HYCOVID
5 Documents
Close
5 References ( articles) loading Revert Studify

Primary study

Unclassified

Registry of Trials clinicaltrials.gov
Year 2020
Loading references information
A new human coronavirus responsible for pneumonia, SARS-CoV-2, emerged in China in December 2019 and has spread rapidly. COVID-19, the disease caused by this virus, has a very polymorphous clinical presentation, which ranges from upper respiratory tract infections to acute respiratory distress syndrome. It may appear serious straightaway or may evolve in two stages, with a worsening 7 to 10 days after the first clinical signs, potentially linked to a cytokine storm and accompanied by a high risk of thrombosis. The global mortality rate of COVID-19 is between 3% and 4%, with severe forms being more frequent among older patients. Management is symptomatic as no antiviral treatment has demonstrated any clinical benefit in this condition. Hydroxychloroquine is a derivative of chloroquine commonly used in some autoimmune diseases, such as systemic lupus erythematosus. It is active in vitro in cellular models of infection by many viruses such as HIV, hepatitis C or SARS-CoV. However, its interest in viral infections in humans has not been demonstrated. Very recently, a preliminary uncontrolled study evaluated the effect of hydroxychloroquine on viral shedding in subjects with COVID-19. Among 20 patients treated with hydroxychloroquine at a dose of 600 mg per day, the percentage of patients with detectable SARS-CoV-2 RNA in the nasopharynx decreased from 100% at inclusion (start of treatment) to 43% six days later. In comparison, 15 of 16 untreated patients had a positive RT-PCR six days after inclusion. Furthermore, hydroxychloroquine has immunomodulating and anti-inflammatory properties, which could theoretically prevent or limit secondary worsening. The research hypothesis is that treatment with hydroxychloroquine improves prognosis and reduces the risk of death or use for invasive ventilation in patients with COVID-19.

Primary study

Unclassified

Loading references information
BackgroundThe efficacy of hydroxychloroquine in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) remains controversial. MethodsWe conducted a multicentre randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial evaluating hydroxychloroquine in COVID-19 patients with at least one of the following risk factors for worsening: age [≥]75 years, age between 60 and 74 years, and presence of at least one comorbidity, or need for supplemental oxygen ([≤]3 L/min). Eligible patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either 800mg hydroxychloroquine on Day 0 followed by 400mg per day for 8 days or a placebo. The primary endpoint was a composite of death or tracheal intubation within 14 days following randomization. Secondary endpoints included mortality and clinical evolution at Day 14 and 28, viral shedding at Day 5 and 10. ResultsThe trial was stopped after 250 patients were included due to a slowdown of the pandemic in France. The intention-to-treat population comprised 123 and 124 patients in the placebo and hydroxychloroquine groups, respectively. The median age was 77 years and 151 patients required oxygen therapy. The primary endpoint occurred in nine patients in the hydroxychloroquine group and eight patients in the placebo group (relative risk 1.12; 95% confidence interval 0.45- 2.80; P=0.82). No difference was observed between the two groups in any of the secondary endpoints. ConclusionIn this trial involving mainly older patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19, patients treated with hydroxychloroquine did not experience better clinical or virological outcomes than those receiving the placebo.

Primary study

Unclassified

Unpublished Information reported in a systematic review
Year 2020
Loading references information
This reference is based on information provided by a systematic review (Axfors C et al. Mortality outcomes with hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine in COVID-19: an international collaborative meta-analysis of randomized trials. medRxiv. 2020) reporting unpublished data provided by the authors of the trial when 247 participants had been randomized. This record has been prepared by collaborators of Epistemonikos.

