This study is designed to provide safety and efficacy data to support the development of CP-690,550 in patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis on background of methotrexate.
Conferencia»75th Annual Scientific Meeting of the American College of Rheumatology/46th Annual Scientific Meeting of the Association of Rheumatology Health Professionals, Chicago, IL, United States (Published in: Arhtritis & Rheumatism 2011;63(Supp 10):1017)
OBJETIVO: El objetivo de este 24 meses estudio de fase III fue examinar la conservación estructural con tofacitinib en pacientes con artritis reumatoide (AR) con una respuesta inadecuada a metotrexato (MTX). Se reportan los datos de un análisis provisional de 12 meses previsto.
MÉTODOS: En este grupos paralelos, doble ciego, controlado con placebo, los pacientes que recibieron MTX fondo se asignaron al azar 4: 4: 1: 1 a tofacitinib a 5 mg dos veces al día, tofacitinib a 10 mg dos veces al día, con placebo a tofacitinib a las 5 mg dos veces al día, y placebo al tofacitinib a 10 mg dos veces al día. En el mes 3, los pacientes tratados con placebo no respondedores fueron avanzadas en una forma ciega para recibir tofacitinib como se indica más arriba; los pacientes tratados con placebo restantes se adelantaron a los 6 meses. Cuatro puntos finales principales de eficacia fueron analizados en un procedimiento de bajada.
RESULTADOS: En el mes 6, las tasas de respuesta de acuerdo con el American College of Rheumatology 20% los requisitos de mejoramiento para tofacitinib a 5 mg y 10 mg dos veces al día fueron superiores a los de placebo (51,5% y 61,8%, respectivamente, frente a 25,3%; P ambos <0,0001). En el mes 6, media de mínimos cuadrados (LSM) cambios en total modificados de Sharp / van der Heijde puntuación para tofacitinib a 5 mg y 10 mg dos veces al día fueron 0,12 y 0,06, respectivamente, frente a 0,47 para el placebo (P = 0,0792 y P ≤ 0,05, respectivamente). En el mes 3, los cambios de LSM en la puntuación del índice de discapacidad Cuestionario de Evaluación de Salud para tofacitinib a 5 mg y 10 mg dos veces al día fueron -0.40 (significado no declarado debido procedimiento para el paso hacia abajo) y -0,54 (p <0,0001), respectivamente, frente a -0,15 para el placebo. En el mes 6, las tasas de remisión (definida como un valor <2,6 para el de 4 variables Disease Activity Score en 28 articulaciones utilizando la velocidad de sedimentación globular) para tofacitinib a 5 mg y 10 mg dos veces al día fueron 7.2% (significado no declarado debido a procedimiento paso hacia abajo) y 16,0% (p <0,0001), respectivamente, frente a 1,6% para placebo. El perfil de seguridad fue consistente con los hallazgos de estudios anteriores.
CONCLUSIÓN: Los datos de este análisis intermedio 12-meses demuestran que tofacitinib inhibe la progresión del daño estructural y mejora la actividad de la enfermedad en pacientes con AR que reciben MTX.
Introduction: Small increases in mean serum creatinine (SCr) were observed in studies of rheumatoid arthritis patients during tofacitinib treatment. These SCr changes were investigated and potential mechanisms explored.Methods: SCr values and renal adverse event data were pooled from five Phase 3 and two long-term extension (LTE) studies. Dose-response relationships and association with inflammation (C-reactive protein (CRP)) were explored using Phase 2 data and confirmed with Phase 3 data.Results: In Phase 3, least squares mean SCr differences from placebo at Month 3 were 0.02 and 0.04 mg/dl for tofacitinib 5 and 10 mg twice daily (BID) (P <0.05), respectively. During Months 0 to 3, confirmed SCr ≥33% increases over baseline were reported in 17 (1.4%; 5 mg BID) and 23 (1.9%; 10 mg BID) patients. Generally, elevations plateaued and remained within normal limits throughout Phase 3 and LTE studies. Exposure-response modeling demonstrated small, reversible effects of tofacitinib on mean SCr, and significant (P <0.05) effects of CRP on model parameters. Phase 3 data confirmed that patients with higher baseline CRP or greater CRP decreases following tofacitinib treatment had the largest increases in SCr. Across Phase 3 and LTE studies, 22 tofacitinib-treated patients had clinical acute renal failure (ARF), predominantly in the setting of concurrent serious illness.Conclusions: Tofacitinib treatment was associated with small, reversible mean increases in SCr that plateaued early. The mechanism behind these SCr changes remains unknown, but may involve effects of tofacitinib on inflammation. ARF occurred infrequently, was associated with concurrent serious illness, and was unrelated to prior SCr increases.
