Close
11 References ( articles) loading Revert Studify

Primary study

Unclassified

Auteurs Bayer
Registry of Trials clinicaltrials.gov
Year 2007
Loading references information
This is a multicenter, randomized, open-label, assessor-blind, event-driven, non-inferiority program for efficacy with a study treatment duration of 3, 6 or 12 months in patients with confirmed acute symptomatic pulmonary embolism (PE) with or without symptomatic Deep-Vein Thrombosis (DVT) (Einstein-PE).

Primary study

Unclassified

Journal Blood
Year 2012
Loading references information

Primary study

Unclassified

Loading references information
CONTEXTE: Un régime à dose fixe de rivaroxaban, un inhibiteur du facteur Xa par voie orale, a été montré pour être aussi efficace qu'un traitement anticoagulant standard pour le traitement de la thrombose veineuse profonde, sans la nécessité d'une surveillance en laboratoire. Cette approche peut également simplifier le traitement de l'embolie pulmonaire. Méthodes: Dans une, open-label, essai de non infériorité event-driven randomisé portant sur 4832 patients ayant subi une embolie pulmonaire symptomatique aiguës avec ou sans thrombose veineuse profonde, nous avons comparé le rivaroxaban (15 mg deux fois par jour pendant 3 semaines, suivie par 20 mg une fois par jour) avec un traitement standard par énoxaparine suivie par un antagoniste dose ajustée vitamine K pendant 3, 6 ou 12 mois. Le critère principal d'efficacité était la maladie thromboembolique veineuse symptomatique récurrente. Le résultat principal de sécurité était importante ou des saignements de nonmajor cliniquement pertinente. RÉSULTATS: Le rivaroxaban était non inférieur au traitement standard (marge de non-infériorité, 2,0, p = 0,003) pour le critère principal d'efficacité, avec 50 événements dans le groupe rivaroxaban (2,1%) versus 44 événements dans le groupe de thérapie standard (1,8%) (risque ratio 1,12, intervalle de confiance à 95% [IC], 0,75 à 1,68). Le résultat principal de sécurité a eu lieu dans 10,3% des patients dans le groupe rivaroxaban et 11,4% de ceux dans le groupe de thérapie standard (hazard ratio 0,90, IC 95%, 0,76 à 1,07, p = 0,23). Les saignements majeurs a été observée chez 26 patients (1,1%) dans le groupe rivaroxaban et 52 patients (2,2%) dans le groupe de thérapie standard (hazard ratio 0,49, IC 95%, de 0,31 à 0,79, p = 0,003). Tarif des autres événements indésirables étaient similaires dans les deux groupes. CONCLUSIONS: un régime à dose fixe de rivaroxaban seul était non inférieur au traitement standard pour le traitement initial et à long terme de l'embolie pulmonaire et a eu une amélioration potentielle profil bénéfice-risque. (Financé par Bayer HealthCare et Janssen Pharmaceuticals;. EINSTEIN-PE nombre ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00439777).

Primary study

Unclassified

Journal Blood
Year 2012
Loading references information

Primary study

Unclassified

Auteurs Wang, Y , Wang, C
Journal Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
Year 2013
Loading references information

Primary study

Unclassified

Journal JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS
Year 2013
Loading references information

Primary study

Unclassified

Journal Thrombosis journal
Year 2013
Loading references information
Background: The worldwide EINSTEIN DVT and EINSTEIN PE studies randomized 8282 patients with acute symptomatic deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) and/or pulmonary embolism (PE) and, for the first time in trials in this setting, included patients in China. This analysis evaluates the results of these studies in this subgroup of patients. Methods: A total of 439 Chinese patients who had acute symptomatic DVT (n=211), or PE with or without DVT (n=228), were randomized to receive rivaroxaban (15 mg twice daily for 21 days, followed by 20 mg once daily) or standard therapy of enoxaparin overlapping with and followed by an adjusted-dose vitamin K antagonist, for 3, 6, or 12 months. The primary efficacy outcome was symptomatic recurrent venous thromboembolism. The principal safety outcome was major or non-major clinically relevant bleeding. Results: The primary efficacy outcome occurred in seven (3.2%) of the 220 patients in the rivaroxaban group and in seven (3.2%) of the 219 patients in the standard-therapy group (hazard ratio, 1.04; 95% confidence interval 0.36-3.0; p=0.94). The principal safety outcome occurred in 13 (5.9%) patients in the rivaroxaban group and in 20 (9.2%) patients in the standard-therapy group (hazard ratio, 0.63; 95% confidence interval 0.31-1.26; p=0.19). Major bleeding was observed in no patients in the rivaroxaban group and in five (2.3%) patients in the standard-therapy group. In fragile patients (defined as age >75 years, creatinine clearance <50 mL/min, and/or body weight ≤50 kg), the principal safety outcome occurred in four (8.9%) of the 45 patients who received rivaroxaban compared with seven (15.2%) of the 46 patients who received standard therapy. Conclusions: In Chinese patients with acute symptomatic DVT and/or PE, rivaroxaban was as efficacious as enoxaparin followed by vitamin K antagonist therapy, with a similar safety profile. The relative efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban compared with enoxaparin/vitamin K antagonist were consistent with that found in the rest of the world.Trial registration number: EINSTEIN PE, ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00439777; EINSTEIN DVT, ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00440193. © 2013 Wang et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

