Systematic reviews including this primary study

loading
3 articles (3 References) loading Revert Studify

Systematic review

Unclassified

期刊 Evidence Report/Technology Assessment
Year 2016
Loading references information
OBJECTIVES: To update a prior systematic review on the effects of omega-3 fatty acids (n-3 FA) on maternal and child health and to assess the evidence for their effects on, and associations with, additional outcomes. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE®, Embase®, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Centre for Agriculture and Biosciences (CAB) Abstracts from 2000 to August 2015; eligible studies from the original report; and relevant systematic reviews. REVIEW METHODS: We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of any defined dose of n-3 FA (or combination) compared to placebo, any other n-3 FA, or alternative dose with an outcome of interest conducted in pregnant or breastfeeding women or neonates (preterm or term). We also included prospective observational studies that analyzed the association between baseline n-3 FA intake or biomarker level and followup outcomes. Postnatal interventions began within a week of birth for term infants and within a week of beginning enteral or oral feeding for preterm infants. Standard methods were used for data abstraction and analysis, according to the Evidence-based Practice Center Methods Guide. RESULTS: We identified 4,275 potentially relevant titles from our searches, of which 95 RCTs and 48 observational studies met the inclusion criteria. Risk of bias was a concern with both RCTs and observational studies. Outcomes for which evidence was sufficient to draw a conclusion are summarized here with the Strength of Evidence (SoE). (Outcomes for which the evidence was insufficient to draw a conclusion are summarized in Appendix G of the report.). Maternal Exposures and Outcomes: Gestational length and risk for preterm birth: Prenatal algal docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) or DHA-enriched fish oil supplementation had a small positive effect on length of gestation (moderate SoE), but no effect on risk for preterm birth (low SoE). Prenatal EPA (eicosapentaenoic acid) plus DHA-containing fish oil supplementation has no effect on length of gestation (low SoE). Supplementation with DHA, or EPA plus DHA-, or DHA-enriched fish oil does not decreaserisk for preterm birth (low SoE). Birth weight and risk for low birth weight: Changes in maternal n-3 FA biomarkers were significantly associated with birth weight. Prenatal algal DHA or DHA-enriched fish oil supplementation had a positive effect on birth weight among healthy term infants (moderate SoE), but prenatal DHA supplementation had no effect on risk for low birth weight (low SoE). Prenatal EPA plus DHA or alpha-linolenic acid (ALA) supplementation had no effect on birth weight (low SoE). Risk for peripartum depression: Maternal n-3 FA biomarkers had no association with risk for peripartum depression. Maternal DHA, EPA, or DHA-enriched fish oil supplementation had no effect on risk for peripartum depression (low SoE). Risk for gestational hypertension/preeclampsia: Prenatal DHA supplementation among high-risk pregnant women had no effect on the risk for gestational hypertension or preeclampsia (moderate SoE). Prenatal supplementation of any n-3 FA in normal-risk women also had no significant effect on risk for gestational hypertension or preeclampsia (low SoE). Fetal, Infant, and Child Exposures and Outcomes: Postnatal growth patterns: Maternal fish oil or DHA plus