Primary studies included in this systematic review

loading
16 articles (16 References) loading Revert Studify

Primary study

Unclassified

期刊 Psychopharmacology bulletin
Year 1993
Loading references information
同意精神分裂症患者年龄从18岁到63岁不等的退出抗精神病药物治疗至少1周,随机分配接受相同的胶囊,硫利达嗪组(n = 13),吗茚酮组(n = 10),氟哌啶醇组(n = 12)最低6周。的molindone和氟哌啶醇治疗的患者相比,硫利达嗪治疗的患者均显著改善随着时间的推移,简明精神病评定量表(BPRS),汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAM-D)的总成绩作为衡量。在BPRS评分的改善主要是由于焦虑和抑郁症状的改善。的主题没有其他措施,一个重要的例外的重量。吗茚酮的患者,平均瘦了5斤多了6个星期的治疗,而硫利达嗪的患者获得了6斤。氟哌啶醇治疗的患者没有明显的体重变化。

Primary study

Unclassified

期刊 The Journal of clinical psychiatry
Year 1993
Loading references information

Primary study

Unclassified

作者 Glazer WM , Hafez H
期刊 Schizophrenia research
Year 1991
Loading references information
实验方法用于比较两个精神病药物的掩蔽效应 - 吗茚酮和氟哌啶醇 - 18抗精神病药物治疗的精神分裂症患者表现出操作上定义的戒断迟发性运动障碍加剧。一个星期后,这两种药物在预先确定的前期研究精神病的剂量相当于一个,molindone屏蔽的总的目标分数显著较少(12%)比氟哌啶醇(27%)。同样地,在第二周时,这些抗精神病药的剂量相当于200%的预研究剂量,吗茚酮掩蔽总AIMS得分显着较少(23%)相比,氟哌啶醇(53%)。这一发现被认为有几种解释。这项研究表明,可行性的一种方法,可以提供一个模型,了解精神病药物的药理差异。

Primary study

Unclassified

期刊 The Journal of clinical psychiatry
Year 1985
Loading references information
吗茚酮和氟哌啶醇的疗效比较,通过注射的第2-3天的住院治疗,然后继续口服至4周,从正在进行的双盲研究报道。简明精神病评定量表,临床总体印象,治疗时出现的症状量表,以及目标症状评价疗效和副作用进行了评估。第35例患者进入研究的基础上的分析表明,这两种药物是有效的,良好的耐受性。有轻微的优势,早在注射阶段的治疗和molindone氟哌啶醇晚在口头部分的研究,但这些差异并不具有临床意义。发现两种药物之间无显着差异副作用。

Primary study

Unclassified

期刊 Current Therapeutic Research
Year 1982
Loading references information
注射吗茚酮(12.5-250毫克/天,4-7天)和可注射的氟哌啶醇(2.5-80毫克/天,2-20天)均有效治疗16急性搅拌精神分裂症患者。整体,功效和副作用经验没有显著2种药物之间的不同,虽然较大的改进上出现一些项目得分对目标症状量表,包括不合作,紧张状态,和敌对的茚酮组中出现更迅速。 (12 REF)

Primary study

Unclassified

作者 Binder R , Glick I , Rice M
期刊 The Journal of clinical psychiatry
Year 1981
Loading references information
这项研究比较了肌肉注射吗茚酮肌注氟哌啶醇,一个新的抗精神病药物疗效。吗茚酮似乎是的疗效与氟哌啶醇敏锐地激动,精神病患者。

Primary study

Unclassified

期刊 Current Therapeutic Research
Year 1977
Loading references information
Compared the im preparation of molindone with im trifluoperazine in maximum doses of 100 mg and 16 mg each day, respectively, in 20 chronic schizophrenic inpatients (mean age 41 yrs) in acute exacerbation. Effects of the 2 injectable drugs were evaluated at baseline, and at the end of 1 wk of medication, using the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale, Clinical Global Impressions, Nurses' Observation Scale for Inpatient Evaluation, and independent global ratings. Evaluation of the pooled global ratings of improvement and analysis of covariance of the psychometric measurements showed that molindone injectable displayed clinical efficacy equal to the im preparation of the reference compound, trifluoperazine. In the doses given, molindone showed a trend toward exhibiting greater incidence of extrapyramidal symptoms and akathesia, while trifluoperazine induced more drowsiness. Both im drugs were very well tolerated with respect to local tissue reaction.

Primary study

Unclassified

作者 Serafetinides EA
期刊 Diseases of the nervous system
Year 1973
Loading references information

Primary study

Unclassified

作者 Simpson GM , Amin M , Edwards JG
期刊 The Journal of clinical pharmacology and new drugs
Year 1972
Loading references information

Primary study

Unclassified

期刊 International pharmacopsychiatry
Year 1971
Loading references information