Primary study

Unclassified

Journal Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH
Year 2013
Loading references information
INTRODUCTION: Little is known about the natural history of clot resolution in the initial weeks of anticoagulant therapy in patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE). Clot resolution of acute PE was assessed with either computed tomography pulmonary angiography scan (CT-scan) or perfusion scintigraphy scan (Q-scan) after 3 weeks of treatment. METHODS: This was a predefined safety analysis of the Einstein PE study, including PE patients, randomized to either enoxaparin with vitamin K antagonist (VKA) or rivaroxaban. A similar scan as at baseline was repeated after 3 weeks. The percentage of vascular obstruction (PVO) was calculated on the basis of a weighted semiquantitative estimation of obstruction. Clot resolution was assessed blindly by calculating the relative change after 3 weeks. RESULTS: PE was diagnosed in 264 patients with CT-scan and in 83 with Q-scan. Baseline characteristics were similar. At baseline, the mean PVO assessed with CT-scan (PVO-CT) and the mean PVO assessed with Q-scan (PVO-Q) were both 21% (standard deviation [SD] 13%) (P = 0.9). The mean relative decrease in PVO was 71% (SD 33%) for PVO-CT, and 62% (SD 36%) for PVO-Q (P = 0.02); complete resolution was observed in 44% (116/264; 95% confidence interval [CI] 38-50%) and 31% (26/83; 95% CI 22-42%) with CT-scan and Q-scan, respectively (P = 0.04). No difference in clot resolution between enoxaparin/VKA and rivaroxaban was found. CONCLUSION: In patients with acute PE, only 3 weeks of anticoagulant treatment leads to complete clot resolution in a considerable proportion of patients, and normalization is more often observed with CT-scan than with Q-scan.

Primary study

Unclassified

Loading references information
Background: Standard treatment for venous thromboembolism (VTE) consists of a heparin combined with vitamin K antagonists. Direct oral anticoagulants have been investigated for acute and extended treatment of symptomatic VTE; their use could avoid parenteral treatment and/or laboratory monitoring of anticoagulant effects.Methods: A prespecified pooled analysis of the EINSTEIN-DVT and EINSTEIN-PE studies compared the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban (15 mg twice-daily for 21 days, followed by 20 mg once-daily) with standard-therapy (enoxaparin 1.0 mg/kg twice-daily and warfarin or acenocoumarol). Patients were treated for 3, 6, or 12 months and followed for suspected recurrent VTE and bleeding. The prespecified noninferiority margin was 1.75.Results: A total of 8282 patients were enrolled; 4151 received rivaroxaban and 4131 received standard-therapy. The primary efficacy outcome occurred in 86 (2.1%) rivaroxaban-treated patients compared with 95 (2.3%) standard-therapy-treated patients (hazard ratio, 0.89; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.66-1.19; pnoninferiority < 0.001). Major bleeding was observed in 40 (1.0%) and 72 (1.7%) patients in the rivaroxaban and standard-therapy groups, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.37-0.79; p = 0.002). In key subgroups, including fragile patients, cancer patients, patients presenting with large clots, and those with a history of recurrent VTE, the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban were similar compared with standard-therapy.Conclusion: The single-drug approach with rivaroxaban resulted in similar efficacy to standard-therapy and was associated with a significantly lower rate of major bleeding. Efficacy and safety results were consistent among key patient subgroups.Trial registration: EINSTEIN-PE: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00439777; EINSTEIN-DVT: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00440193. © 2013 Prins et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

