BACKGROUND: Concerns about stavudine (d4T) toxicity have led to increased use of abacavir (ABC) in first-line pediatric antiretroviral treatment (ART) regimens. Field experience with ABC in ART-naïve children is limited.
METHODS: Deidentified demographic, clinical and laboratory data on HIV-infected children initiating ART between 2004 and 2011 in a large pediatric HIV treatment program in Johannesburg, South Africa, were used to compare viral suppression at 6 and 12 months by initial treatment regimen, time to suppression (<400 copies/mL) and rebound (>1000 copies/mL after initial suppression). Adjusted logistic regression was used to investigate confounders and calendar effects.
RESULTS: Two thousand thirty-six children initiated either d4T/3TC- or ABC/3TC-based first-line regimens in combination with either boosted lopinavir (LPV/r) or efavirenz (EFV). 1634 received d4T regimens (LPV/r n = 672; EFV n = 962) and 402 ABC regimens (LPV/r n = 192; EFV n = 210). At 6 and 12 months on ART, viral suppression rate was poorer in ABC versus d4T groups within both the LPV/r and EFV groups (P < 0.0001 for all points). In ABC groups, time to suppression was significantly slower (log-rank P < 0.0001 and P = 0.0092 for LPV/r- and EFV-based, respectively) and time to rebound after suppression significantly faster (log-rank P = 0.014 and P = 0.0001 for LPV/r- and EFV-based, respectively). Logistic regression confirmed the worse outcomes in the ABC groups even after adjustment for confounders.
CONCLUSION: Data from this urban pediatric ART service program show significantly poorer virological performance of ABC compared with d4T-based regimens, a signal that urgently warrants further investigation.
BACKGROUND: Initiation criteria and pediatric antiretroviral treatment regimens have changed over the past few years in South Africa. We reported worse early virological outcomes associated with the use of abacavir (ABC)-based regimens at 1 large site: here, we expand this analysis to multiple sites in the IeDEA-Southern Africa collaboration.
METHODS: Data for 9543 antiretroviral treatment-naïve children <16 years at treatment initiation started on either stavudine/lamivudine (d4T/3TC) or ABC/3TC with efavirenz (EFV) or ritonavir-boosted lopinavir (LPV/r) treated at 6 clinics in Johannesburg and Cape Town, South Africa, were analyzed with χ tests and logistic regression to evaluate viral suppression at 6 and 12 months.
RESULTS: Prevalence of viral suppression at 6 months in 2174 children started on a d4T-based LPV/r regimen was greater (70%) than among 438 children started on an ABC-based LPV/r regimen (54%, P < 0.0001). Among 3189 children started on a d4T-based EFV regimen, a higher proportion (86%) achieved suppression at 6 months compared with 391 children started on ABC-containing EFV regimens (78%, P < 0.0001). Relative benefit of d4T versus ABC on 6-month suppression remained in multivariate analysis after adjustment for pretreatment characteristics, cohort and year of program [LPV/r: odds ratio = 0.57 (confidence interval: 0.46-0.72); EFV: odds ratio = 0.46 (confidence interval: 0.32-0.65)].
CONCLUSIONS: This expanded analysis is consistent with our previous report of worse virological outcomes after ABC was introduced as part of first-line antiretroviral treatment in South Africa. Whether due to the drug itself or coincident with other changes over time, continued monitoring and analyses must clarify causes and prevent suboptimal long-term outcomes.
Concerns about stavudine (d4T) toxicity have led to increased use of abacavir (ABC) in first-line pediatric antiretroviral treatment (ART) regimens. Field experience with ABC in ART-naïve children is limited.
METHODS:
Deidentified demographic, clinical and laboratory data on HIV-infected children initiating ART between 2004 and 2011 in a large pediatric HIV treatment program in Johannesburg, South Africa, were used to compare viral suppression at 6 and 12 months by initial treatment regimen, time to suppression (<400 copies/mL) and rebound (>1000 copies/mL after initial suppression). Adjusted logistic regression was used to investigate confounders and calendar effects.
RESULTS:
Two thousand thirty-six children initiated either d4T/3TC- or ABC/3TC-based first-line regimens in combination with either boosted lopinavir (LPV/r) or efavirenz (EFV). 1634 received d4T regimens (LPV/r n = 672; EFV n = 962) and 402 ABC regimens (LPV/r n = 192; EFV n = 210). At 6 and 12 months on ART, viral suppression rate was poorer in ABC versus d4T groups within both the LPV/r and EFV groups (P < 0.0001 for all points). In ABC groups, time to suppression was significantly slower (log-rank P < 0.0001 and P = 0.0092 for LPV/r- and EFV-based, respectively) and time to rebound after suppression significantly faster (log-rank P = 0.014 and P = 0.0001 for LPV/r- and EFV-based, respectively). Logistic regression confirmed the worse outcomes in the ABC groups even after adjustment for confounders.
CONCLUSION:
Data from this urban pediatric ART service program show significantly poorer virological performance of ABC compared with d4T-based regimens, a signal that urgently warrants further investigation.
