BACKGROUND:

The proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors are a new class of cholesterol-lowering medications that provide significant reductions in lipids but at a large cost relative to statins. With 2 such drugs now on the market, alirocumab and evolocumab, comparing the evidence base for these drugs is necessary for informed decision making.

OBJECTIVE:

To compare the benefits and harms of the PCSK9 inhibitors alirocumab and evolocumab.

METHODS:

The databases Ovid MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, SCOPUS, and ClinicalTrials.gov were used to search for randomized controlled trials of alirocumab or evolocumab with any relevant comparator reporting health outcomes, lipid outcomes, or harms through September 2015, and information was requested from manufacturers. Results were reviewed according to standard review methods.

RESULTS:

The database searches revealed 17 fair- and good-quality trials; however, none had primary health outcomes or directly compared PCSK9 inhibitors. Alirocumab (75 mg to 150 mg subcutaneously every 2 weeks) resulted in significantly greater reductions in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C; -8% to -67%) at 12-24 weeks in patients with (a) heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia and (b) patients at high or varied cardiovascular (CV) risk who were not at LDL-C goals with statin therapy. The highest strength evidence was for patients with high CV risk not at LDL-C goals. Alirocumab also resulted in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) increases of 6%-12%. Low- and moderate-strength evidence for adjudicated CV events at 52-78 weeks for a priori analyses indicated no benefit. Low- and moderate-strength evidence also found no differences in harms except possibly slightly more injection-site reactions. Evolocumab (120 mg subcutaneously every 2 weeks to 420 mg every 4 weeks) resulted in significantly greater reductions in LDL-C (-32% to -71%) at 12-52 weeks in patients with heterozygous or homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia, patients intolerant of statins, and patients with varied CV risk not at LDL-C goal with statin therapy. The highest strength evidence was for heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia and patients not at LDL-C goals. Moderate-strength evidence showed HDL-C increases in the range of 4.5%-6.8%. Harms were not different between groups, except possibly slightly greater overall adverse event reporting. Evidence on adjudicated CV outcomes was insufficient to draw conclusions because of sparseness of events, study limitations, and inability to assess consistency of findings.

CONCLUSIONS:

Alirocumab and evolocumab have evidence of large improvements in lipid levels. The strength of the evidence is greater for alirocumab than evolocumab in patients with high CV risk who were not at LDL-C target goals, while evidence for evolocumab is stronger in patients with heterogeneous familial hypercholesterolemia and patients with varied CV risk who were not at LDL-C target goals. Evidence on adjudicated CV outcomes for a priori analyses is unable to show benefit for alirocumab and is insufficient to draw conclusions for evolocumab. Important questions remain about the comparative effects on long-term health outcomes.

DISCLOSURES:

This project was funded by The Drug Effectiveness Review Project. Project participants reviewed the manuscript but had no role in conducting the work or writing the manuscript. Any comments received from the participants during the course of the review were taken at the discretion of the authors independently. All authors had access to the data and a role in writing the manuscript. McDonagh, Peterson, and Holzhammer declare no conflict of interest or financial interest in any therapy discussed in this article. Fazio declares receiving compensation from Sanofi for a presentation on his science to a group of their advisors and has served as a consultant to MSD, BASF, NHP, Sanofi, Ionis Pharmaceuticals, and Kowa. Study concept and design were primarily contributed by McDonagh, along with Peterson and Holzhammer, with assistance from Fazio. Holzhammer took the lead in data collection, with assistance from McDonagh and Peterson. Data interpretation was performed by McDonagh, Peterson, and Fazio. The manuscript was written by McDonagh, Peterson, and Fazio, with assistance from Holzhammer, and revised by all the authors.

OBJECTIVE:

To review the mechanism of action for PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies and critically evaluate the therapeutic potential of evolocumab and alirocumab in the treatment of hypercholesterolemia.

DATA SOURCES:

Ovid MEDLINE search from 1980 to August 2015 using the terms PCSK9, evolocumab, and alirocumab with forward and backward citation tracking.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION:

English-language trials and studies assessing the mechanism, efficacy, or safety of PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies were included.