OBJETIVO: Determinar la tasa de infección y mortalidad por cualquier causa a través de tofacitinib fase II, fase III, y la extensión a largo plazo (LTE) estudios en pacientes con moderada a severamente activa de la artritis reumatoide (AR).
Se analizaron los datos combinados de los estudios de tofacitinib en pacientes con AR: MÉTODOS. En estos estudios, tofacitinib fue administrado como monoterapia o en combinación con metotrexato u otros fármacos antirreumáticos modificadores de la enfermedad no biológicos. La fecha límite para la inclusión de los datos fue 19 de abril 2012.
RESULTADOS: Al otro lado de la fase II, fase III, y los estudios de LTE, 4.789 pacientes recibieron tofacitinib (8.460 pacientes-años de exposición). La tasa global de infección seria era 3,09 eventos por 100 pacientes-año (95% intervalo de confianza [IC 95%] 2,73-3,49), y las tasas se mantuvieron estables en el tiempo. Un modelo de riesgos proporcionales de Cox mostró que la edad, la dosis de corticosteroides, la diabetes, y la dosis tofacitinib estaban relacionados de forma independiente con el riesgo de infección grave. Recuento de linfocitos de <0,5 × 10 (3) / mm (3) fueron rara pero se asocia con un mayor riesgo de infección tratada y / o grave. En general, todas las causas de mortalidad fueron las tasas de 0,30 eventos por 100 pacientes-año (IC del 95%: 0,20 hasta 0,44).
CONCLUSIÓN: El riesgo general de infección (incluyendo infección grave) y mortalidad en los pacientes con AR tratados con tofacitinib parecen ser similares a los observados en los pacientes con AR tratados con agentes biológicos. Las tasas de infección grave se mantuvieron estables en el tiempo.
OBJECTIVES: Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). To further assess the potential role of Janus kinase inhibition in the development of malignancies, we performed an integrated analysis of data from the tofacitinib RA clinical development programme.
METHODS: Malignancy data (up to 10 April 2013) were pooled from six phase II, six Phase III and two long-term extension (LTE) studies involving tofacitinib. In the phase II and III studies, patients with moderate-to-severe RA were randomised to various tofacitinib doses as monotherapy or with background non-biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), mainly methotrexate. The LTE studies (tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg twice daily) enrolled patients from qualifying prior phase I, II and III index studies.
RESULTS: Of 5671 tofacitinib-treated patients, 107 developed malignancies (excluding non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC)). The most common malignancy was lung cancer (n=24) followed by breast cancer (n=19), lymphoma (n=10) and gastric cancer (n=6). The rate of malignancies by 6-month intervals of tofacitinib exposure indicates rates remained stable over time. Standardised incidence ratios (comparison with Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results) for all malignancies (excluding NMSC) and selected malignancies (lung, breast, lymphoma, NMSC) were within the expected range of patients with moderate-to-severe RA.
CONCLUSIONS: The overall rates and types of malignancies observed in the tofacitinib clinical programme remained stable over time with increasing tofacitinib exposure.
OBJECTIVES: Biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) have shown diminished clinical response following an inadequate response (IR) to ≥1 previous bDMARD. Here, tofacitinib was compared with placebo in patients with an IR to conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs; bDMARD-naive) and in patients with an IR to bDMARDs (bDMARD-IR).
METHODS: Data were taken from phase II and phase III studies of tofacitinib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Patients received tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg twice daily, or placebo, as monotherapy or with background methotrexate or other csDMARDs. Efficacy endpoints and incidence rates of adverse events (AEs) of special interest were assessed.