Primary study

Unclassified

Authors CHU Angers
Registry of Trials EU Clinical Trials Register
Year 2020
Loading references information
INTERVENTION: Trade Name: Plaquenil® Pharmaceutical Form: Tablet Pharmaceutical form of the placebo: Tablet Route of administration of the placebo: Oral use CONDITION: Patient atteint du Covid‐19 Therapeutic area: Diseases [C] ‐ Virus Diseases [C02] PRIMARY OUTCOME: Main Objective: L’objectif principal est d’évaluer l’efficacité de l’hydroxychloroquine versus placebo sur le taux de décès ou de recours à une ventilation invasive chez les patients ayant une infection COVID‐19 à haut risque d’aggravation. Primary end point(s): Le critère de jugement principal est le décès quelle qu’en soit la cause ou le recours à une intubation et ventilation invasive dans les 14 jours (J14) suivant lâ€��inclusion et le début du traitement (J0). Secondary Objective: Les objectifs secondaires sont :; ; 1) Évaluer l’efficacité de l’hydroxychloroquine versus placebo chez les patients COVID‐19 sur : ; a‐ l’évolution clinique via l’échelle OSCI (Ordinal Scale for Clinical Improvement) pour COVID‐19 de l’OMS; b‐ la mortalité toute cause ; c‐ le portage viral ; d‐ l’incidence des accidents thrombo‐emboliques veineux ; ; 2) Évaluer l’efficacité de l’hydroxychloroquine versus placebo dans le sous‐groupe des personnes âgées de 75 ans ou plus sur :; a‐ l’évolution clinique via l’échelle OSCI pour COVID‐19 de l’OMS ; b‐ la mortalité toute cause; ; 3) Évaluer la tolérance de l’hydroxychloroquine versus placebo sur la survenue d’évènements indésirables graves; ; Objectifs ancillaires ; Évaluer, dans un sous‐groupe de patients COVID‐19, l’impact de l’hydroxychloroquine versus placebo sur l’évolution des cytokines et des marqueurs biologiques de l’immunité, de l’inflammation et de l’hémostase; Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: Le critère de jugement principal est le décès quelle qu’en soit la cause ou le recours à une intubation et ventilation invasive dans les 14 jours (J14) suivant l’inclusion et le début du traitement (J0). SECONDARY OUTCOME: Secondary end point(s): Les critères de jugement d’efficacité sont : ; ‐ Le décès quelle qu’en soit la cause ou le recours à une intubation et ventilation invasive à J28. ; ‐ 1a et 2a) L’évolution clinique sur l’échelle OSCI pour COVID‐19 de l’OMS entre J0‐J14 et entre J0‐J28. ; ‐ 1b et 2b) La mortalité toute cause à J14 et J28 ; ‐ 1c) Le taux de RT‐PCR SARS‐Cov 2 positive sur prélèvement naso‐pharyngé à J5 et J10 ; ‐ 1d) Le taux d’événements thrombo‐emboliques veineux ou artériels symptomatiques à J28, documentés et confirmés par un comité d’adjudication. ; Les critères de tolérance sont le taux d’événements indésirables graves à J28, définis selon la réglementation en vigueur. ; Les critères de jugement de l’étude ancillaire correspondent à l’’évolution des cytokines et des marqueurs biologiques de l’immunité, inflammation et hémostase entre J0, J5 et J10. ; Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point: Les critères de jugement d’efficacité sont : ; Le décès quelle qu’en soit la cause ou le recours à une intubation et ventilation invasive à J28. ; 1a et 2a) L’évolution clinique sur l’échelle OSCI pour COVID‐19 de l’OMS entre J0‐J14 et entre J0‐J28. ; 1b et 2b) La mortalité toute cause à J14 et J28 ; 1c) Le taux de RT‐PCR SARS‐Cov 2 positive sur prélèvement naso‐pharyngé à J5 et J10 ; 1d) Le taux d’événements thrombo‐emboliques veineux ou artériels symptomatiques à J28, documentés et confirmés par un comité d’adjudication. ; Les critères de tolérance sont le taux d’événements indésirables graves à J28, définis selon la réglementation en vigueur. ; INCLUSION CRITERIA: ‐ Patient majeur ‐ Infection COVID‐19 confirmée par RT‐PCR SARS‐Cov2 ou, à défaut, par scanner thoracique en faveur d’une pneumopathie virale à prédominance périphérique dans un contexte évocateur ‐ Diagnostic porté depuis moins de 48h ‐ Présence d’au moins un des deux facteurs de risque d’évolution compliquée suivant : ‐ âge = 75 ans ‐ oxygénodépendance avec saturation capillaire périphérique en oxygène (SpO2) = 94% en air ambiant ou un ratio pression partielle en oxygène (PaO2) sur fraction en oxygène dans l’air inspiré (FiO2) = 300 mmHg. ‐ Patient affilié ou bénéficiaire d’un régime de sécurité sociale ‐ Consentement écrit signé du patient ou d’un proche ou, en cas d’impossibilité, procédure d’inclusion en urgence Are the trial subjects under 18? no Number of subjects for this age range: F.1.2 Adults (18‐64 years) yes F.1.2.1 Number of subjects for this age range

