BACKGROUND:

Antilymphocytic antibodies have been long used for the prevention of acute rejection early after heart transplantation (HTx), but their adverse effects have limited their widespread use. Our aim was to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of the novel anti-CD25 antibody basiliximab (BAS) compared with muromonab (OKT3).

PATIENTS AND METHODS:

In this multicenter study, 99 patients were randomly assigned to receive either BAS or OKT3 in the early post-HTx period. The primary endpoint was safety and tolerability. Specific safety variables were predefined for a better comparison of adverse effects. Secondary endpoints concerning anti-rejection efficacy were also evaluated.

RESULTS:

No adverse events related to study medication were found in the BAS group, whereas 23 were observed among patients receiving OKT3 (P<0.0001). The proportion of patients with predefined adverse events day 4 post-HTx was much higher with OKT3 than with BAS (43% vs. 4%; P<0.0001). Fever, acute pulmonary edema, hypotension, and other complications accounted for most of the difference. At 1-year follow-up, biopsy-proven rejection episodes grade>or=3A had occurred in 39.6% of BAS patients versus 40.4% of OKT3 patients (P=0.87). There were no differences in terms of severity and timing of acute rejection episodes. The number of infectious episodes, complications not related to study medication, and actuarial survival were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSION:

In this HTx study, induction therapy with BAS was safer and better tolerated than OKT3, without significant differences in efficacy outcomes.

Pharmacokinetic sampling was performed in two multicenter trials in which basiliximab (anti-CD25 monoclonal antibody) was administered with triple immunosuppression consisting of cyclosporine microemulsion, corticosteroids, and either azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil. Blood samples were collected over 12 wk post-transplant from 31 azathioprine-treated and 66 mycophenolate mofetil-treated patients. Empirical Bayes estimates of each patient's basiliximab disposition parameters were derived and the duration of CD25 saturation was estimated as the time over which serum concentrations exceeded 0.2 microg/mL as confirmed by flow cytometry measurements. Basiliximab clearance was 29+/-14 mL/h when coadministered with azathioprine and 18+/-8 mL/h with mycophenolate mofetil. Both were significantly lower compared with a clearance of 37+/-15 mL/h from a previous study of basiliximab with dual therapy (p<0.001). As a consequence of the lower clearance of basiliximab, the durations of CD25 saturation were prolonged in the presence of azathioprine (50+/-20 d; range, 13--84) and mycophenolate mofetil (59+/-17 d; range, 28--94) compared with dual therapy (36+/-14 d; range, 12--91). A total of 27 acute rejection episodes occurred during the first 6 months in the two studies. Durations of CD25 saturation were not different in these patients compared with those who remained rejection-free in each study. A single patient among 57 who were screened developed anti-idiotype antibodies to basiliximab. The average duration of CD25 saturation was prolonged by 39 and 64% in the presence of azathioprine and mycophenolate mofetil, respectively. This graded effect was also observed for basiliximab clearance and may be due in part to a differentially reduced humoral response to basiliximab. Nonetheless, the range of CD25 saturation durations and basiliximab clearances did not extend outside the range when basiliximab was used with dual therapy in the absence of these agents. Hence, no dosing adjustment is deemed necessary when basiliximab is used in triple immunosuppressive therapy including either azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil.

BACKGROUND.: The aim of this substudy within a prospective, multicenter, placebo-controlled trial was to assess the pharmacokinetics and immunodynamics of basiliximab in pediatric renal transplant recipients on comedication with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). METHODS.: Eighty-two patients aged 3 to 18 years, receiving cyclosporine microemulsion, MMF, corticosteroids, and basiliximab or placebo were investigated. Basiliximab serum concentrations were determined by ELISA, CD25, and CD122 T lymphocytes by flow cytometry. RESULTS.: Basiliximab clearance adjusted to body surface area was significantly (P<0.05) greater in children versus adults, but the relatively higher basiliximab dose given to children yielded similar exposure compared with adolescents. A cross-study comparison revealed that MMF reduced basiliximab clearance and prolonged CD25 saturation duration from approximately 5 weeks in the absence of MMF to 10 weeks in the presence of MMF. Basiliximab led to a marked reduction of CD25 T-cell fraction during the first 8 to 10 weeks posttransplant, but did not specifically affect CD122 T cells. The majority of biopsy-proven acute rejection episodes (BPAR) were observed after interleukin (IL) 2-R desaturation, whereas about a quarter of BPARs occurred despite adequate IL2-R blockade. CONCLUSIONS.: The currently recommended basiliximab dose for pediatric patients, when used with cyclosporine microemulsion and corticosteroids, yielded adequate drug exposure in children and adolescents also under MMF comedication. The observation that about a quarter of BPARs occurred despite adequate IL2-R blockade suggests that another T-cell activation pathway independent of the IL-2/IL-2R pathway is operative, for example, the IL-15 signaling pathway. © 2008 by Lippincott Williams and Wilkins.