EPA supplementation had no effect on postnatal growth patterns (attainment of weight, length, and head circumference) when administered prenatally (moderate SoE) or both pre- and postnatally (low SoE). Fortification of infant formulas with DHA plus arachidonic acid (AA, an n-6 FA) had no effect on growth patterns of preterm or term infants (low SoE). Visual acuity: Prenatal supplementation with DHA had no effect on development of visual acuity (low SoE). Supplementing or fortifying preterm infant formula with any n-3 FA had no significant effect on visual acuity assessed by visual evoked potentials (VEP) at 4 or 6 months corrected age (low SoE). Data conflicted on the effectiveness of supplementing infant formula for term infants with n-3 FA depending on when and how visual acuity was assessed (i.e. by VEP or by behavioral methods) and the type of essential FA provided (low SoE). Neurological development: Prenatal or postnatal n-3 FA supplementation had no consistent effect on neurological development (low SoE). Cognitive development: Prenatal DHA supplementation with AA or EPA had no effect on cognitive development (moderate SoE). Supplementing breastfeeding women with DHA plus EPA also had no effect on cognitive development in infants and children (low SoE). Supplementing or fortifying preterm infants' formula with DHA plus AA had a positive effect on infant cognition at some short-term followup times (moderate SoE). Supplementing or fortifying infant formula for term infants with any n-3 FA had no effect on cognitive development (low SoE). Evidence is insufficient to support any effect of n-3 FA infant supplementation on long-term cognitive outcomes. Autism spectrum disorder, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and learning disorders: Maternal or infant n-3 FA supplementation had no effect on risk for autism spectrum disorders or ADHD (low SoE). No studies on other learning disorders were identified. Atopic dermatitis (AD), allergies, and respiratory disorders: Pre- and postnatal (maternal and infant) n-3 FA supplementation had no consistent effect on the risk for AD/eczema, allergies, asthma, and other respiratory illnesses (moderate SoE). Biomarkers and intakes had no consistent association with the risk for AD, allergies, and respiratory disorders (low SoE). Adverse events: Prenatal and infant supplementation with n-3 FA or fortification of foods with n-3 FA did not result in any serious or nonserious adverse events (moderate SoE); with the exception of an increased risk for mild gastrointestinal symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Most studies in this report examined the effects of fish oil (or other combinations of DHA and EPA) supplements on pregnant or breastfeeding women or the effects of infant formula fortified with DHA plus AA. As with the original report, with the exception of small increases in birth weight and length of gestation,n-3 FA supplementation or fortification has no consistent evidence of effects on peripartum maternal or infant health outcomes. No effects of n-3 FA were seen on gestational hypertension, peripartum depression, or postnatal growth. Apparent effects of n-3 FA supplementation were inconsistent across assessment methods and followup times for outcomes related to infant visual acuity, cognitive development and prevention of allergy and asthma. Future RCTs need to assess standardized preparations of n-3 and n-6 FA, using a select group of clinically important outcomes, on populations with baseline n-3 FA intakes typical of those of most western populations.

