Systematic reviews including this primary study

loading
4 articles (5 References) Revert Studify

Systematic review

Unclassified

作者 Tan X , Li Y , Xi J , Guo S , Su H , Chen X , Liang X
期刊 Medicine
Year 2021
Loading references information
Background: Antipseudomonal b-lactams have been used for the treatment of febrile neutropenia (FN); however, the efficacy and safety of antipseudomonal b-lactams in pediatric patients remain unclear. The aim of this study was to comprehensively compare the efficacy and side effects of optional antipseudomonal b-lactams for pediatric FN. Methods: PubMed, Embase, Medline, and Cochrane Library were systematically searched from their inception to December 18, 2020. Eligible randomized controlled trials in which pediatric FN patients were treated with an empiric monotherapy of antipseudomonal b-lactams were selected. Data synthesis was performed using WinBUGS 14.0 software and meta packages implemented in R 3.6.2. Random-effects network meta-analysis was performed, and dichotomous data were pooled as odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals. The primary outcome was treatment success without modification; the secondary outcomes were adverse events (AEs), all-cause mortality, and new infections. The GRADE tool was used to assess the quality of the evidence. The protocol was registered with PROSPERO ID CRD42021226763. Results: Eighteen studies with 2517 patients were included. The results showed no statistically significant difference between the optional antipseudomonal b-lactams in the outcomes of treatment success without modification, all AEs, all-cause mortality, and new infections for pediatric FN. Based on the results of Bayesian rank probability, meropenem was ranked highest among all the treatment options with regard to treatment success without modification benefit; ceftazidime and meropenem were associated with a lower risk of AEs; cefoperazone/sulbactam and piperacillin/tazobactam were associated with a lower risk of mortality, and piperacillin/ tazobactam and meropenem were associated with a lower risk of new infections. The quality of evidence was moderate. Conclusions: Meropenem and piperacillin/tazobactam were found to be better with regard to treatment success without modification, with a comparable safety profile. Therefore, our findings support the use of meropenem and piperacillin/tazobactam as a treatment option for pediatric FN patients. Copyright © 2021 the Author(s).

Publication Thread

This thread includes 2 references

Systematic review

Unclassified

期刊 Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology
Year 2016
Loading references information
背景技术在负压伤口治疗(NPWT)中,用气密敷料覆盖伤口,施加负压。这被认为是促进愈合。我们对文献进行了更新,系统的综述评估了NPWT。方法:我们系统地搜索PubMed和Cochrane图书馆数据库,用于治疗急性或慢性伤口的NPWT的随机对照试验(RCT)。主要结果是完全伤口闭合。结果:除了早期IQWiG对本主题的评论之外,我们还发现了9项RCT的报告。 9项新试验中有5项涉及不在市场上的NPWT系统。在9份新报告中只有5项说明完全伤口关闭的频率。仅有两项试验发现有利于NPWT的统计学显着效果.9项新试验中的8项研究结果难以解释,因为明显偏倚,并且因为多种类型的伤口得到治疗。结论:虽然NPWT可能有积极作用,但我们没有发现明显的证据表明,NPWT伤口愈合愈合比常规治疗好。仍然需要良好的RCT来评估NPWT。