Primary study

Unclassified

Authors Dubée V , Roy PM , Vielle B , Parot-Schinkel E , Blanchet O , Darsonval A , Lefeuvre C , Abbara C , Boucher S , Devaud E , Robineau O , Rispal P , Guimard T , d'Anglejean E , Diamantis S , Custaud MA , Pellier I , Mercat A , HYCOVID study group , HYCOVID investigators , Angers University Hospital , Cholet Hospital , Laval Hospital , Le Mans Hospital , Tours University Hospital , Quimper Hospital , La Roche sur Yon Hospital , Tourcoing Hospital , Orléans Hospital , Nantes University Hospital , Niort Hospital , Lorient Hospital , Brest University Hospital , Cherbourg Hospital , Saint-Brieuc Hospital , Créteil – APHP University Hospital , Saint-Antoine – APHP University Hospital , Saint-Etienne University Hospital , Toulouse University Hospital , Melun Hospital , Dijon University Hospital , Princesse Grace – Monaco Hospital , Versailles Hospital , Colmar Hospital , Agen-Nerac Hospital , Caen University Hospital , Saint-Nazaire Hospital , Nantes – Confluent Hospital , Limoges University Hospital , Poitiers University Hospital , Amiens University Hospital , Bobigny – APHP University Hospital , Cergy-Pontoise Hospital , Valencienne Hospital , Valencienne – Clinique Tessier Hospital , Henri-Mondor – APHP University Hospital , Chalon-sur-Saône Hospital , Marseille European Hospital , Auxerre Hospital , Diaconnesses Croix-Saint-Simon Hospital , Marseille – Saint Joseph Hospital , Composition of the HYCOVID management team , Steering committee , Independant data safety and monitoring board , Independent adjudication of clinical events committee , Study management Coordination , Data management
Journal Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases
Year 2021
Loading references information
OBJECTIVES: To determine whether hydroxychloroquine decreases the risk of adverse outcome in patients with mild to moderate coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) at high risk of worsening. METHODS: We conducted a multicentre randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial evaluating hydroxychloroquine in COVID-19 patients with at least one of the following risk factors for worsening: need for supplemental oxygen, age ≥75 years, age between 60 and 74 years and presence of at least one co-morbidity. Severely ill patients requiring oxygen therapy >3 L/min or intensive care were excluded. Eligible patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either 800 mg hydroxychloroquine on day 0 followed by 400 mg per day for 8 days or a placebo. The primary end point was a composite of death or start of invasive mechanical ventilation within 14 days following randomization. Secondary end points included mortality and clinical evolution at days 14 and 28, and viral shedding at days 5 and 10. RESULTS: The trial was stopped after 250 patients were included because of a slowing down of the pandemic in France. The intention-to-treat population comprised 123 and 124 patients in the placebo and hydroxychloroquine groups, respectively. The median age was 77 years (interquartile range 58-86 years) and 151/250 (60.4%) patients required oxygen therapy. The primary end point occurred in 9/124 (7.3%) patients in the hydroxychloroquine group and 8/123 (6.5%) patients in the placebo group (relative risk 1.12; 95% CI 0.45-2.80). The rates of positive SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR tests at days 5 and 10 were 72.8% (75/103) and 57.1% (52/91) in the hydroxychloroquine group, versus 73.0% (73/100) and 56.6% (47/83) in the placebo group, respectively. No difference was observed between the two groups in any of the other secondary end points. CONCLUSION: In this underpowered trial involving mainly older patients with mild to moderate COVID-19, patients treated with hydroxychloroquine did not experience better clinical or virological outcomes than those receiving the placebo. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04325893 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04325893).