RESULTS: 2812 bDMARD-naive and 705 bDMARD-IR patients were analysed. Baseline demographics and disease characteristics were generally similar between treatment groups within subpopulations. Across subpopulations, improvements in efficacy parameters at month 3 were generally significantly greater for both tofacitinib doses versus placebo. Clinical response was numerically greater with bDMARD-naive versus bDMARD-IR patients (overlapping 95% CIs). Rates of safety events of special interest were generally similar between tofacitinib doses and subpopulations; however, patients receiving glucocorticoids had more serious AEs, discontinuations due to AEs, serious infection events and herpes zoster. Numerically greater clinical responses and incidence rates of AEs of special interest were generally reported for tofacitinib 10 mg twice daily versus tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily (overlapping 95% CIs).
CONCLUSIONS: Tofacitinib demonstrated efficacy in both bDMARD-naive and bDMARD-IR patients with RA. Clinical response to tofacitinib was generally numerically greater in bDMARD-naive than bDMARD-IR patients. The safety profile appeared similar between subpopulations.
TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: (NCT00413660, NCT00550446, NCT00603512, NCT00687193, NCT00960440, NCT00847613, NCT00814307, NCT00856544, NCT00853385).
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the risk of opportunistic infections (OIs) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated with tofacitinib.
METHODS: Phase II, III and long-term extension clinical trial data (April 2013 data-cut) from the tofacitinib RA programme were reviewed. OIs defined a priori included mycobacterial and fungal infections, multidermatomal herpes zoster and other viral infections associated with immunosuppression. For OIs, we calculated crude incidence rates (IRs; per 100 patient-years (95% CI)); for tuberculosis (TB) specifically, we calculated rates stratified by patient enrolment region according to background TB IR (per 100 patient-years): low (≤0.01), medium (>0.01 to ≤0.05) and high (>0.05).
RESULTS: We identified 60 OIs among 5671 subjects; all occurred among tofacitinib-treated patients. TB (crude IR 0.21, 95% CI of (0.14 to 0.30)) was the most common OI (n=26); median time between drug start and diagnosis was 64 weeks (range 15-161 weeks). Twenty-one cases (81%) occurred in countries with high background TB IR, and the rate varied with regional background TB IR: low 0.02 (0.003 to 0.15), medium 0.08 (0.03 to 0.21) and high 0.75 (0.49 to 1.15). In Phase III studies, 263 patients diagnosed with latent TB infection were treated with isoniazid and tofacitinib concurrently; none developed TB. For OIs other than TB, 34 events were reported (crude IR 0.25 (95% CI 0.18 to 0.36)).
CONCLUSIONS: Within the global tofacitinib RA development programme, TB was the most common OI reported but was rare in regions of low and medium TB incidence. Patients who screen positive for latent TB can be treated with isoniazid during tofacitinib therapy.
Background: Tofacitinib is an oral JAK inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). ORAL Scan was a 2-year, randomised, Phase 3, clinical trial that evaluated tofacitinib therapy with background methotrexate (MTX) in patients (pts) with RA and an inadequate response (IR) to MTX.1 Objectives: To study the effect of MTX dose on tofacitinib efficacy in pts from the ORAL Scan study. Methods: In ORAL Scan, MTX-IR pts with RA were randomised 4:4:1:1 to tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily (BID), tofacitinib 10 mg BID, or placebo with advancement to 5 mg BID or to 10 mg BID at Month (Mo) 3 or Mo 6, in combination with background MTX. MTX dose was stable throughout the study and was categorised as Low (≤12.5 mg/week), Medium (>12.5 to <17.5 mg/week), or High (≥17.5 mg/week). Endpoints evaluated at Mo 6 included ACR response rates, proportion of pts achieving low disease activity measured by Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI ≤10), CDAI defined remission rate (CDAI ≤2.8), proportion of pts achieving an improvement ≥0.5 in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), and least squares mean change from baseline in HAQ-DI, Disease Activity Score (DAS28-4[ESR]) and CDAI. Binary variables were evaluated with non-responder imputation, and continuous variables were analysed using a longitudinal model. Regression analyses were conducted to evaluate efficacy responses by MTX dose group and other covariates. Results: 797 pts were randomised and treated (tofacitinib 5 mg BID, n=321; tofacitinib 10 mg BID, n=316; placebo, n=160). In total, 242 pts were included in the Low MTX (9 mg mean) dose group, 333 in the Medium MTX (15 mg mean) dose group, and 222 in the High MTX (21 mg mean) dose group. Baseline demographics and disease characteristics were generally similar across MTX dose groups, though weight, BMI, glucocorticoid (GC) use and CDAI were higher in the High MTX dose group. At Mo 6, greater efficacy was seen with tofacitinib compared with placebo for all endpoints across the 3 MTX dose groups (Table). Efficacy for placebo-treated pts was generally numerically greater in the Medium and High MTX dose groups than in the Low MTX dose group. Efficacy with tofacitinib appeared similar regardless of MTX dose group. Regression analyses demonstrated a lack of effect of BMI, GC use and MTX dose groups on efficacy assessments. Conclusions: In this post-hoc analysis, clinical efficacy of tofacitinib at Mo 6 was greater than placebo, and appeared similar regardless of MTX dose, as in these pts, tofacitinib was added to patients that had an inadequate response to MTX. Higher MTX doses did not appear to result in additional efficacy to tofacitinib than lower doses. A randomised clinical trial is needed in which different doses of MTX are added to tofacitinib in MTX-naïve pts in order to examine the effect of MTX dose on tofacitinib efficacy. (Table Presented).
