Bipolar disorder is a common and often chronic and debilitating mental illness. The depressive phase of bipolar disorder contributes the largest portion of the disorder, and treatment resistant bipolar depression represents a significant public health problem. Recent research has suggested that bipolar depression is associated with elevated brain glutamate activity. We hypothesize that riluzole, a drug approved for ALS which inhibits glutamate activity, will lead to clinical improvement in patients with bipolar depression.

Cognitive aging is a major source of disability in an increasingly aging population. The paucity of effective treatments for cognitive aging disorders, and most importantly in Alzheimer\'s disease instigates a need for further research into novel therapeutic possibilities. Alzheimer\'s disease is the most common neurodegenerative disorder and its prevalence steeply increases. Glutamate-mediated excitotoxicity in neuropsychiatric disorders and in particular in Alzheimer\'s disease has been shown to cause significant cerebral damage. Early effective therapeutic intervention in Alzheimer\'s disease is critical in order to prevent or at least slow down neuropathological progression that will lead to widespread irreversible neuronal loss and significant cognitive dysfunction. Riluzole, a glutamate modulator agent, will be tested in mild Alzheimer\'s disease patients. Cognitive functional changes along with two established in vivo biomarkers, namely, Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS) and Fluorodeoxyglucose (18F) positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) will be evaluated.

Este artículo no tiene resumen

In preclinical studies, medications which decrease glutamate release have been shown to block some of the effects of psychostimulants. One such medication is riluzole, marketed for the treatment of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS). The goal of this study was to determine riluzole's effects on acute physiological and subjective responses to d-amphetamine in healthy volunteers. Seven male and 5 female subjects participated in an outpatient double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study. Across 4 sessions, subjects were randomly assigned to a sequence of 4 oral treatments: placebo, 20 mg D-amphetamine alone, 100 mg riluzole alone, or d-amphetamine plus riluzole. Outcome measures included heart rate, blood pressure, plasma cortisol, performance on the Sustained Attention to Response Test (SART), and subjective measures. d-amphetamine increased heart rate, blood pressure and plasma cortisol levels while inducing psychostimulant-type subjective effects. On the SART, d-amphetamine enhanced the speed of correct responses but also significantly increased the number of errors of commission. Riluzole at 100 mg did not block, the typical subjective and physiological responses to 20 mg D-amphetamine. Riluzole alone induced amphetamine-like subjective responses. On the SART test, riluzole increased the number errors of commission, but unlike d-amphetamine, did not speed reaction time. The mechanism accounting for these findings is unclear, but may involve processes other than decreased glutamate release by riluzole. The effects of glutamate medications on psychostimulant responses need to be further examined.

At present there are over 1 million people living with Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) in North America alone, with annual costs for the acute treatment and chronic care of these patients totaling four billion dollars USD. The worldwide prevalence of SCI is unknown, with estimates ranging up to 250 million individuals. The incidence of SCI in developed countries has been estimated to be between 10 ‐ 40 cases per million inhabitants. In spite of the immense impact of SCI at a personal and societal level, an effective and safe pharmacologic treatment for SCI, shown to improve neurological and functional outcomes at long‐term follow‐up, remains absent. At present, there is no specific pharmacological therapy that is given uniformly to all patients with traumatic SCI. As a result, a placebo‐controlled comparison group is ethical and justifiable. The aim of the current trial is to evaluate efficacy and safety of riluzole in the treatment of patients with acute SCI. The primary objective of the current Phase II/III trial is to evaluate the superiority of riluzole, at a dose of 2 x 100 mg the first 24 hours followed by 2 x 50 mg for the following 13 days after injury, as compared to placebo, in change between 180 days and baseline in motor outcomes as measured by International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury Examination (ISNCSCI) Motor Score, in patients with acute traumatic SCI, presenting to the hospital less than 12 hours after injury. Secondary objectives are to evaluate the effects of riluzole on overall neurologic recovery, sensory recovery, functional outcomes, quality of life outcomes, health utilities, mortality, and adverse events. The working hypothesis is that the riluzole treated subjects will experience superior motor, sensory, functional, and quality of life outcomes as compared to those receiving placebo, with an acceptable safety profile. The final degree of neurological tissue destruction that occurs after traumatic SCI is a product of both primary and secondary injury mechanisms. The primary mechanical injury to the cord initiates a subsequent signaling cascade of deleterious down‐stream events, known collectively as secondary injury mechanisms. These secondary injury mechanisms include ischemia, interstitial and cellular ionic imbalance, free radical formation, glutamatergic excitotoxicity, lipid peroxidation and generation of arachidonic acid metabolites. Although little can be done from a therapeutic standpoint to correct damage sustained during the primary injury, by mitigating the evolution of secondary injury events there is opportunity to preserve remnant viable neurological tissue and improve neurologic outcomes. There is convincing evidence from the preclinical realm that the pharmacologic agent riluzole attenuates certain aspects of the secondary injury cascade leading to diminished neurological tissue destruction in animal SCI models. Riluzole, a sodium channel blocking benzothiazole anticonvulsant, specifically exerts its neuroprotective effect by helping to maintain neuronal cellular ionic balance and by reducing the release of excitotoxic glutamate in the post‐SCI setting. Several preclinical studies in the rodent SCI model have associated administration of riluzole with increased neural tissue preservation at the site of injury, in addition to improved behavioral outcomes, in comparison to administration of placebo or other sodium channel blocking drugs. In the clinical realm, while riluzole has not been studied extensively in the context of SCI, it has been widely used in the treatment of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). A 2007 Cochrane review, summarizing the findings of 4 placebo‐controlled randomized trials, concluded that at a dose of 100 mg daily, riluzole is safe and improves median survival by 2‐3 months in patients with ALS. In regards to adverse events (AEs), riluzole was well tolerated, although treated patients were 2.6 times more likely to experience a three‐fold increase in serum alanine transaminase (ALT) as compared to patients treated with placebo. However, this effect was found to be uniformly reversible with cessation of riluzole therapy and was only reported after several months of medication administration. Recently, the clinical safety and pharmacokinetic profile of riluzole have been studied in a multi‐center pilot study in the context of traumatic SCI. A total of 36 patients received an oral dose of riluzole 50 mg twice daily for 2 weeks, with treatment initiated within 12 hours of injury for all patients. The 12 hour dosing window, as well as the 2 week duration of therapy, was chosen to match the period of medication administration to the known period of glutamatergic excitotoxicity after SCI (several minutes after injury until 2 weeks after injury). With the final analysis currently undergoing peer review, completion of this study has confirmed the acceptable safety profile of riluzole administration previously documented in the ALS literature, and has established the feasibility of conducting a large‐scale efficacy trial investigating this therapy.

