FREEDOMS II
12 Documentos
Cerrar
12 Referencias ( articles) loading Revertir Estudificar

Estudio primario

No clasificado

Autores Novartis
Registro de estudios clinicaltrials.gov
Año 2006
Cargando información sobre las referencias
This study assessed the safety, tolerability and efficacy of two doses of oral fingolimod compared to placebo on efficacy parameters in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS).

Estudio primario

No clasificado

Revista Abstract meeting of the 28th Congress of the European Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis
Año 2012
Cargando información sobre las referencias

Estudio primario

No clasificado

Revista 64th AAN Annual Meeting; April 21–28, 2012; New Orleans, Lousiana.
Año 2012
Cargando información sobre las referencias
OBJETIVOS: Evaluar la eficacia y seguridad de fingolimod 0,5 mg frente a placebo en pacientes con EMRR. ANTECEDENTES: 0,5 mg de fingolimod, una vez al día, es el primer tratamiento oral aprobado en muchos países de EM recidivante. MÉTODOS: 1.083 pacientes con EMRR fueron asignados al azar a 0,5 mg de fingolimod, 1,25 mg, o placebo (1: 1: 1). El estudio incluyó a 95% de los pacientes en los EE.UU.. 75% de los pacientes habían sido sometidos a un tratamiento previo con otros TME. Tasa anual de recaídas (ARR) en el mes (M) 24 fue la variable principal. Los objetivos secundarios incluyeron el cambio de volumen cerebral por ciento (PBVC) desde el inicio y la hora a 3-M confirma la progresión de la discapacidad. RESULTADOS: En M24, 0,5 mg fingolimod redujeron significativamente ARR por 48% vs. placebo (0,21 vs. 0,40; pConclusions: Los resultados confirman los efectos beneficiosos de fingolimod en parámetros clínicos y de resonancia magnética incluyendo atrofia cerebral. Resultados de seguridad fueron consistentes con estudios previos. Estudio apoyado por: El estudio fue financiado por Novartis Pharma AG, Basilea, Suiza.

Estudio primario

No clasificado

Revista
Año 2012
Cargando información sobre las referencias

Estudio primario

No clasificado

Revista
Año 2012
Cargando información sobre las referencias

Estudio primario

No clasificado

Revista
Año 2013
Cargando información sobre las referencias

Estudio primario

No clasificado

Revista Abtract meeting of The European Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis (ECTRIMS)
Año 2013
Cargando información sobre las referencias

Estudio primario

No clasificado

Revista Abstract meeting of the 65th American Academy of Neurology Annual Meeting
Año 2013
Cargando información sobre las referencias

Estudio primario

No clasificado

Revista Neurology
Año 2013
Cargando información sobre las referencias

Estudio primario

No clasificado

Revista Journal of neuro-ophthalmology : the official journal of the North American Neuro-Ophthalmology Society
Año 2013
Cargando información sobre las referencias
BACKGROUND: Patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) demonstrate thinning of peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) and decreased macular volume as measured by optical coherence tomography (OCT). To our knowledge, there are no previous reports from a large MS OCT database with strict quality control measures that quantitate RNFL and macula in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. METHODS: The University of California Davis OCT Reading Center gathered OCT data at baseline as part of the North American phase 3 trial of fingolimod (Gilenya). Average RNFL thickness (RNFLT) and macular volume (TMV) were measured using time domain OCT (TD-OCT). RNFL quadrants, clock hours, and macular subfields were included. With strict quality control and accounting for signal strength differences, scans were categorized as "reduced" or "not reduced" for each field, based on being less than 5th percentile for age-matched controls derived from the normative database in the scanner software. Patients were deemed "abnormal" if at least 1 eye had reduced values for a given parameter. Patients with abnormalities in corresponding RNFL and macular subfields were compared by cross-tabulation. RESULTS: The TD-OCT data were prospectively collected from 939 of the 1,083 trial patients, 712 of whom met all final quality and data inclusion criteria. Of the final cohort, 242 (34.0%) demonstrated reduced (less than 5th percentile) average RNFLT in at least 1 eye. One hundred seventy-eight (25.0%) patients had reduced TMV. One hundred twenty-eight (18.0%) demonstrated both reduced TMV and RNFLT in the same eye, whereas 42 (5.8%) had reduced TMV and RNFLT in both eyes. Of the 242 patients with reduced average RNFL thickness, 128 (52.9%) also had reduced TMV. Fifty patients had reduced TMV in the absence of reduced RNFLT in at least 1 eye, a cohort prevalence of 7.0%. Quadrant and subfield analysis showed a predominance of temporal and inferior RNFL thinning, with inferior macular thinning corresponding best to RNFL thinning. CONCLUSION: RNFL and macular thinning/volume loss is common at baseline in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, as measured by TD-OCT. When the RNFL is thin, the macular volume is reduced in more than half of the patients. There is a population of reduced TMV without any reduction in RNFLT. Documenting the prevalence and distribution of these structural abnormalities supports recent reports and suggests new retinal areas to probe for functional vision changes in MS. Copyright © 2013 North American Neuro-Ophthalmology Society.