OBJECTIVE: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic, autoimmune disease characterized by joint destruction. Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of RA. This post hoc analysis assessed the safety of tofacitinib in Latin American (LA) patients with RA versus the Rest of World (RoW) population.
METHODS: Data were pooled from 14 clinical studies of tofacitinib: six Phase 2, six Phase 3 and two long-term extension studies. Incidence rates (IRs; patients with events/100 patient-years of treatment exposure) were calculated for safety events of special interest combined across tofacitinib doses. 95% confidence intervals (CI) for IRs were calculated using the maximum likelihood method. Descriptive comparisons were made between LA and RoW (excluding LA) populations.
RESULTS: This analysis included data from 984 LA patients and 4687 RoW patients. IRs for safety events of special interest were generally similar between LA and RoW populations, with overlapping 95% CIs. IRs for discontinuation due to adverse events, serious infections, tuberculosis, all herpes zoster (HZ), serious HZ, malignancies (excluding non-melanoma skin cancer) and major adverse cardiovascular events were numerically lower for LA versus RoW patients; IR for mortality was numerically higher. No lymphoma was reported in the LA population versus eight cases in the RoW population. Exposure (extent and length) was lower in the LA population (2148.33 patient-years [mean = 2.18 years]) versus RoW (10515.68 patient-years [mean = 2.24 years]).
CONCLUSION: This analysis of pooled data from clinical studies of tofacitinib in patients with RA demonstrates that tofacitinib has a consistent safety profile across LA and RoW patient populations.
Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This post hoc analysis investigated the effect of methotrexate (MTX) dose on the efficacy of tofacitinib in patients with RA. ORAL Scan (NCT00847613) was a 2-year, randomized, Phase 3 trial evaluating tofacitinib in MTX-inadequate responder (IR) patients with RA. Patients received tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg twice daily (BID), or placebo, with low (≤12.5 mg/week), moderate (>12.5 to <17.5 mg/week), or high (≥17.5 mg/week) stable background MTX. Efficacy endpoints (at months 3 and 6) included American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20/50/70 response rates, and mean change from baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI), Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28)–4(erythrocyte sedimentation rate [ESR]), Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), and modified Total Sharp score. 797 patients were treated with tofacitinib 5 mg BID (N = 321), tofacitinib 10 mg BID (N = 316), or placebo (N = 160); 242, 333, and 222 patients received low, moderate, and high MTX doses, respectively. At months 3 and 6, ACR20/50/70 response rates were greater for both tofacitinib doses vs placebo across all MTX doses. At month 3, mean changes from baseline in CDAI and HAQ-DI were significantly greater for both tofacitinib doses vs placebo, irrespective of MTX category; improvements were maintained at month 6. Both tofacitinib doses demonstrated improvements in DAS28–4(ESR), and less structural progression vs placebo, across MTX doses at month 6. Tofacitinib plus MTX showed greater clinical and radiographic efficacy than placebo in MTX-IR patients with RA, regardless of MTX dose.
OBJECTIVES: Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We evaluated the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg twice daily (BID), in patients with moderate to severe RA, aged ≥65 and <65 years.
