BACKGROUND: Crohn disease is an inflammatory bowel disease with intermittent symptoms relating to damage to the gastrointestinal tract. Compared with adult-onset Crohn disease, the childhood-onset form is more likely to be severe. Infliximab has shown efficacy in adult patients.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the efficacy and safety of infliximab in pediatric Crohn disease, by means of a systematic review.
DATA SOURCES: Three databases (MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) and regulatory documents were searched from inception to December 2017. Clinical trial registries, conference abstracts, and reference lists were searched to March 2018.
STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective cohort studies that compared infliximab with active control were included in the analysis. Two reviewers independently performed screening, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. The primary outcomes were induction and maintenance of endoscopic remission and severe adverse effects.
DATA SYNTHESIS: Three eligible RCTs comparing different dose regimens, 16 prospective cohort studies comparing infliximab with other therapies (adalimumab, exclusive enteral nutrition, or standard of care), and 3 prospective cohort studies comparing different infliximab regimens were identified. Meta-analysis of the RCTs showed no significant difference between infliximab every 8 weeks compared with longer intervals for maintenance of clinical remission (risk ratio [RR] 1.76, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.98-3.19). Meta-analyses of the prospective cohort studies showed no significant differences between infliximab and adalimumab for maintenance of endoscopic remission (RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.60-1.92), between infliximab and exclusive enteral nutrition for induction of clinical remission (RR 1.09, 95% CI 0.82-1.45), or between infliximab and standard of care for maintenance of clinical remission at 6 and 12 months (RR 1.12, 95% CI 0.58-2.17, and RR 1.24, 95% CI 0.84-1.84, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence suggested comparable efficacy for infliximab and other therapies; however, the available literature was limited by risk of bias and small sample size. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm the efficacy and safety of this drug in pediatric Crohn disease.
BACKGROUND: Many studies have examined the effects of exclusive enteral nutrition (EEN) in children with Crohn's disease (CD), but corticosteroids are considered a superior therapy and are frequently used in China. This meta-analysis aims to compare the efficacy of EEN with corticosteroids in treating pediatric CD.
METHODS: A comprehensive retrieval from medical databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Wanfang data, VIP and CNKI, was performed using the search terms "diet therapy", "exclusive enteral nutrition", "Crohn's disease", "inflammatory bowel diseases", "child" and "pediatrics" from January 1990 to April 2017.
RESULTS: We included 18 studies from 1329 identified sources in this meta-analysis. EEN was as effective as corticosteroids in inducing remission rate of children suffering from CD (OR = 1.35; 95% CI 0.90, 2.10; P = 0.14). Nevertheless, patients who received EEN were more likely to achieve both endoscopic mucosal healing (OR = 5.24; 95% CI 2.06, 13.37; P = 0.0005) and histological mucosal healing (OR = 4.78; 95% CI 1.89, 12.08; P = 0.0009) than those who received corticosteroids; the Pediatric Crohn's Disease Activity Index was lower [mean difference (MD) = - 3.67; 95% CI - 4.91, - 2.43] and weight gain was higher (MD = 1.92; 95% CI 0.02, 3.83; P = 0.05) in those patients who received EEN than in those who received corticosteroids. No difference was found in relapse rate (OR = 0.57; 95% CI 0.25, 1.29; P = 0.18), height for age or body mass index between the patients treated with EEN and corticosteroids at the 1-year end point.
CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis reveals that there is no significant difference between EEN and corticosteroids in the efficacy of inducing remission rate of CD in a pediatric population, but EEN is superior to corticosteroids in improving short-term mucosal inflammation and reducing the PCDAI index.
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic disease mediated by the immune system and is characterized by inflammation of the gastrointestinal tract. One of the possible treatments for this pathology is a change in the type of diet, of which enteral nutrition (EN) is one. This study is to understand how the use of EN can affect the adult population diagnosed with IBD. We conducted a systematic review, meta-analysis, and a meta-regression. On the different databases (MEDLINE, Scopus, Cochrane, LILACS, CINAHL, WOS), we found 363 registers with an accuracy of 12% (44 registers). After a full-text review, only 30 research studies were selected for qualitative synthesis and 11 for meta-analysis and meta-regression. The variables used were Crohn's disease activity index (CDAI), C-reactive protein (CRP), and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). EN has been shown to have efficacy for the treatment of Crohn's disease and is compatible with other medicines. As for the CDAI or rates of remission, there were no differences between enteral and parenteral nutrition. Polymeric formulas have shown better results with respect to the CRP. The long-term treatment could dilute the good CDAI results that are obtained at the start of the EN treatment.