DATA SYNTHESIS:

PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies have a potent ability to reduce low-density lipoprotein (LDL) by almost 50% in controlled trials: -47.49% (95% CI = -69.6% to -25.4%). They have an acceptable safety profile with no significant elevations in Creatine Kinase (CK) (odds ratio [OR] = 0.72; 95% CI = 0.54 to 0.96) or serious adverse events (OR = 1.01; 95% CI = 0.87 to 1.18), and preliminary evidence suggests reductions in myocardial infarction (OR = 0.49; 95% CI = 0.26 to 0.93). Although it is effective in several familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) patient types, it does not work in homozygous patients with dual allele LDL receptor negative polymorphisms or those who are homozygous for autosomal recessive hypercholesterolemia.

CONCLUSIONS:

Although not preferred over statins because of limited clinical trial evidence of cardiovascular event reductions, dosing convenience, and expense, PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies will have a prominent role to play in the treatment of hypercholesterolemia, especially in patients needing large LDL reductions, including patients with many types of FH.

BACKGROUND:

Hyperlipidemia or dyslipidemia has been a concern for a long time, with various guidelines emphasizing the importance of managing the lipid profile to prevent cardiac incidences. Although statins have been found to be highly effective, resistance and intolerability to side effects will continue to be a stumbling block for certain patients. Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors tackle lipid profile via a novel mechanism and therefore provide an additional effective option for managing lipid profile. The overarching aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the efficacy of evolocumab among various populations with hypercholesterolemia.

METHODS:

A comprehensive search was conducted in ProQuest Health & Medical Complete, Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, and PubMed to identify potential records; then titles, abstracts, and full texts were screened using the inclusion criteria to filter out irrelevant studies. Data extraction and quality assessment were undertaken using standardized tools and the results were narratively synthesized and presented in tables.

RESULTS:

Eight studies were included in this systematic review after screening 1191 records. All studies demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) values in the groups that received evolocumab compared with the comparator groups ( p < 0.05). The decline in LDL-C levels from baseline in the majority of studies ranged from 40% to 80%, whether used alone or in combination with other agents. Also, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, lipoprotein (a) and apolipoprotein B were improved with the use of evolocumab.

CONCLUSIONS:

This study helped to collate evidence from studies that tested the effectiveness of evolocumab in the management of hyperlipidemia. Evolocumab seems to be highly effective in reducing LDL-C and other lipid parameters. Hence, it provides an excellent alternative for patients with refractory disease or patients who develop intolerable side effects, therefore helping to overcome the stumbling block to achieving optimal lipid management.

Proprotein convertase subtilisin-kexin type 9 (PCSK9) is a member of regulatory serine proteases which is mostly expressed in liver. In the physiological condition, LDL-C binds to LDL receptors (LDLRs) and via endocytosis, LDLRs are degraded. PCSK9 binds to the epidermal growth factor-like repeat A (EGFA) domain of extracellular LDLRs, and then physiological recycling of LDLRs from surface of liver is cancelled, resulting in elevation of circulating LDL-C in plasma. To evaluate whether evolucomab, as PCSK9 inhibitor monoclonal antibody, ameliorates lipid profile in familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) patients, this meta-analysis has been conducted. PubMed, Web of Science (ISI) and Scopus databases were searched for studies which had investigated the efficacy of evolucomab. Types of outcome investigated were percentage changes from baseline of the lipid profile. Our meta-analysis shows that evolucomab at the dosage of 420 mg monthly could decrease LDL-C  by 54.71%, TC by 35.08%, VLDL-C by 28.37 %, ratio of TC to HDL-C by 39.14 %, triglycerides by 12.11 %, and increased HDL-C by 6.06% from baseline compared to placebo at the end of study in FH patients. Our findings indicate that evolocumab could be a hopeful agent for challenging patients, such as statin intolerance or patients who fail to attain the target goal of LDL-C despite consumption of maximum doses of statins. This article is open to POST-PUBLICATION REVIEW. Registered readers (see "For Readers") may comment by clicking on ABSTRACT on the issue's contents page.

