Acerca de
Acerca de
Nuestros métodos
Reporte actualizado
Multilenguaje
Ayuda
Cómo se usa
Conceptos clave
Preguntas frecuentes
Contacto
Registrarse
Ingresar
العربية
Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Português
中文
×
Correo electrónico:
Contraseña:
¿Olvidó su contraseña?
×
Editar el título del hilo de publicación
Nombre del hilo de publicación
Nombre completo del hilo de publicación
Thread alternative names
Thread phase
×
Borrar hilo de publicación
Está seguro que quiere borrar el hilo de publicación?
? Esta operación no puede ser deshecha.
Kandus et al [provisional name]
(Basiliximab versus daclizumab [provisional name])
ID:
5bd74e747db23a5af5df6d8b
1 Documentos
Export all
Document ID
Agregar al hilo de publicación
Thread ID
Fusionar hilo de publicación
Cerrar
1 Referencias
( articles)
Revertir
Estudificar
Estudio primario
No clasificado
Basiliximab versus daclizumab combined with triple immunosuppression in deceased donor renal transplantation: A prospective, randomized study
Autores
»
Kandus A
,
Arnol M
,
Omahen K
,
Oblak M
,
Vidan-Jeras B
,
Kmetec A
,
Bren AF
Revista
»
Transplantation
Año
»
2010
Enlaces
»
Pubmed
DOI
Cargando información sobre las referencias
Sin resumen
Mostrar resumen
Background. In this prospective, randomized, open-label, single-center study, we compared the efficacy and safety of two anti-interleukin-2 receptor monoclonal antibodies combined with triple immunosuppression. Methods. The adult recipients of at least one human leukocyte antigen-mismatched deceased donor renal graft on cyclosporine microemulsion, mycophenolate mofetil, and methylprednisolone were randomized to induction with basiliximab or daclizumab, given in standard doses. An intent-to-treat analysis of 1-year data assessed the incidence of acute rejections, graft function, patient and graft survival, and safety of this therapy. Results. Two hundred twelve patients were studied. At 12 months, 11 (10.3%) and 10 (9.5%) patients experienced biopsy-confirmed first acute rejection in basiliximab and daclizumab groups, respectively. Estimated glomerular filtration rate was 69±19 mL/min/1.73 m2 in the basiliximab and 66±21 mL/min/1.73 m2 in the daclizumab group. Patient survival was 97.2% with basiliximab and 97.1% with daclizumab, and graft survival was 94.4% vs. 90.5%, respectively. Hospital treatment was required for 50 and 59 infections in basiliximab and daclizumab groups, respectively. One renal cell carcinoma of native kidney and one basal cell carcinoma were detected in the basiliximab group, and one melanoma of skin in the daclizumab group. One hypersensitivity reaction was observed with daclizumab. No significant differences were found between the groups. Conclusion. Basiliximab or daclizumab combined with triple therapy was an efficient and a safe immunosuppression strategy, demonstrated with low incidence of acute rejections, excellent graft function, high survival rates, and acceptable adverse event profile in adult recipients within the 1st year after deceased donor renal transplantation. © 2010 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Esconder resumen
Resumen
Acerca de este artículo
Evidencia relacionada
Background. In this prospective, randomized, open-label, single-center study, we compared the efficacy and safety of two anti-interleukin-2 receptor monoclonal antibodies combined with triple immunosuppression. Methods. The adult recipients of at least one human leukocyte antigen-mismatched deceased donor renal graft on cyclosporine microemulsion, mycophenolate mofetil, and methylprednisolone were randomized to induction with basiliximab or daclizumab, given in standard doses. An intent-to-treat analysis of 1-year data assessed the incidence of acute rejections, graft function, patient and graft survival, and safety of this therapy. Results. Two hundred twelve patients were studied. At 12 months, 11 (10.3%) and 10 (9.5%) patients experienced biopsy-confirmed first acute rejection in basiliximab and daclizumab groups, respectively. Estimated glomerular filtration rate was 69±19 mL/min/1.73 m2 in the basiliximab and 66±21 mL/min/1.73 m2 in the daclizumab group. Patient survival was 97.2% with basiliximab and 97.1% with daclizumab, and graft survival was 94.4% vs. 90.5%, respectively. Hospital treatment was required for 50 and 59 infections in basiliximab and daclizumab groups, respectively. One renal cell carcinoma of native kidney and one basal cell carcinoma were detected in the basiliximab group, and one melanoma of skin in the daclizumab group. One hypersensitivity reaction was observed with daclizumab. No significant differences were found between the groups. Conclusion. Basiliximab or daclizumab combined with triple therapy was an efficient and a safe immunosuppression strategy, demonstrated with low incidence of acute rejections, excellent graft function, high survival rates, and acceptable adverse event profile in adult recipients within the 1st year after deceased donor renal transplantation. © 2010 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.