BACKGROUND: This systematic review critically analyzes the current research on micronutrient deficiency in children with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and synthesizes these data to provide evidence-based guidelines for nutritional surveillance in this population.
METHODS: We searched 5 databases (Ovid Medline, PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library) for studies evaluating micronutrients in patients with IBD using the following inclusion criteria: 1) original research, 2) published 1996 or later; 3) published in English; 4) human subjects; and 5) containing pediatric data. Studies were reviewed and included based on the strength of research methods. Data on the prevalence of micronutrient deficiencies in pediatric patients with IBD and risk factors for micronutrient deficiency in these patients were extracted from included studies and compared and discussed in preparation of the proposed guidelines and manuscript.
RESULTS: A total of 39 studies were included in the final review. The data presented in these studies show that iron deficiency and vitamin D deficiency are common in pediatric patients with IBD. Vitamin B12 and folate deficiency are rare. Zinc deficiency, while not common, occurs at a higher rate in patients with Crohn's disease than in healthy controls. There was limited data on vitamins A, E, and C, and selenium, but deficiency of these micronutrients seems rare.
CONCLUSIONS: We recommend annual surveillance of iron and vitamin D in pediatric patients with IBD regardless of disease activity or phenotype. Zinc should be monitored annually in patients with Crohn's disease. There is insufficient evidence to support routine screening for other micronutrient deficiencies.
BACKGROUND: Corticosteroids are often preferred over enteral nutrition (EN) as induction therapy for Crohn's disease (CD). Prior meta-analyses suggest that corticosteroids are superior to EN for induction of remission in CD. Treatment failures in EN trials are often due to poor compliance, with dropouts frequently due to poor acceptance of a nasogastric tube and unpalatable formulations. This systematic review is an update of a previously published Cochrane review.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of exclusive EN as primary therapy to induce remission in CD and to examine the importance of formula composition on effectiveness.
SEARCH METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Embase and CENTRAL from inception to 5 July 2017. We also searched references of retrieved articles and conference abstracts.
SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials involving patients with active CD were considered for inclusion. Studies comparing one type of EN to another type of EN or conventional corticosteroids were selected for review.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data were extracted independently by at least two authors. The primary outcome was clinical remission. Secondary outcomes included adverse events, serious adverse events and withdrawal due to adverse events. For dichotomous outcomes, we calculated the risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). A random-effects model was used to pool data. We performed intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses for the primary outcome. Heterogeneity was explored using the Chi
MAIN RESULTS: Twenty-seven studies (1,011 participants) were included. Three studies were rated as low risk of bias. Seven studies were rated as high risk of bias and 17 were rated as unclear risk of bias due to insufficient information. Seventeen trials compared different formulations of EN, 13 studies compared one or more elemental formulas to a non-elemental formula, three studies compared EN diets of similar protein composition but different fat composition, and one study compared non-elemental diets differing in glutamine enrichment. Meta-analysis of 11 trials (378 participants) demonstrated no difference in remission rates. Sixty-four per cent (134/210) of patients in the elemental group achieved remission compared to 62% (105/168) of patients in the non-elemental group (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.18; GRADE very low quality). A per-protocol analysis (346 participants) produced similar results (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.18). Subgroup analyses performed to evaluate the different types of elemental and non-elemental diets (elemental, semi-elemental and polymeric) showed no differences in remission rates. An analysis of 7 trials including 209 patients treated with EN formulas of differing fat content (low fat: < 20 g/1000 kCal versus high fat: > 20 g/1000 kCal) demonstrated no difference in remission rates (RR 1.03; 95% CI 0.85 to 1.26). Very low fat content (< 3 g/1000 kCal) and very low long chain triglycerides demonstrated higher remission rates than higher content EN formulas. There was no difference between elemental and non-elemental diets in adverse event rates (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.63 