METHODS: Data were pooled from five Phase 3 trials and, separately, from two open-label long-term extension (LTE) studies (data cut-off April, 2012). Patients received tofacitinib, or placebo (Phase 3 only), with/without conventional synthetic DMARDs (mainly methotrexate). Clinical efficacy outcomes from Phase 3 studies were evaluated at Month 3. Safety evaluations using pooled Phase 3 data (Month 12) and pooled LTE data (Month 24) compared exposure-adjusted incidence rates (IRs; with 95% confidence intervals [CIs]), in older versus younger patients.
RESULTS: In Phase 3 and LTE studies, 15.3% (475/3111) and 16.1% (661/4102) of patients, respectively, were aged ≥65 years. Consequently, exposure to tofacitinib was lower in older versus younger patients in Phase 3 (259.2 vs. 1554.9 patient years [pt-yrs]) and LTE (962.1 vs. 5071.7 pt-yrs) studies. Probability ratios for ACR responses and HAQ-DI improvement from baseline ≥0.22 (Month 3) favoured tofacitinib and were similar in older and younger patients, with overlapping CIs. IRs for SAEs and discontinuations due to AEs were generally numerically higher in older versus younger patients, irrespective of treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: Older patients receiving tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg BID had a similar probability of ACR20 or ACR50 response and, due to comorbidities, a numerically higher risk of SAEs and discontinuations due to AEs compared with younger patients.
OBJECTIVES: Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of RA. The aim of this analysis was to characterize changes in haematological parameters following tofacitinib treatment, and to compare changes in haemoglobin with markers of disease activity, fatigue and vitality.
METHODS: Changes in neutrophil counts, lymphocyte counts and haemoglobin levels were analysed in patients with RA from six phase 3 randomized controlled trials (n = 4271) of tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg bd, placebo or active comparators of up to 24 months' duration, and two long-term extension (LTE) studies (n = 4858) of tofacitinib of up to 84 months' duration. Disease activity markers included CRP and ESR. Fatigue and vitality were assessed using the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) and Short Form Health Survey-36 vitality domain scores.
RESULTS: In phase 3 studies, mean neutrophil and lymphocyte counts decreased and mean haemoglobin levels increased in all tofacitinib treatment groups. Haemoglobin levels and neutrophil counts stabilized in the LTE studies, while lymphocyte count decreases stabilized at approximately month 48. Increased haemoglobin was associated with decreased ESR and CRP levels. Clinically meaningful reductions in haemoglobin levels (⩾3 g/dl from baseline or haemoglobin ⩽7 g/dl) occurred in <1.0% of patients in all treatment groups. FACIT-F and Short Form Health Survey-36 vitality scores were weakly correlated with haemoglobin levels.
CONCLUSION: Small changes in haematological parameters were seen with tofacitinib treatment, which stabilized over time in the LTE studies. Changes in haemoglobin levels, although associated with changes in ESR and CRP, were not associated with fatigue or vitality.
