[The comparative costs of vancomycin treatment versus teicoplanin in osteoarticular infection caused by methicillin-resistant staphylococci]

Machine translation Machine translation
类别 Primary study
期刊Pathologie-biologie
Year 2001
連結 Pubmed, DOI

此文章收錄於 2 Systematic reviews Systematic reviews (2 references)

Loading references information
此项临床研究比较和经济两个疗程即糖肽，万古霉素在骨关节涉及耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌感染的治疗和替考拉宁。随机化后，15例（1组）接获万古霉素（每克23 F）在连续输注通过一个中央静脉导管，15人（第2组）肌肉注射替考拉宁（311-357 F是400毫克小瓶）。临床研究主要集中在一住院治疗性设定，以及在非住院之一。成本分析，包括对抗生素的总开支的重点，对抗生素和抗生素所引起的并发症的医疗设备的使用。每名患者的总费用平均为8744与万古霉素与替考拉宁和8555楼（NS）的楼。这些明显的钱用一个廉价的抗生素（如万古霉素储蓄）是发生在一个虚幻的占如医疗设备的费用，需要管理万古霉素及并发症，由于这些设备的使用中心静脉导管。
This translation has been produced by an automated software. If you wish to submit your own translation, please send it to translations@epistemonikos.org
Epistemonikos ID: 98687f4dc23115c2ae87518ba2e749998de4adca
First added on: Jun 08, 2011
Warning
This is a machine translation from an article in Epistemonikos.

Machine translations cannot be considered reliable in order to make health decisions.

See an official translation in the following languages: English

If you prefer to see the machine translation we assume you accept our terms of use