to 1.60; GRADE very low quality), or withdrawals due to adverse events (RR 1.29, 95% CI 0.80 to 2.09; GRADE very low quality). Common adverse events included nausea, vomiting, diarrhea and bloating.Ten trials compared EN to steroid therapy. Meta-analysis of eight trials (223 participants) demonstrated no difference in remission rates between EN and steroids. Fifty per cent (111/223) of patients in the EN group achieved remission compared to 72% (133/186) of patients in the steroid group (RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.58 to 1.03; GRADE very low quality). Subgroup analysis by age showed a difference in remission rates for adults but not for children. In adults 45% (87/194) of EN patients achieved remission compared to 73% (116/158) of steroid patients (RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.52 to 0.82; GRADE very low quality). In children, 83% (24/29) of EN patients achieved remission compared to 61% (17/28) of steroid patients (RR 1.35, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.97; GRADE very low quality). A per-protocol analysis produced similar results (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.14). The per-protocol subgroup analysis showed a difference in remission rates for both adults (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.70 to 0.95) and children (RR 1.43, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.97). There was no difference in adverse event rates (RR 1.39, 95% CI 0.62 to 3.11; GRADE very low quality). However, patients on EN were more likely to withdraw due to adverse events than those on steroid therapy (RR 2.95, 95% CI 1.02 to 8.48; GRADE very low quality). Common adverse events reported in the EN group included heartburn, flatulence, diarrhea and vomiting, and for steroid therapy acne, moon facies, hyperglycemia, muscle weakness and hypoglycemia. The most common reason for withdrawal was inability to tolerate the EN diet.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Very low quality evidence suggests that corticosteroid therapy may be more effective than EN for induction of clinical remission in adults with active CD. Very low quality evidence also suggests that EN may be more effective than steroids for induction of remission in children with active CD. Protein composition does not appear to influence the effectiveness of EN for the treatment of active CD. EN should be considered in pediatric CD patients or in adult patients who can comply with nasogastric tube feeding or perceive the formulations to be palatable, or when steroid side effects are not tolerated or better avoided. Further research is required to confirm the superiority of corticosteroids over EN in adults. Further research is required to confirm the benefit of EN in children. More effort from industry should be taken to develop palatable polymeric formulations that can be delivered without use of a nasogastric tube as this may lead to increased patient adherence with this therapy.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Endpoints in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of Crohn's disease (CD) are evolving. We performed a systematic review of efficacy and safety outcomes reported in placebo-controlled RCTs of patients with CD.
METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched to March 1, 2017 for placebo-controlled RCTs of adult patients with CD treated with aminosalicylates, immunomodulators, corticosteroids, biologics, and oral small molecules. Efficacy and safety outcomes, definitions, and measurement tools were collected and stratified by decade of publication.
RESULTS: 116 RCTs (81 induction, 44 maintenance, 7 postoperative prevention trials, enrolling 27,263 patients) were included. Clinical efficacy endpoints were reported in all trials, most commonly measured using the Crohn's Disease Activity Index. Thirty-eight unique definitions of clinical response or remission and 32 definitions of loss of response were identified. Definitions of endoscopic response, remission, and endoscopic healing were also heterogeneous, evaluated using the Crohn's Disease Endoscopic Index of Severity, Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease, ulcer resolution, and Rutgeerts' Score for post-operative endoscopic appearance. Histologic outcomes were reported in 11.1%, 2.3%, and 14.3% of induction, maintenance, and postoperative prevention trials, respectively. Biomarker outcomes were reported in 81.5%, 68.2%, and 42.9% of induction, maintenance, and postoperative prevention trials, respectively. Safety outcomes were reported in 93.8%, 97.7%, and 85.7% of induction, maintenance, and postoperative prevention trials, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: In this systematic review, we highlight the heterogeneity in definitions of response and remission and the evolution of outcomes reported in placebo-controlled CD RCTs. Establishing a core outcome set to standardize efficacy and safety endpoint definitions is a research priority in this field.
