La evitación de esteroides en el trasplante renal mediante la inducción de basiliximab, ciclosporina inmunosupresión y basado en biopsias de protocolo.

Categoría Estudio primario
RevistaClinical transplantation
Año 2005

Este artículo está incluido en 4 Revisiones sistemáticas Revisiones sistemáticas (4 referencias)

Este artículo es parte de los siguientes hilos de publicación
Cargando información sobre las referencias

BACKGROUND:

Reducing chronic steroid exposure is important to minimize steroid-related morbidity, particularly for susceptible renal transplant recipients. Steroid-free and steroid-sparing protocols have shown benefits, but safety has not been established for all populations. We investigated the safety of steroid avoidance (SA) in a population including African-Americans, using modern immunosuppression with protocol biopsy monitoring.

METHODS:

A randomized-controlled SA trial (early discontinuation, days 2-7) was conducted in a population (n = 77) including African-Americans and cadaveric kidney recipients. Patients received basiliximab, cyclosporine (CsA), and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). In controls, steroids were tapered to 5 mg prednisone/d by day 30. Protocol biopsies were performed (1, 6, 12 and 24 months) to evaluate subclinical acute rejection (SCAR) and chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN).

RESULTS:

The SA did not result in significantly higher incidences of graft loss, AR, SCAR, CAN, or renal fibrosis. SA patients experienced similar renal function, comparable serum lipid levels, and a trend toward fewer cases of new-onset diabetes. Clinical outcomes of African-American and non-African-American patients did not significantly differ.

CONCLUSIONS:

The SA is safe in the context of basiliximab induction and CsA-based immunosuppression. This protocol could minimize steroid-related side effects in susceptible groups, including African-Americans, without increasing the risk of AR or graft failure.
Epistemonikos ID: d2b430b4084ec7880a59c5cb00ecffdd565f2e16
First added on: Jun 08, 2011