Primary study

Unclassified

Journal The Lancet. Haematology
Year 2014
Loading references information
Background: Patients with venous thromboembolism and cancer have a substantial risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism and bleeding during anticoagulant therapy. Although monotherapy with low-molecular-weight heparin is recommended in these patients, in clinical practice many patients with venous thromboembolism and cancer do not receive this treatment. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of a single-drug regimen with oral rivaroxaban compared with enoxaparin followed by vitamin K antagonists, in the subgroup of patients with cancer enrolled in the EINSTEIN-DVT and EINSTEIN-PE randomised controlled trials. Methods: We did a subgroup analysis of patients with active cancer (either at baseline or diagnosed during the study), a history of cancer, or no cancer who were enrolled in the EINSTEIN-DVT and EINSTEIN-PE trials. Eligible patients with deep-vein thrombosis (EINSTEIN-DVT) or pulmonary embolism (EINSTEIN-PE) were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive rivaroxaban (15 mg twice daily for 21 days, followed by 20 mg once daily) or standard therapy (enoxaparin 1·0 mg/kg twice daily and warfarin or acenocoumarol; international normalised ratio 2·0-3·0). Randomisation with a computerised voice-response system was stratified according to country and intended treatment duration (3, 6, or 12 months). The prespecified primary efficacy and safety outcomes of both the trials and this subanalysis were symptomatic recurrent venous thromboembolism and clinically relevant bleeding, respectively. We did efficacy and mortality analyses in the intention-to-treat population, and bleeding analyses for time spent receiving treatment plus 2 days in the safety population (all patients who received at least one dose of study drug). The EINSTEIN-DVT and EINSTEIN-PE studies are registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, numbers NCT00440193 and NCT00439777. Findings: In patients with active cancer (diagnosed at baseline or during treatment), recurrent venous thromboembolism occurred in 16 (5%) of 354 patients allocated to rivaroxaban and 20 (7%) of 301 patients allocated to enoxaparin and vitamin K antagonist (hazard ratio [HR] 0·67, 95% CI 0·35 to 1·30). Clinically relevant bleeding occurred in 48 (14%) of 353 patients receiving rivaroxaban and in 49 (16%) of 298 patients receiving standard therapy (HR 0·80, 95% CI 0·54 to 1·20). Major bleeding occurred in eight (2%) of 353 patients receiving rivaroxaban and in 15 (5%) of 298 patients receiving standard therapy (HR 0·42, 95% CI 0·18 to 0·99). The overall frequency of recurrent venous thromboembolism in patients with only a history of cancer (five [2%] of 233 patients in the rivaroxaban group vs five [2%] of 236 in the standard therapy group; HR 0·98, 95% CI 0·28-3·43) was similar to that of patients without cancer (65 [2%] of 3563 vs 70 [2%] of 3594, respectively; HR 0·93, 95% CI 0·66-1·30), but the frequency was increased in patients with active cancer at baseline (six [2%] of 258 vs eight [4%] of 204, respectively; HR 0·62, 95% CI 0·21-1·79) and most markedly increased in patients whose diagnosis of cancer was made during the study (ten [10%] of 96 vs 12 [12%] of 97, respectively; HR 0·80, 95% CI 0·34-1·88). The overall frequency of major bleeding in patients with only a history of cancer (one [<1%] patient in the rivaroxaban group vs four [2%] patients in the standard therapy group; HR 0·23, 95% CI 0·03-2·06) was similar to that of patients without cancer (31 [1%] vs 53 [1%], respectively; HR 0·58, 95% CI 0·37-0·91), but was increased in patients with active cancer at baseline (five [2%] vs eight [4%], respectively; HR 0·47, 95% CI 0·15-1·45) and was highest in those with cancer diagnosed during the study (three [3%] vs seven [7%], respectively; HR 0·33, 95% CI 0·08-1·31). Interpretation: In patients with active cancer and venous thromboembolism, rivaroxaban had similar efficacy to prevent recurrence of venous thromboembolism and reduced the number major bleeding events compared with treatment with enoxaparin and a vitamin K antagonist, although there was no difference between groups for clinically relevant bleeding. Based on these results, a head-to-head comparison of rivaroxaban with long-term low-molecularweight heparin in patients with cancer is warranted.

Primary study

Unclassified

Journal Current medical research and opinion
Year 2014
Loading references information
Abstract OBJECTIVE: The phase III EINSTEIN DVT and EINSTEIN PE trials demonstrated the potential of oral rivaroxaban for the treatment of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE). The length of initial hospitalization in patients presenting with either symptomatic DVT or PE was assessed using hospitalization records from these trials. METHODS: Analyses were carried out in the intention-to-treat population, using non-parametric and parametric statistical methods. RESULTS: Overall, 52% (1781/3434) of EINSTEIN DVT patients and 90% (4328/4821) of EINSTEIN PE patients were admitted to hospital. The proportion of hospitalized patients with a length of stay of five or fewer days receiving rivaroxaban was 54% compared with 31% for enoxaparin/vitamin K antagonist (VKA) in patients with DVT. For patients with PE, the corresponding values were 45% and 33%. Stays of 6-10 days were observed in 29% of rivaroxaban-treated patients compared with 45% of enoxaparin/VKA-treated patients for DVT. For patients with PE, these values were 39% and 46% in the rivaroxaban and enoxaparin/VKA groups, respectively. Overall, length of stay was significantly shorter in the rivaroxaban group, compared with the enoxaparin/VKA group across all analyses performed (p &lt; 0.0001). Across regions, the observed admission rates and length of stay duration varied greatly: Asia had the longest overall hospitalization rates, whereas the lowest rates were reported in North America, Australia and New Zealand. Nevertheless, a consistent trend was observed: length of hospital stay in patients with DVT or PE receiving rivaroxaban was shorter than, or at least similar to, patients receiving enoxaparin/VKA. CONCLUSION: A single-drug regimen with rivaroxaban may reduce the burden on healthcare systems and patients, and provides effective and well tolerated treatment. The studies shared an open-label design that allowed comparison of initial hospitalization, but limitations include the well monitored clinical trial setting in which decisions on admission and discharge could vary from real-world management.