A prospective randomized, controlled trial comparing synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure as modes of extubation.

Machine translation Machine translation
类别 Primary study
期刊Pediatrics
Year 2001
Loading references information
目的:确定是否同步鼻间歇正压通气(SNIPPV)经鼻持续气道正压通气(NCPAP)在通风早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征(RDS)相比,减少拔管失败。
方法:婴幼儿 / = 0.5毫升/公斤/厘米高(2)O 70厘米高(2)O / L / S),成功拔管93%,( 27 29)在SNIPPV组和NCPAP组的60%(15 25)。当重量被控制在拔管时间,成功的几率在SNIPPV组分别为21.1倍(95%可信区间:3.4,130.1)比NCPAP组。
的结论:SNIPPV是比NCPAP在断奶婴儿RDS脱离呼吸机更有效。,PFT可能是有用的预测拔管成功。
Epistemonikos ID: 70c688f7630f42b175c39365781bf47d02176cab
First added on: Dec 16, 2012
Warning
This is a machine translation from an article in Epistemonikos.

Machine translations cannot be considered reliable in order to make health decisions.

See an official translation in the following languages: English

If you prefer to see the machine translation we assume you accept our terms of use