care with alemtuzumab on consecutive, advanced-stage patients from a well-defined geographical region. Records from 1,301 patients (Stockholm-Cancer-Registry 1991-2010) identified 56 relapsed/refractory patients treated with alemtuzumab. Median age was 69 years, 88 % had advanced Rai-stage with median 3 prior therapies. One fourth had bulky lymphadenopathy and 73 % were refractory to purine analogues. Median treatment length was 11.6 weeks. Median cumulative dose was 930 mg, significantly higher (p = 0.0277) for responders. Overall response-rate (ORR) was 43 %; 32.5 %, 50 % and 87.5 % in the Refractory, Purine analogue relapsed and Relapsed/Other subgroup, respectively. Response rate was significantly associated with subgroup (p = 0.0104). Good performance status (PS) was associated with better response rate (p = 0.0227). Median time-to-treatment-failure (TTF) (months) was 7.8 months, significantly (p < 0.0001) longer for responders (13.4) Major infections occurred in 36 %. Median overall survival was 22.5 months (range 0.4-74.3). Positive predictive factors were good PS (p < 0.0001) and fewer previous therapies (p = 0.0038). Twenty percent were retreated with alemtuzumab with an ORR of 54.5 %, and a TTF of 7.1 months. A high cumulative dose/longer duration of therapy and a relatively high response rate was observed compared to previous reports. Optimal patient identification and management may result in avoidance of early discontinuation and possibly better outcomes.

The purpose of this study is to treat prospectively documented clinic patients with treatment-refractory multiple sclerosis that are naïve to alemtuzumab. Alemtuzumab shows efficacy and rate of serious adverse events (SAEs) which is equivalent or better than standard of care treatment strategies used previously for treatment-refractory multiple sclerosis.