La cicatrización mucosa es un importante objetivo terapéutico en el manejo de la enfermedad de Crohn (CD) y la colitis ulcerosa (UC). Existen datos limitados sobre la eficacia comparativa de diversas terapias para lograr este resultado. OBJETIVO: Realizar una revisión sistemática y metaanálisis de los productos biológicos para la inducción y el mantenimiento de la cicatrización de la mucosa en la enfermedad de Crohn y la colitis ulcerosa. MÉTODOS: Se realizó una revisión sistemática y un metaanálisis de ensayos controlados aleatorios (ECA) que examinaron la curación de la mucosa como un criterio de valoración de los inmunosupresores, el factor de necrosis tumoral α (anti-TNF) o la terapia con anticuerpos monoclonales anti-integrina, Grave de CD o UC. Se calcularon los tamaños de efecto agrupados para la inducción y el mantenimiento de la cicatrización de la mucosa y se compararon las comparaciones de tratamiento por pares utilizando un metanálisis de la red bayesiana. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron un total de 12 ECA en el metanálisis (inducción de CD - 2, 4 mantenimiento, inducción UC - 8, 5 mantenimiento). La duración del seguimiento fue de 6-12 semanas para la inducción y 32-54 semanas para los ensayos de mantenimiento. En el CD, los anti-TNF fueron más eficaces que el placebo para mantener la cicatrización de la mucosa [28% vs. 1%, Odds ratio (OR) 19,71, intervalo de confianza del 95% (IC) 3,51-110,84]. En UC, los anti-TNF y anti-integrinas fueron más efectivos que el placebo para inducir (45% frente a 30%) y mantener la cicatrización mucosa (33% vs. 18%). En el análisis de la red, el tratamiento con adalimumab fue inferior al infliximab [OR 0,45, 95% de intervalo creíble (CrI) 0,25-0,82] y la combinación infliximab-azatioprina (OR 0,32, 95% CrI 0,12-0,84) para inducir la cicatrización mucosa en UC. No hubo diferencias estadísticamente significativas en pares entre el vedolizumab y los agentes anti-TNF en la UC. Conclusión: Los agentes biológicos anti-TNF y anti-integrina son eficaces para inducir la cicatrización de la mucosa en UC con adalimumab siendo inferior a infliximab o terapia combinada. Infliximab y adalimumab fueron similares en CD.
BACKGROUND: Despite potential adverse-events in a paediatric population, corticosteroids are used to induce remission in paediatric Crohn's disease. Exclusive enteral nutrition also induces remission, but is infrequently used in the USA because corticosteroids are considered the superior therapy. New data have become available since the publication of the most recent meta-analysis in 2007.
AIM: To see if current literature supports the use of EEN versus CS in paediatric populations.
METHODS: All studies with comparator arms of exclusive enteral nutrition and an exclusive corticosteroids, with remission clearly defined were identified by searching eight online databases.
RESULTS: Of 2795 identified sources, nine studies met our inclusion criteria. Eight of these (n = 451), had data that could be abstracted into our meta-analysis. Exclusive enteral nutrition was as effective as corticosteroids in inducing remission (OR = 1.26 [95% CI 0.77, 2.05]) in paediatric Crohn's disease. There was no difference between Exclusive enteral nutrition and corticosteroids efficacy when comparing newly diagnosed Crohn's (OR = 1.61 [95% CI .87, 2.98]) or relapsed (OR = 0.76 [95% CI .29-1.98]). Intestinal healing was significantly more likely among patients receiving Exclusive enteral nutrition compared to corticosteroids (OR = 4.5 [95% CI 1.64, 12.32]). There was no difference in the frequency of biomarker normalisation including CRP (OR = 0.85 [95% CI .44, 1.67]) and faecal calprotectin (OR 2.79 [95% CI .79-10.90]).
CONCLUSIONS: There is no difference in efficacy between Exclusive enteral nutrition and corticosteroids in induction of remission in Crohn's disease in a paediatric population. Exploratory analyses suggest that a greater proportion of patients treated with exclusive enteral nutrition achieved mucosal healing.
