Distinct effects of A9-Tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol on neural activation during emotional processing

Aún no traducido Aún no traducido
Categoría Estudio primario
RevistaArchives of general psychiatry
Año 2009

Este artículo está incluido en 9 Revisiones sistemáticas Revisiones sistemáticas (9 referencias) 1 Síntesis amplia Síntesis amplias (1 referencia)

Este artículo es parte de los siguientes hilos de publicación
Cargando información sobre las referencias
Context: Cannabis use can both increase and reduce anxiety in humans. The neurophysiological substrates of these effects are unknown. Objective: To investigate the effects of 2 main psychoactive constituents of Cannabis sativa (δ9-tetrahydrocan-nabinol [δ9-THC] and cannabidiol [CBD]) on regional brain function during emotional processing. Design: Subjects were studied on 3 separate occasions using an event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging paradigm while viewing faces that implicitly elicited different levels of anxiety. Each scanning session was preceded by the ingestion of either 10 mg of A9-THC, 600 mg of CBD, or a placebo in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled design. Participants: Fifteen healthy, English-native, right- handed men who had used cannabis 15 times or less in their life. Main Outcome Measures: Regional brain activation (blood oxygenation level-dependent response), electro-dermal activity (skin conductance response [SCR]), and objective and subjective ratings of anxiety.Results: δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinol increased anxiety, as well as levels of intoxication, sedation, and psychotic symptoms, whereas there was a trend for a reduction in anxiety following administration of CBD. The number of SCR fluctuations during the processing of intensely fearful faces increased following administration of A9- THC but decreased following administration of CBD. Can-nabidiol attenuated the blood oxygenation level-dependent signal in the amygdala and the anterior and posterior cingulate cortex while subjects were processing intenselyfearful faces, and its suppression ofthe amyg-dalar and anterior cingulate responses was correlated with the concurrent reduction in SCR fluctuations. δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinol mainly modulated activation in frontal and parietal areas. Conclusions: δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinol and CBD had clearly distinct effects on the neural, electrodermal, and symptomatic response to fearful faces. The effects of CBD on activation in limbic and paralimbic regions may contribute to its ability to reduce autonomic arousal and subjective anxiety, whereas the anxiogenic effects of δ9-THC may be related to effects in other brain regions. © 2009 American Medical Association.2006;30(8):1466-1471.
Epistemonikos ID: d644456fd1c6c64c6c478617c5a39aa3a2760625
First added on: Jul 29, 2016