Objetivo. Tofacitinib es un inhibidor oral de la quinasa Janus para el tratamiento de la artritis reumatoide (AR). Este análisis evaluó la eficacia y la seguridad de tofacitinib en la subpoblación Latinoamericana (LA) de los estudios fase 3 y de extensión a largo plazo (ELP). Materiales y métodos. Se agruparon datos de pacientes de Latinoamérica con AR y una respuesta inadecuada a agentes modificadores de la enfermedad (DMARD) de 5 estudios fase 3. Los pacientes en estos estudios recibieron tofacitinib 5 o 10mg/2 veces al día (bid), adalimumab o placebo; los pacientes en el estudio de seguridad recibieron tofacitinib 5 o 10mg/bid; los tratamientos se administraron en monoterapia o con DMARD sintéticos convencionales. La eficacia se reporta hasta 12 (fase 3) y 36 meses (ELP) mediante las tasas de respuesta del Colegio Americano de Reumatología (ACR) 20/50/70, el índice de actividad de la enfermedad (DAS)28-4 ESR (tasa de sedimentación globular [ESR]) y el índice de discapacidad del cuestionario de evaluación de la salud (HAQ-DI). Se reportan las tasas de incidencia (IR: pacientes con evento/100 pacientes/año) de eventos adversos (EA) de interés especial. Resultados. Los estudios fase 3, incluyeron 496 pacientes de LA, el ELP reclutó 756 pacientes de fase 2 y fase 3. En los estudios de fase 3, los pacientes que recibieron tofacitinib 5 y 10mg/bid presentaron mejorías vs placebo al mes 3 en las respuestas ACR20 (68,9% y 75,7% vs 35,6%), ACR50 (45,8% y 49,7% vs 20,7%) y ACR70 (17,5% y 23,1% vs 6,9%), en cambio, desde el valor basal en el escore HAQ-DI (−0,6 y −0,8 vs −0,3) y en el escore DAS28-4(ESR) (−2,3 y −2,4 vs −1,4); estas mejorías fueron sostenidas hasta el mes 36, último mes de evaluación en el estudio de ELP. En los pacientes con tofacitinib 5 o 10mg/bid y placebo, las tasas de incidencia de SAE fueron de 7,99, 6,57 y 9,84, mientras que la incidencia de descontinuaciones por EA fueron de 3,87, 5,28 y 3,26, respectivamente. Las IR de EA de interés especial en pacientes de LA fueron similares a la población global. Conclusión. En los pacientes de LA con AR de estudios fase 3 y ELP, tofacitinib demostró eficacia hasta por 36 meses con un perfil de seguridad manejable hasta por 60 meses, en los pacientes de LA con AR, datos consistentes con el de la población global de los estudios de tofacitinib (AU)
Objetivos: Tofacitinib es un inhibidor de la cinasa Janus para el tratamiento de la artritis reumatoide (AR). Se evaluaron la eficacia y la seguridad de tofacitinib en pacientes mexicanos a partir de los estudios fase 3 y de extensión a largo plazo (ELP) de AR. Métodos: Datos de pacientes mexicanos con AR y respuesta inadecuada a fármacos antirreumáticos modificadores de la enfermedad (FARME) fueron tomados de 4 estudios fase 3 y de un estudio abierto de ELP de tofacitinib. Los pacientes recibieron tofacitinib 5 o 10mg 2 veces al día, adalimumab (en un estudio fase 3) o placebo (en 4 estudios fase 3) como monoterapia o en combinación con FARME sintético convencional. Se evaluó la eficacia al mes 12 (fase 3) y al mes 36 (ELP) por medio de las tasas de respuesta del Colegio Americano de Reumatología 20/50/70, el puntaje de actividad de la enfermedad (DAS) 28-4, velocidad de sedimentación globular y el índice de discapacidad del cuestionario de evaluación de la salud (HAQ-DI). Se evaluó la seguridad a través de los estudios, incluyendo tasas de incidencia (IR; pacientes con evento/100 pacientes-año). Resultados: Ciento diecinueve y 212 pacientes mexicanos fueron incluidos en el análisis de los estudios fase 3 y de extensión a largo plazo, respectivamente. Pacientes tratados con tofacitinib en los estudios fase 3, numéricamente, tuvieron una mayor mejoría en las respuestas de eficacia en comparación con el placebo al mes 3. La eficacia fue sostenida en los estudios fase 3 y de extensión a largo plazo. Las tasas de incidencia de los eventos adversos de especial interés fueron similares a aquellas con tofacitinib en la población global y latinoamericana. Conclusiones: En pacientes mexicanos del programa global de tofacitinib en AR, la eficacia de tofacitinib se demostró hasta el mes 12 en los estudios fase 3 y hasta el mes 36 en el estudio de extensión a largo plazo, con un perfil de seguridad consistente con el de la población global de los estudios de tofacitinib
OBJECTIVE: Tofacitinib is an oral JAK inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The phase III, 24-month, placebo-controlled Oral Rheumatoid Arthritis (ORAL) Scan trial was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy, including inhibition of structural progression, and safety of tofacitinib in patients with active RA and an inadequate response to methotrexate (MTX). Month 24 data from the completed study are reported here.