It has been shown that an induction therapy with the monoclonal anti-interleukin-2 receptor antibody basiliximab (Simulect) is capable to reduce the incidence of acute graft rejection in adult and pediatric liver transplantation (Ltx). However, data on long-term results using basiliximab in children post-Ltx are still pending. Therefore, the objective of our study was to report on the long-term results of basiliximab induction therapy in pediatric liver transplant recipients. A total of 54 children received two single doses of basiliximab in addition to cyclosporine and prednisolone following Ltx. We analyzed the incidence of acute and chronic graft rejection that of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD), and patient and graft survival. The follow-up was 22-46 months. The historical control group (matched controls) consisted of 54 patients treated with a cyclosporine and prednisolone dual therapy. Patient survival was 53 of 54 in the treatment group and 51 of 54 in the controls. One patient was retransplanted in the treatment group vs. three patients in the control group. The incidence of acute graft rejection was 16.6% compared with 53.7% in the control group (p < 0.001), that of chronic rejection was comparable in both groups (one of 54 vs. one of 54). The incidence of steroid resistant rejection was four of 54 vs. six of 54 that of PTLD were one of 54 vs. zero of 54. There were no adverse effects observed, which could be related to the antibody treatment. We conclude that basiliximab provides safe and effective induction immunosuppression in pediatric liver graft recipients. Short- and even long-term results are excellent.

Este artículo no tiene resumen

BACKGROUND:

A double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study was performed to assess whether immunoprophylaxis with basiliximab (Simulect) could reduce the incidence of acute rejection in kidney transplant recipients treated with cyclosporine (Neoral), steroids, and azathioprine.

METHODS:

Three hundred forty patients received either placebo or basiliximab at a dose of 20 mg, given intravenously on days 0 and 4. All patients received cyclosporine, steroids, and azathioprine. The primary endpoint was the incidence of acute rejection at 6 months. Secondary endpoints included the safety and tolerability of basiliximab and placebo, 1-year patient and graft survival, and significant medical events up to 12 months.

RESULTS:

During the first 6 months posttransplantation, acute rejection occurred in 20.8% of patients given basiliximab versus 34.9% of patients administered placebo (P=0.005). Similarly, there was a reduction in biopsy-proven acute rejection at 6 months in the patients receiving basiliximab (P=0.023). One-year patient survival was 97.6% with basiliximab and 97.1% with placebo, graft survival was 91.5% versus 88.4%, respectively (NS). The adverse-events profile of patients treated with basiliximab was indistinguishable from that of patients treated with placebo. The number of patients with infections was similar (65.5% for basiliximab vs. 65.7% for placebo), including cytomegalovirus infections (17.3% vs. 14.5%, P=0.245). Nine neoplasms (three in the basiliximab group, six in the placebo arm) were recorded up to 1 year from transplantation.

CONCLUSIONS:

Basiliximab in combination with cyclosporine, steroids, and azathioprine triple therapy was highly effective in reducing the incidence of acute renal allograft rejection without increasing the incidence of infections and other side effects.

In a 6-month, multicenter, randomized, controlled, open-label, parallel-group trial, we investigated the efficacy and safety of adding basiliximab to a standard tacrolimus-based regimen in pediatric renal transplant recipients. Patients < 18 years received tacrolimus/azathioprine/steroids (TAS, n = 93) or tacrolimus/azathioprine/steroids/basiliximab (TAS + B, n = 99). Target tacrolimus levels were 10-20 ng/mL between days 0-21 and 5-15 ng/mL thereafter. Steroid dosing was identical in both groups. Basiliximab was administered at 10 mg (patients < 40 kg) or 20 mg (patients > or = 40 kg) within 4 h of reperfusion; the same dose was repeated on day 4. Biopsy-proven acute rejection rates were 20.4% (TAS) and 19.2% (TAS + B); steroid-resistant acute rejection rates were 3.2% and 3.0%, respectively. Patient survival was 100%; graft survival rates were 95% in both arms. The nature and incidence of adverse events were similar in both arms except toxic nephropathy and abdominal pain, which were significantly higher in the TAS + B arm (14.1% vs. 4.3%; p = 0.03 and 11.1% vs. 2.2%; p = 0.02; respectively). Median serum creatinine concentrations at 6 months were 86 micromol/L in the TAS and 91 micromol/L in the TAS + B arm; glomerular filtration rate was 79.4 and 77.6 (mL/min/1.73 m2), respectively. Adding basiliximab to a tacrolimus-based regimen is safe in pediatric patients, but does not improve clinical efficacy.

