Safety and efficacy of digoxin: systematic review and meta-analysis of observational and controlled trial data.

Machine translation Machine translation
类别 Systematic review
期刊BMJ (Clinical research ed.)
Year 2015
連結 Pubmed, DOI, PubMed Central

此文書包括 42 Primary studies 41 Primary studies (42 references)

This article is part of the following matrixes of evidence:
Loading references information
颈痛是英国四大最常报道的肌肉骨骼疾病之一。关于哪个单独的颈部疼痛患者继续有复发，持续或不能治疗的颈部疼痛知之甚少。非特异性颈部症状的发展和持续性被认为与多种因素有关。这项系统评估调查了可能构成患有非特异性颈部疼痛的患者复发，持续或不能治疗的问题的预后因素。它包括至少1年随访期的前瞻性研究，并排除了横断面和病例对照研究。包括九项研究。八个被评估为高质量和一个质量较差。这项审查发现有很强的证据表明与老年人相关的不利结果，目前的颈痛发作时间较长，以前的颈部问题，共存的肩部问题和其他肌肉骨骼疾病。有矛盾的证据表明疼痛和残疾的基线测量预测结果。有强有力的证据表明，定期运动预测会有很好的结果。关于预后指标的这一证据可以指导临床医生提供咨询或治疗，这可能有助于预防持续的颈部问题。没有高质量的研究调查心理和社会人口学因素的预测性质。这对临床实践和研究都有影响。
This translation has been produced by an automated software. If you wish to submit your own translation, please send it to translations@epistemonikos.org
Epistemonikos ID: a3d59c2f2727780c04c7d06d20815bd5e7a2a36b
First added on: Sep 02, 2015
Warning
This is a machine translation from an article in Epistemonikos.

Machine translations cannot be considered reliable in order to make health decisions.

See an official translation in the following languages: English

If you prefer to see the machine translation we assume you accept our terms of use