METHODS: Patients were randomized 4:4:1:1 to receive tofacitinib 5 mg or 10 mg twice daily, or placebo, switched to tofacitinib 5 mg or 10 mg twice daily, with stable background MTX. Patients receiving placebo switched to tofacitinib at month 3 (nonresponders) or month 6 (remaining patients). Clinical efficacy, structural progression, and treatment-emergent adverse events were evaluated. Analyses were performed on the full analysis set with observed data or nonresponder imputation with no advancement penalty for clinical efficacy, and imputation by linear extrapolation for structural progression.
RESULTS: Overall, 797 patients were treated; 539 (67.6%) completed 24 months of treatment. Responses according to the American College of Rheumatology criteria for 20% improvement (ACR20), ACR50, and ACR70; the proportion of patients in whom remission or low disease activity was achieved according to the 4-variable Disease Activity Score in 28 joints using the erythrocyte sedimentation rate, Clinical Disease Activity Index, or Simplified Disease Activity Index; Boolean remission; and Health Assessment Questionnaire disability index scores were maintained from month 12 to 24 and were similar between tofacitinib dosages. Limited structural damage was observed at months 12 and 24. Safety events were similar in type and frequency for both tofacitinib dosages, and were consistent with those previously reported.
CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that clinical and radiographic treatment effects are sustained in months 12-24 in patients with RA receiving tofacitinib 5 mg or 10 mg twice daily plus MTX. The safety profile is consistent with that of other tofacitinib studies.
OBJECTIVE: Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The Phase 3, 24-month, placebo-controlled trial, ORAL Scan (NCT00847613), evaluated tofacitinib efficacy, including structural progression, and safety in patients with active RA and methotrexate inadequate response (MTX-IR). 12-month data were reported previously; Month 24 data from the completed study are reported here.
METHODS: Patients were randomized 4:4:1:1 to tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg twice daily (BID), or placebo→tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg BID, with stable, background MTX. Patients receiving placebo advanced to tofacitinib at Month 3 (non-responders) or Month 6 (remaining patients). Clinical efficacy, structural progression, and treatment-emergent adverse events were evaluated. Analyses were performed on the full analysis set with observed or non-responder imputation with no advancement penalty for clinical efficacy and imputation by linear extrapolation for structural progression.
RESULTS: Overall, 797 patients were treated; 539 (67.6%) completed 24 months' treatment. ACR20/50/70 responses, proportions of patients achieving DAS28-4(ESR)-defined remission or low disease activity, Clinical Disease Activity Index, Simplified Disease Activity Index and Boolean remission, and Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index were maintained through Months 12-24 and were similar between tofacitinib doses. Limited structural damage was observed at Months 12 and 24. Safety events were similar in type and frequency for both tofacitinib doses, and were consistent with those previously reported.
CONCLUSION: In patients with RA receiving tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg BID plus MTX, clinical and radiographic treatment effects were sustained through Months 12-24. The safety profile was consistent with other tofacitinib studies. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
OBJECTIVES: Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Here we present data from the completed Phase 3 randomised controlled trial (RCT) ORAL Scan (NCT00847613), which evaluated the impact of tofacitinib on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) through 24 months in patients with active RA and inadequate responses to methotrexate (MTX-IR).
METHODS: Patients were randomised 4:4:1:1 to receive tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg twice daily (BID), or placebo advanced to tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg, plus background MTX. Patients receiving placebo advanced to tofacitinib at month 3 (non-responders) or month 6 (remaining patients). Mean changes from baseline in PROs, assessed at months 1-24, included Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index, Patient Global Assessment of disease activity (visual analogue scale [VAS]), Patient Assessment of Arthritis Pain (VAS), health-related quality of life (Short Form-36 version 2), Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue and Medical Outcomes Study-Sleep.
RESULTS: Overall, 539/797 (67.6%) patients completed 24 months' treatment. At month 3, tofacitinib-treated patients reported signi cant (p<0.05) mean changes from baseline versus placebo across all PROs, and significantly more patients reported improvements ≥ minimum clinically important differences versus placebo. Improvements in PROs with tofacitinib were sustained to month 24. Following advancement to tofacitinib, placebo-treated patients generally reported changes of similar magnitude to tofacitinib-treated patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with RA and MTX-IR receiving tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg BID plus MTX reported significant and clinically meaningful improvements in PROs versus placebo at month 3, which were sustained through 24 months.
This study is designed to provide safety and efficacy data to support the development of CP-690,550 in patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis on background of methotrexate.