Systematic review

Unclassified

期刊 Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Year 2015
Loading references information
背景技术高流量鼻插管(HFNC)是小型,薄型,锥形的双层管,其在大于1L / min的气流中输送氧气或混合氧气/空气。 HFNC越来越多地被用作早产儿的非侵入性呼吸支持的形式。目的:比较HFNC与早产儿其他形式的非侵入性呼吸支持的安全性和有效性。搜索方法:我们使用Cochrane新生儿评估小组的标准搜索策略,通过PubMed(1966年至2016年1月1日),EMBASE(1980年至2016年1月1日)搜索Cochrane对照试验中心登记册(CENTRAL 2016年第1期) )和CINAHL(1982年至2016年1月1日)。我们还搜索临床试验数据库,会议记录和随机对照试验和准随机试验的检索文章参考清单。选择标准:随机或准随机试验,比较HFNC与其他非侵入性形式的早产儿呼吸支持在出生后或拔管后立即。数据收集和分析:作者提取和分析数据,计算风险比,风险差异和治疗额外有益结果所需的数量。主要结果:我们确定了15项研究纳入审查。干预比较(鼻持续气道正压(CPAP),鼻间歇正压通气(NIPPV),非加湿HFNC,输送HFNC模型),所用气体流量和呼吸支持适应症(主要支持)从出生后不久,拔管后支持,从CPAP支持断奶)。出生后与CPAP(4项研究,439名婴儿)相比,作为主要呼吸系统使用时,主要死亡结局无差异(典型风险比(RR)0.36,95%CI 0.01〜8.73; 4项研究,439例婴儿)或慢性肺部疾病(CLD)(典型RR 2.07,95%CI 0.64至6.64; 4项研究,439名婴儿)。 HFNC使用导致更长的呼吸支持持续时间,但其他次要结果没有差异。一项研究(75名婴儿)显示HFNC和NIPPV之间没有差异作为主要支持。拔管后(共6项研究,934例婴儿),主要死亡结局(典型RR 0.77,95%CI 0.43〜1.36,5项研究,896例婴儿)或CLD(典型RR 0.96, 95%CI 0.78至1.18; 5项研究,893名婴儿)。治疗失败率(典型RR 1.21,95%CI 0.95〜1.55,5例研究,786例婴儿)或再次插管(典型RR 0.91,95%CI 0.68〜1.20; 6例研究,934例婴儿)无差异。随机分入HFNC的婴儿减少鼻创伤(典型RR 0.64,95%CI 0.51〜0.79;典型风险差异(RD)-0.14,95%CI -0.20〜-0.08; 4项研究,645名婴儿)。在用HFNC治疗的婴儿中,气胸率(典型RR 0.35,95%CI 0.11至1.06;典型RD -0.02,95%CI -0.03至-0.00; 5名研究896名婴儿)的发生率略有下降。亚组分析发现,不同孕龄亚组早产儿HFNC与CPAP的主要结局差异无统计学意义,但早产儿和晚产儿只有少数。一项试验(28名婴儿)发现湿润和非加湿HFNC的再次插管率相似,另外两项试验(100名婴儿)发现用于递送加湿HFNC的不同设备型号之间没有差异。对于从非侵入性呼吸支持(CPAP)断奶的婴儿,两项研究(149名婴儿)发现,随机分配到HFNC的早产儿住院时间与停留在CPAP上的婴儿相比有所减少。作者的结论:HFNC在早产儿其他形式的非侵入性呼吸支持中具有相似的效力,用于预防治疗失败,死亡和CLD。大多数证据可用于使用HFNC作为拔管后支持。拔管后,HFNC与鼻腔外伤相关,与鼻CPAP相比可能与气胸减少有关。应该在早产儿进行进一步充分的动力随机对照试验,将HFNC与出生后的其他形式的初级非侵入性支持进行比较,并从非侵入性支持断奶。还需要进一步的证据来评估HFNC在极早产和轻度早产亚组中的安全性和有效性,并用于比较不同的HFNC装置。

Systematic review

Unclassified

期刊 Progress in lipid research
Year 2015
Loading references information
背景技术腰背痛是一种常见且昂贵的健康投诉,其中有几项适度有效的治疗方法。在某些领域有证据表明资助者和财务冲突与试验结果相关。背痛试验的影响尺寸是否与日记影响因素有关,报告利益冲突或报告资金尚不清楚。方法:我们对2006-2012年间公布的非特异性腰痛治疗随机对照试验的英文论文进行了系统综述。我们使用五年期期刊影响因子和利益冲突报告类别以及报告资金类别(报告没有报告和报告一些相比没有报告这些),使用元回归,调整样本量来建模关系,以及出版年我们还考虑了影响因素是否可以通过结果的方向或试样的大小进行预测。结果:在符合我们纳入标准的146项试验中,我们可以抽取数据来计算效应大小。效应大小与影响因素,资金来源报告或报告利益冲突无关。然而,明确报告“无试用资金”与效应大小的绝对值较大(调整后的β= 1.02(95%CI为0.44至1.59),P = 0.001)强烈相关。试验样本量的单位增加影响因子增加0.008(0.004〜0.012)(P <0.001),但LBP试验结果报告方向没有差异(P = 0.270)。结论:效应规模与影响因素,报告资金来源和利益冲突之间没有关联,反映了研究和出版商在该领域的行为。强有力的证据表明,效应大小绝对大小与明确报告“无资金”之间存在很大关联,这表明无资金审判的作者可能会报告较大的影响大小,尽管有方向。这可能在一定程度上与质量,资源和/或实际的审判有关。