BACKGROUND:

Patients with type 2 diabetes have increased cardiovascular risk. PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies have been shown to reduce LDL cholesterol and other lipids, but specific efficacy for patients with diabetes is unknown. We compared the effect of the PCSK9 inhibitor evolocumab on lipid parameters in patients with and without type 2 diabetes.

METHODS:

We did a random-effects meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials comparing the efficacy of evolocumab, placebo, and ezetimibe to improve lipid parameters in adult patients (age 18-80 years) with or without type 2 diabetes. We searched MEDLINE and Embase to identify eligible 12-week, phase 3 trials published between Jan 1, 2012, and Feb 28, 2015. We excluded trials that included patients who had homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia. All analyses were based on individual participant data. We used DerSimonian and Laird random-effects meta-analyses to compare the mean changes from baseline in concentrations of LDL cholesterol, non-HDL cholesterol, total cholesterol, triglycerides, lipoprotein(a), and HDL cholesterol at 12 weeks for evolocumab, placebo, and ezetimibe. We also assessed the effect of evolocumab therapy compared with placebo across subgroups of patients based on glycaemia, insulin use, renal function, and cardiovascular disease status at baseline.

RESULTS:

Three trials met our inclusion criteria, and included 413 patients with type 2 diabetes and 2119 patients without type 2 diabetes. In patients with type 2 diabetes evolocumab caused mean reductions in LDL cholesterol concentration that were 60% (95% CI 51-69) versus placebo and 39% (32-47) versus ezetimibe. In patients without type 2 diabetes, evolocumab caused mean reductions in LDL cholesterol that were 66% (62-70) versus placebo and 40% (36-45) versus ezetimibe. In patients with type 2 diabetes, evolocumab was associated with reductions in non-HDL cholesterol (55% [47-63] vs placebo and 34% [26-41] vs ezetimibe), total cholesterol (38% [32-44] vs placebo and 24% [16-31] vs ezetimibe), and lipoprotein(a) (31% [25-37] vs placebo and 26% [16-35] vs ezetimibe), and an increase in HDL cholesterol (7% [4-11] vs placebo and 8% [4-13] vs ezetimibe). Findings were similar across diabetes subgroups based on glycaemia, insulin use, renal function, and cardiovascular disease status.

INTERPRETATION:

Evolocumab markedly reduces atherogenic lipoproteins in patients with type 2 diabetes, an effect that is consistent across subgroups and similar to that seen in patients without type 2 diabetes. Results from ongoing cardiovascular outcome trials of PCSK9 inhibitors will provide additional data to inform the use of these drugs in patients with type 2 diabetes.

FUNDING:

Amgen.

AIMS:

Prior trials with monoclonal antibodies to proprotein convertase subtilizin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) reported robust low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) reductions. However, the ability to detect potentially beneficial changes in other lipoproteins such as lipoprotein (a), triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and apolipoprotein (Apo) A1, and adverse events (AEs) was limited by sample sizes of individual trials. We report a pooled analysis from four phase 2 studies of evolocumab (AMG 145), a monoclonal antibody to PCSK9.

METHODS AND RESULTS:

The trials randomized 1359 patients to various doses of subcutaneous evolocumab every 2 weeks (Q2W) or 4 weeks (Q4W), placebo, or ezetimibe for 12 weeks; 1252 patients contributed to efficacy and 1314, to safety analyses. Mean percentage (95% CI) reductions in LDL-C vs. placebo ranged from 40.2% (44.6%, 35.8%) to 59.3% (63.7%, 54.8%) among the evolocumab groups (all P < 0.001). Statistically significant reductions in apolipoprotein B (Apo B), non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C), triglycerides and lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)], and increases in HDL-C were also observed. Adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs with evolocumab were reported in 56.8 and 2.0% of patients, compared with 49.2% and 1.2% with placebo. Adjudicated cardiac and cerebrovascular events were reported in 0.3 and 0% in the placebo and 0.9 and 0.3% in the evolocumab arms, respectively.