The objective of the study is to compare the pharmacokinetic profile of riluzole after replicate single dose of the novel orodispersible film test formulation and of the marketed reference Rilutek® tablets and to evaluate their bioequivalence.

The subjects will receive single oral doses of 50 mg of riluzole, as test orodispersible film and reference film-coated tablets under fasting conditions, in each of 4 subsequent periods separated by wash-out intervals of at least 7 days between consecutive administrations, according to a 2-treatment, 4-period, replicate cross-over design.

Recent controlled trials in outpatients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) indicate that riluzole prolongs tracheostomy-free survival. After 12 months' treatment, riluzole 50 mg, 100 mg and 200 mg daily reduced the risk of death or tracheostomy (relative to placebo) by 24%, 34% and 31%, respectively (by 28%, 43% and 43%, respectively, after adjustment for known prognostic factors). This survival advantage (6-9 patients require treatment with riluzole to avoid 1 death/tracheostomy annually) compares favourably with that achieved therapeutically in breast cancer and coronary artery disease. Some 6000 ALS patients are currently receiving riluzole 50 mg twice daily within the Riluzole Early Access Program. In France, this programme is being implemented as an open-label multicentre trial to assess patients' functional status and quality of life. To date, 844 patients have been enrolled, and they will be followed up for 12 months on riluzole. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics of this study population are presented here.

We conducted a 6-week open-label trial of riluzole (50 mg twice a day) in eight subjects with Huntington's disease. Subjects were evaluated before riluzole treatment, on treatment, and off treatment with the chorea, dystonia, and total functional capacity (TFC) scores from the Unified Huntington's Disease Rating Scale and magnetic resonance spectroscopy measurements of occipital cortex and basal ganglia lactate levels. Adverse events and safety blood and urine tests were assessed throughout the study. All subjects completed the study and riluzole was well tolerated. The age was 45+/-10.2 years (mean +/- standard deviation) and the disease duration was 6.1+/-4.1 years. The chorea rating score improved by 35% on treatment (p = 0.013) and worsened after discontinuation of treatment (p = 0.026). There were no significant treatment effects on the dystonia or TFC scores. The baseline occipital and basal ganglia lactate levels were elevated in all subjects; there was a trend toward lower lactate/creatine ratios during riluzole treatment in the basal ganglia spectra but not in occipital cortex spectra. Additional clinical studies of riluzole for both symptomatic and neuroprotective benefit in Huntington's disease are warranted.

Evaluate the efficacy of riluzole 50-mg bid defined by comparing the percentage of riluzole-treated subjects who experienced death, permanently assisted ventilation (PAV) or tracheostomy, to a group of recent historical controls for the treatment of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS).

This study examines if Riluzole, FDA approved for ALS, will improve symptoms of depression in Bipolar Disorder.

Purpose: This study will examine the safety and effectiveness of riluzole (Rilutek trademark) for short-term treatment of depression symptoms, such as depressed mood, psychomotor retardation, and excessive sleeping in patients with bipolar disease. Riluzole is approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to treat amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS, also known as Lou Gehrig\'s disease). Preliminary findings of a study using riluzole to treat acute depression in patients with unipolar depression indicate that it may have antidepressant properties in some patients.

Patients between 18 and 70 years of age with bipolar I or II disorder without psychosis may be eligible for this 8-week study. Candidates must be currently depressed, must have had at least one previous major depressive episode, and must have failed to improve with prior treatment with at least one antidepressant. They will be screened with a medical history, physical examination, electrocardiogram (EKG), blood and urine tests, and psychiatric evaluation. A blood or urine sample will be analyzed for illegal drugs. Women of childbearing potential will have a pregnancy test.

Participants will begin an 8-week course of treatment, starting with a placebo (a sugar pill formulated to look like the active drug) and, at some point, switching to riluzole. In addition to drug treatment, participants will undergo the following procedures:

Physical examination and electrocardiogram (EKG) at the beginning and end of the study;

Weekly check of vital signs (temperature, blood pressure and heart rate);

Weekly 1-hour interviews consisting of psychiatric and psychomotor rating scales to assess treatment response;

Weekly blood tests to measure blood levels of riluzole and evaluate drug side effects.

At the end of the study, participants\' psychiatric status will be reassessed and appropriate long-term psychiatric treatment arranged.

Atendemos pacientes de habla hispana.

We enroll eligible participants locally and from around the country. Travel arrangements are provided and costs covered by the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH). (Arrangements vary by distance and by specific study.) After completing the study participants receive short-term follow-up care while transitioning back to a provider.