Wound healing and infection in nail matrix phenolization wounds. Does topical medication make a difference?

Autores
Categoria Primary study
RevistaJournal of the American Podiatric Medical Association
Year 2001
Loading references information
After nail matrix ablation using phenolization, a medicated wound dressing (10% povidone iodine), an amorphous hydrogel dressing (Intrasite Gel), and a control dressing (paraffin gauze) were evaluated. Forty-two participants, randomly divided into three dressing groups, were evaluated. Healing time did not differ between the 10% povidone iodine (33 days), amorphous hydrogel (33 days), and the control dressing (34 days). For all groups, the clinical infection rate was lower than in previous studies, and there was no clinical difference between groups (one infection in the povidone iodine and control groups; none in the amorphous hydrogel group). However, in the amorphous hydrogel group, other complications, such as hypergranulation, were more likely. This investigation indicated that medicated or hydrogel dressings did not enhance the rate of healing or decrease infection rates.
Epistemonikos ID: 16746759242d96508aa99230a11e2e50f5038d19
First added on: Apr 22, 2012