Estudio primario

No clasificado

Revista Abstract meeting of the 66th American Academy of Neurology Annual Meeting
Año 2014
Cargando información sobre las referencias

Estudio primario

No clasificado

Revista The Lancet. Neurology
Año 2014
Cargando información sobre las referencias
BACKGROUND: Fingolimod has shown reductions in clinical and MRI disease activity in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. We further assessed the efficacy and safety of fingolimod in such patients. METHODS: We did this placebo-controlled, double-blind phase 3 study predominantly in the USA (101 of 117 centres). Using a computer-generated sequence, we randomly allocated eligible patients-those aged 18-55 years with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis-to receive fingolimod 0·5 mg, fingolimod 1·25 mg, or placebo orally once daily (1:1:1; stratified by study centre). On Nov 12, 2009, all patients assigned to fingolimod 1·25 mg were switched to the 0·5 mg dose in a blinded manner after a review of data from other phase 3 trials and recommendation from the data and safety monitoring board, but were analysed as being in the 1·25 mg group in the primary outcome analysis. Our primary endpoint was annualised relapse rate at month 24, analysed by intention to treat. Secondary endpoints included percentage brain volume change (PBVC) from baseline and time-to-disability-progression confirmed at 3 months. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrilals.gov, number NCT00355134. FINDINGS: Between June 30, 2006, and March 4, 2009, we enrolled and randomly allocated 1083 patients: 370 to fingolimod 1·25 mg, 358 to fingolimod 0·5 mg, and 355 to placebo. Mean annualised relapse rate was 0·40 (95% CI 0·34-0·48) in patients given placebo and 0·21 (0·17-0·25) in patients given fingolimod 0·5 mg: rate ratio 0·52 (95% CI 0·40-0·66; p<0·0001), corresponding to a reduction of 48% with fingolimod 0·5 mg versus placebo. Mean PBVC was -0·86 (SD 1·22) for fingolimod 0·5 mg versus -1·28 (1·50) for placebo (treatment difference -0·41, 95% CI -0·62 to -0·20; p=0·0002). We recorded no statistically significant between-group difference in confirmed disability progression (hazard rate 0·83 with fingolimod 0·5 mg vs placebo; 95% CI 0·61-1·12; p=0·227). Fingolimod 0·5 mg caused more of the following adverse events versus placebo: lymphopenia (27 [8%] patients vs 0 patients), increased alanine aminotransferase (29 [8%] vs six [2%]), herpes zoster infection (nine [3%] vs three [1%]), hypertension (32 [9%] vs 11 [3%]), first-dose bradycardia (five [1%] vs one [<0·5%]), and first-degree atrioventricular block (17 [5%] vs seven [2%]). 53 (15%) of 358 patients given fingolimod 0·5 mg and 45 (13%) of 355 patients given placebo had serious adverse events over 24 months, which included basal-cell carcinoma (ten [3%] patients vs two [1%] patients), macular oedema (three [1%] vs two [1%]), infections (11 [3%] vs four [1%]), and neoplasms (13 [4%] vs eight [2%]). INTERPRETATION: Our findings expand knowledge of the safety profile of fingolimod and strengthen evidence for its beneficial effects on relapse rates in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. We saw no effect of fingolimod on disability progression. Our findings substantiate the beneficial profile of fingolimod as a disease-modifying agent in the management of patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. FUNDING: Novartis Pharma AG.