BACKGROUND:

Addition of the interleukin-2 receptor (IL-2R) antagonists basiliximab or daclizumab to a calcineurin inhibitor-based regimen significantly reduces risk of acute rejection with a tolerability profile similar to a placebo. Use of a truncated two-dose regimen of daclizumab has been reported, but till date, there has been no controlled study of two-dose daclizumab vs. two-dose basiliximab.

METHODS:

Deceased-donor renal transplant recipients were randomized to basiliximab (20 mg on days 0 and 4) or daclizumab (50 mg on days 1 and 14) with cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil and corticosteroids. Flow cytometry was used to calculate the proportion of CD25(+) T cells in peripheral blood.

RESULTS:

Thirty patients were randomized to basiliximab and 28 to daclizumab. There was one patient death in each group, with no other graft losses. By six months, the incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection was 0% with basiliximab vs. 21.4% with daclizumab (p < 0.05). Three patients in the daclizumab group required OKT3 for steroid-resistant rejection. There were no between-group differences in the incidence of infection. The proportion of CD25(+) T cells declined markedly during the first two wk in both groups, but was significantly lower in the basiliximab group during weeks six to eight.

CONCLUSION:

Two doses of basiliximab are more effective than two 1 mg/kg doses of daclizumab in preventing acute rejection in de novo renal transplant patients receiving cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil and corticosteroid maintenance therapy. In patients receiving relatively low-level immunosuppression in order to minimize toxicity, basiliximab may be preferable to a truncated daclizumab regimen.

In this prospective, randomized, open-label, single-center study, we compared the efficacy and safety of two anti-interleukin-2 receptor monoclonal antibodies among adult recipients of at least 1 HLA-mismatched deceased donor renal grafts. Eligible patients were randomized to induction with either basiliximab or daclizumab. Both groups received cyclosporine microemulsion (CsA Neoral), mycophenolate mofetil, and methylprednisolone. An intent-to-treat analysis of 1-year data assessed the incidence of acute rejection episodes, the renal graft function, the safety, and the patient and graft survivals. Among 127 patients, six (10.0%) and seven (11.5%) patients experienced biopsy-confirmed acute rejection at 12 months, in the basiliximab and the daclizumab groups, respectively. Two renal grafts were lost in the basiliximab and six in the daclizumab cohort, one of them due to rejection. One basiliximab and two daclizumab patients died. Hospital treatment was required for 25 and 33 infections in basiliximab and daclizumab groups, respectively. One basal cell carcinoma of skin was detected. One hypersensitivity reaction was observed with daclizumab. At 12 months, serum creatinine was 101+/-28 micromol/L with basiliximab and 109+/-41 micromol/L with daclizumab. Patient survival was 98.4% with basiliximab and 96.7% with daclizumab, and graft survival was 96.8% versus 90.8%, respectively. No significant differences were observed between the groups. Basiliximab or daclizumab combined with triple therapy was an efficient and safe immunosuppression strategy, demonstrated with low incidence of acute rejection episodes, an acceptable adverse event profile, excellent graft function, and high survival rates in adult recipients within the first year after deceased donor renal transplantation.

BACKGROUND:

Immunosuppressive therapy with cyclosporin A has substantially improved clinical outcomes for renal transplantation. Whether basiliximab (a chimeric monoclonal antibody) demonstrates economic and quality-of-life advantages over other induction therapies has not yet been shown.

METHODS:

A multi-centre open-label clinical trial was conducted among renal transplant recipients in the US, in which patients were randomized into two induction therapy regimens: basiliximab and antithymocyte globulin (ATG) as part of a quadruple immunosuppressive regimen. Medical resources used and a EuroQol visual analogue scale (VAS) rating of quality of life were collected prospectively for the 135 dosed subjects for a period of 1 year post-treatment. We analysed the differences between treatment groups in 1-year costs and 1-year quality-adjusted survival. We also conducted a post hoc analysis of outcomes among the subgroup of patients identified as high risk.

RESULTS:

A significant difference was observed in first-year post-treatment costs (basiliximab, $45857; ATG, $54729; difference, $8872 (95% CI, $1169 to $16573). The savings from basiliximab can be attributed to the less expensive induction therapy (basiliximab, $2378; ATG, $8670; difference, $6292 (95% CI, $5165 to $7419)) and other savings during the initial hospitalization totalling $2609. One-year quality-adjusted survival was the same in both groups (basiliximab, 81.5; ATG, 81.1; difference, 0.45 (95% CI, -5.9 to 6.8)). The results of the post hoc analysis of the 48 high-risk patients were comparable to the analysis of all patients.

CONCLUSIONS:

These results demonstrate lower first-year post-treatment costs in renal-transplant recipients receiving basiliximab compared to ATG with no differences in quality-adjusted survival. The results also suggest similar differences among high-risk subjects.