INTRODUCCIÓN: La enfermedad de Crohn (CD) y la colitis ulcerosa (CU) tienen un curso progresivo que conduce a hospitalización y cirugía. La capacidad de las terapias existentes para alterar el curso de la enfermedad no está claramente definida. OBJETIVO: Investigar la eficacia comparativa de las terapias inflamatorias intestinales (EII) actualmente disponibles para reducir la hospitalización y la cirugía. MÉTODOS: Se realizó una revisión sistemática en MEDLINE / PubMed para ensayos controlados aleatorios (ECA) publicados entre enero de 1980 y mayo de 2016 que examinaban la eficacia de la terapia biológica o inmunomoduladora en la EII. Se realizaron comparaciones directas de las proporciones agrupadas de hospitalización y cirugía. Se realizaron comparaciones en pares utilizando un metanálisis de red bayesiana de efectos aleatorios para evaluar la eficacia comparativa de diferentes tratamientos. RESULTADOS: Se identificaron siete ensayos controlados aleatorios (5 CD, 2 UC) comparando tres biológicos y un inmunomodulador con placebo. En el CD, los fármacos anti-TNF redujeron significativamente la hospitalización [Odds ratio (OR) 0,46, intervalo de confianza del 95% (IC) 0,36-0,60] y cirugía (OR 0,23; IC del 95%: 0,13-0,42) en comparación con placebo. No se observó una reducción estadísticamente significativa con azatioprina o vedolizumab. La azatioprina fue inferior tanto al infliximab como al adalimumab en la prevención de la hospitalización relacionada con el CD (> 97,5% de probabilidad). Los fármacos anti-TNF redujeron significativamente la hospitalización (OR 0,48; IC del 95%: 0,29-0,80) y la cirugía (OR 0,67; IC del 95%: 0,46-0,97) en UC. No hubo diferencias estadísticamente significativas en las comparaciones en pares entre los tratamientos activos. CONCLUSIONES: En CD y UC, los fármacos anti-TNF son eficaces para reducir las probabilidades de hospitalización a la mitad y la cirugía en un 33-77%. La azatioprina y el vedolizumab no se asociaron con una mejora similar, pero las conclusiones robustas pueden estar limitadas debido a la escasez de ECA.
Nutrition is involved in several aspects of pediatric inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), ranging from disease etiology to induction and maintenance of disease. With regards to etiology, there are pediatric data, mainly from case-control studies, which suggest that some dietary habits (for example consumption of animal protein, fatty foods, high sugar intake) may predispose patients to IBD onset. As for disease treatment, exclusive enteral nutrition (EEN) is an extensively studied, well established, and valid approach to the remission of pediatric Crohn's disease (CD). Apart from EEN, several new nutritional approaches are emerging and have proved to be successful (specific carbohydrate diet and CD exclusion diet) but the available evidence is not strong enough to recommend this kind of intervention in clinical practice and new large experimental controlled studies are needed, especially in the pediatric population. Moreover, efforts are being made to identify foods with anti-inflammatory properties such as curcumin and long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids n-3, which can possibly be effective in maintenance of disease. The present systematic review aims at reviewing the scientific literature on all aspects of nutrition in pediatric IBD, including the most recent advances on nutritional therapy.
Crohn disease is an inflammatory bowel disease with intermittent symptoms relating to damage to the gastrointestinal tract. Compared with adult-onset Crohn disease, the childhood-onset form is more likely to be severe. Infliximab has shown efficacy in adult patients.
OBJECTIVE:
To examine the efficacy and safety of infliximab in pediatric Crohn disease, by means of a systematic review.
DATA SOURCES:
Three databases (MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) and regulatory documents were searched from inception to December 2017. Clinical trial registries, conference abstracts, and reference lists were searched to March 2018.
STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION:
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective cohort studies that compared infliximab with active control were included in the analysis. Two reviewers independently performed screening, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. The primary outcomes were induction and maintenance of endoscopic remission and severe adverse effects.
DATA SYNTHESIS:
Three eligible RCTs comparing different dose regimens, 16 prospective cohort studies comparing infliximab with other therapies (adalimumab, exclusive enteral nutrition, or standard of care), and 3 prospective cohort studies comparing different infliximab regimens were identified. Meta-analysis of the RCTs showed no significant difference between infliximab every 8 weeks compared with longer intervals for maintenance of clinical remission (risk ratio [RR] 1.76, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.98-3.19). Meta-analyses of the prospective cohort studies showed no significant differences between infliximab and adalimumab for maintenance of endoscopic remission (RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.60-1.92), between infliximab and exclusive enteral nutrition for induction of clinical remission (RR 1.09, 95% CI 0.82-1.45), or between infliximab and standard of care for maintenance of clinical remission at 6 and 12 months (RR 1.12, 95% CI 0.58-2.17, and RR 1.24, 95% CI 0.84-1.84, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS:
Current evidence suggested comparable efficacy for infliximab and other therapies; however, the available literature was limited by risk of bias and small sample size. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm the efficacy and safety of this drug in pediatric Crohn disease.
