Close
3 References ( articles) loading Revert Studify

Primary study

Unclassified

Registry of Trials clinicaltrials.gov
Year 2003
Loading references information
The purpose of this study was to explore trends in safety and efficacy, and to find the optimal dose for the subsequent phase III trial. The decision to initiate the phase III trial will depend on both safety (incidence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage) and efficacy (reperfusion measured by MRI and correlating with clinical outcome) profiles. The safety (incidence of symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage) and efficacy (reperfusion measured by MRI and correlating with clinical outcome) profiles gained from this study were the basis of planning the phase III.

Primary study

Unclassified

期刊 Stroke
Year 2006
Loading references information
背景与目的:去氨普酶是一种新型纤溶酶原激活物在体外的有利功能与可用的代理。这项研究评估急性缺血性中风发病后3至9个小时的MRI灌注/扩散不匹配的患者静脉注射(IV)去氨普酶的安全性和有效性。 方法:DEDAS是一项安慰剂对照,双盲,随机,剂量递增研究,剂量为90微克/千克和125微克/公斤去氨普酶。资格准则,包括基线国立卫生卒中量表(NIHSS评分)4得分20和MRI灌注/扩散不匹配的证据。安全终点是症状性颅内出血率。主要疗效终点为磁共振灌注4至8小时后,在90天的治疗和良好的临床疗效。主要的分析是意向性治疗。揭盲,目标人口,不包括违反特定的MRI标准的患者,之前被定义。 结果:36名病人随机接受治疗(意向性治疗,安慰剂:N = 8; 90微克/千克:N = 14; 125微克/千克:N = 15)。没有症状的颅内出血发生。再灌注达到37.5%(95%CI [8.5,75.5])服用安慰剂的患者中,18.2%(2.3,51.8),90微克/公斤去氨普酶治疗的患者和53.3%(26.6 78.7)的患者治疗125去氨普酶微克/公斤。在90天的临床疗效好发生在25.0%与安慰剂组(3.2,65.1),28.6%(8.4,58.1); 125微克/公斤去氨普酶治疗的90微克/千克去氨普酶和60.0%(83.7 32.3)治疗。(N = 25),在目标人群的差异,与安慰剂相比增加为125微克/公斤去氨普酶(p = 0.022),良好的临床疗效统计显着。 结论:四去氨普酶治疗缺血性中风发病3至9个小时后出现的安全。在125微克/公斤剂量的去氨普酶,以提高临床疗效,特别是在完成所有的MRI标准的患者。的DEDAS结果普遍支持去氨普酶在急性缺血性中风(DIAS),其前身的研究结果。

Primary study

Unclassified

期刊 Stroke
Year 2012
Loading references information
Desmoteplase is a novel, highly fibrin-specific and non-neurotoxic thrombolytic agent. Evidence of safety and efficacy was obtained in two phase II trials (DIAS and DEDAS). The DIAS-2 phase III trial did not replicate the positive phase II efficacy findings. Post-hoc analyses were performed with the aim of predicting treatment responders based on CT and MR angiography. The predictive value of infarct volume and TIMI grade at baseline with respect to drug response measured by clinical outcome at Day 90 was investigated using DIAS-2 data. Patients were grouped according to vessel status (TIMI grade) for logistic regression of clinical response, applying the data from DIAS-2 as well as the pooled data from DIAS, DEDAS, and DIAS-2. In DIAS-2, a substantial number of mismatch-selected patients (126/179, 70%) presented with a normal flow/low-grade stenosis (TIMI 2-3) at screening, the majority having a favorable outcome at Day 90. In contrast, favorable outcome rates in patients with vessel occlusion/high-grade stenosis (TIMI 0-1) were 18% with placebo versus 36% and 27% with desmoteplase 90 and 125 μg/kg, respectively. The clinical effect size based on the pooled data from DIAS, DEDAS, and DIAS-2 was borderline statistically significantly different (P=0.05) in the TIMI 0-1 and TIMI 2-3 subgroups. It was favorable for desmoteplase-treated patients presenting with TIMI 0-1 at baseline (odds ratio, 4.144; 95% CI, 1.40-12.23; P=0.010), while there was no desmoteplase treatment benefit in patients presenting with TIMI 2-3 (odds ratio, 1.109). In this sample of patients diagnosed with a mismatch, proximal vessel occlusion or severe stenosis was associated with clinically beneficial treatment effects of desmoteplase. Selecting patients using CT or MR angiography in clinical trials of thrombolytic therapy is justifiable.