CONCLUSION:

In addition to LDL-C reduction, evolocumab, dosed either Q2W or Q4W, demonstrated significant and favourable changes in other atherogenic and anti-atherogenic lipoproteins, and was well tolerated over the 12-week treatment period.

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the size of myocardial infarct between evolocumab and control groups in patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction who undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI). All study participants will undergo a cardiac MRI 4 weeks after primary reperfusion. The evolocumab group will receive 420 mg before PCI via subcutaneous injection.

The level of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) reflects the cholesterol carried mainly by low-density lipoprotein particles (LDL-P). LDL-C, however, does not always correlate with LDL-P because of the variable amounts of cholesterol per particle. Consideration of LDL-P concentrations in addition to LDL-C may help guide therapeutic decisions in a select number of patients. Evolocumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody directed against proprotein convertase subtilisin-kexin type 9 that lowers both LDL-C and cardiovascular events. To evaluate the effect of evolocumab on serum levels and size of lipoprotein particles, we conducted a post hoc subanalysis of 619 patients from the Durable Effect of PCSK9 Antibody Compared with Placebo Study or DESCARTES trial, a 52-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, global study of patients with hyperlipidemia. At baseline, mean LDL-P concentration was 1077 nmol/L for the placebo group and 1100 nmol/L for the evolocumab group. In patients receiving evolocumab, week 52 total LDL-P concentration decreased to 610 nmol/L, a treatment difference of 50% versus placebo. Evolocumab also reduced concentrations of medium very low-density lipoprotein particles (VLDL-P), small VLDL-P, and intermediate-density lipoprotein particle: median (Q1, Q3) changes were -15.2% (-48, 48), -29% (-54, 18), and -36% (-70, 22), respectively. Mean (95% confidence interval) % changes in total LDL particle size in the evolocumab group was -1.7 (-2.0, -1.4); % changes in HDL and VLDL particle sizes were 1.1 (0.7, 1.5) and 8.7 (7.0, 10.5), respectively. Changes in total LDL, HDL, and VLDL particle sizes (vs placebo) were all significant (p <0.001). In conclusion, evolocumab significantly lowers atherogenic lipoprotein particles including low-density and remnant lipoproteins.

This is a prospective observational registry study to evaluate fetal, infant and childhood outcomes in women exposed to evolocumab during pregnancy

Background and Aims: Evolocumab, a proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitor, is indicated for the reduction of cardiovascular (CV) risk by lowering low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). We assessed the cost-effectiveness of evolocumab added to optimized standard of care (SoC), i.e. maximally tolerated statin with ezetimibe, in patients with Familial Hypercholesterolemia (FH) in Belgium. Methods: A previously published Markov model was adapted to the Belgian context. Patient characteristics, aligned with reimbursement criteria, were taken from a cohort of Belgian patients with FH. Baseline CV event (myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, CV death) rates, utilities and costs were taken from published sources. The model used an evolocumab LDL-C reduction of 59%, as observed in the FOURIER trial, and the relationship between LDL-C lowering and CV event reduction from the Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ Collaboration (CTTC) 2010 meta-analysis. An annual cost of evolocumab of €5,440 was utilized, based on its list price (before any potential discounts). Costs and health outcomes were evaluated over a lifetime horizon from payer perspective. Results: In primary prevention (PP) patients with FH and LDL-C ≥130 mg/dL, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was €45,484. In secondary prevention (SP) patients with FH and LDL-C ≥100 mg/dL, the ICER was €36,627. In a combined PP (24%) and SP (76%) population, weighted according to evolocumab use observed in Belgium, the ICER was €38,770 (see table). [Formula presented] Conclusions: In Belgian patients with FH eligible for reimbursement, the addition of evolocumab to optimized SoC results in an ICER below generally accepted willingness-to-pay thresholds by Belgian authorities and may be considered cost-effective.