Cerrar
3 Referencias ( articles) loading Revertir Estudificar

Estudio primario

No clasificado

Registro de estudios ISRCTN registry
Año 2008
Cargando información sobre las referencias
Early, aggressive treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) has been proven to lower disease activity and suppress radiologic progression. Moreover, combination therapy is shown to be superior to monotherapy. The combination therapy with rheumatoid arthritis (COBRA) therapy is effective in several trials, and the positive effect on radiologic progression sustained over time. In a recent trial (BeSt [treatment strategies for Rheumatoid Arthritis] = see. for more details of this trial) comparing different treatment strategies the COBRA therapy and initial therapy with infliximab (a tumour necrotising factor [TNF]-blocker) were equally effective in improving functional ability and preventing radiographic damage. Apparently most rheumatologists and or patients have resistance in prescribing this therapy.

Estudio primario

No clasificado

Revista Annals of the rheumatic diseases
Año 2014
Cargando información sobre las referencias
Background Early, intensive treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with the combination of (initially high dose) prednisolone, methotrexate and sulfasalazine (COBRA therapy) considerably lowers disease activity and suppresses radiological progression, but is infrequently prescribed in daily practice. Attenuating the COBRA regimen might lessen concerns about side effects, but the efficacy of such strategies is unknown. Objective To compare the 'COBRA-light' strategy with only two drugs, comprising a lower dose of prednisolone (starting at 30 mg/day, tapered to 7.5 mg/day in 9 weeks) and methotrexate (escalated to 25 mg/week in 9 weeks) to COBRA therapy ( prednisolone 60 mg/day, tapered to 7.5 mg/day in 6 weeks, methotrexate 7.5 mg/week and sulfasalazine 2 g/day). Method An open, randomised controlled, noninferiority trial in 164 patients with early active RA, all treated according to a treat to target strategy. Results: At baseline patients had moderately active disease: mean (SD) 44-joint disease activity score (DAS44) 4.13 (0.81) for COBRA and 3.95 (0.9) for COBRA-light. After 6 months, DAS44 significantly decreased in both groups (-2.50 (1.21) for COBRA and -2.18 (1.10) for COBRA-light). The adjusted difference in DAS44 improvement between the groups, 0.21 (95% CI -0.11 to 0.53), was smaller than the predefined clinically relevant difference of 0.5. Minimal disease activity (DAS44 <1.6) was reached in almost half of patients in both groups (49% and 41% in COBRA and COBRA-light, respectively). Conclusions: At 6 months COBRA-light therapy is most likely non-inferior to COBRA therapy.

Estudio primario

No clasificado

Revista Annals of the rheumatic diseases
Año 2015
Cargando información sobre las referencias
Background Recently, we documented the likely non-inferiority of Combinatietherapie Bij Reumatoïde Artritis (COBRA)-light therapy (methotrexate increased to 25 mg/week with initial prednisolone 30 mg/day) compared with the original COBRA therapy (methotrexate 7.5 mg/week, sulfasalazine 2 g/day, with initial prednisolone 60 mg/day) after 26 weeks in patients with early active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Objective To assess the non-inferiority of COBRA-light versus COBRA after 1 year in terms of disease activity (DAS44), functional outcome (Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ)) and radiographic progression (Sharp/van der Heijde score (SHS)), and to assess the effect of adding etanercept. Methods An open-label, randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial of 162 patients with active early RA, following a treat-to-target protocol incorporating the addition of etanercept if DAS44 =1.6 at weeks 26 or 39. Results Both groups showed major improvements in DAS44 after 52 weeks: mean (SD) -2.41 (1.2) in the COBRA and -2.02 (1.0) in the COBRA-light group (p=ns). In both groups, functional ability improved and radiological progression of joints was minimal. At least one adverse event was reported in 96% of the patients in both groups. In total, 25 serious adverse events occurred: 9 vs 16 in COBRA and COBRA-light, respectively. Treatment actually instituted was often less intensive than required by the protocol: of the total population, 108 patients (67%) required etanercept (more in the COBRA-light group), but only 67 of these (62%) actually received it. Conclusions Intensive COBRA or COBRA-light therapy has major, comparably favourable effects on disease activity, functional ability and radiological outcome after 1 year in patients with early RA. Protocolised addition of etanercept was often not implemented by treating rheumatologists, and patients receiving it appeared to have limited added benefit, probably because of low disease activity levels at its initiation. © 2014 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & European League Against Rheumatism.