Repita la trombólisis o tratamiento conservador frente a intervención coronaria percutánea de rescate para la trombólisis fallida: revisión sistemática y meta-análisis

Categoría Resumen estructurado de revisiones sistemáticas
RevistaDatabase of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE)
Año 2009
Cargando información sobre las referencias

CRD SUMMARY:

The authors concluded that, using indirect meta-analysis, there was a modest benefit for rescue percutaneous coronary intervention compared to repeat thrombolysis in failed thrombolysis. Evidence appeared to support the authors’ conclusions but, as with all indirect comparisons, caution is require when interpreting the results. Incomplete reporting of review methods made it difficult to comment on reliability of findings.
Epistemonikos ID: f50c2b89123d33ca03a1d97a3bf68f3d0f4c4da2
First added on: Jun 08, 2012