Estudios primarios incluidos en esta revisión sistemática

loading
11 articles (11 Referencias) Revertir Estudificar

Estudio primario

No clasificado

Early good response to therapy in RA patients predicts a better long-term clinical course and less radiographic joint damage

Revista Arthritis Rheum
Año 2008

Este artículo está incluido en 1 Revisión sistemática Revisiones sistemáticas (1 referencia)

Cargando información sobre las referencias

Estudio primario

No clasificado

Comparison of the clinical efficacy and safety of subcutaneous versus oral administration of methotrexate in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: results of a six-month, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, controlled, phase IV trial.

Revista Arthritis and rheumatism
Año 2008
Enlaces Pubmed DOI

Este artículo está incluido en 6 Revisiones sistemáticas Revisiones sistemáticas (6 referencias) 2 Síntesis amplias Síntesis amplias (2 referencias)

Cargando información sobre las referencias
OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous (SC) versus oral administration of methotrexate (MTX) in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: MTX-naive patients with active RA (Disease Activity Score in 28 joints >or= 4) were eligible for the study if they had not previously taken biologic agents and had not taken disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs for 2 weeks prior to randomization. Patients were randomly assigned to receive 15 mg/week of MTX either orally (2 7.5-mg tablets plus a dummy prefilled syringe; n=187 patients) or SC (prefilled syringe containing 10 mg/ml plus 2 dummy tablets; n=188 patients) for 24 weeks. At week 16, patients who did not meet the American College of Rheumatology criteria for 20% improvement (ACR20) were switched from 15 mg of oral MTX to 15 mg of SC MTX and from 15 mg of SC MTX to 20 mg of SC MTX for the remaining 8 weeks, still in a blinded manner. The primary outcome was an ACR20 response at 24 weeks. RESULTS: At week 24, significantly more patients treated with SC MTX than with oral MTX showed ACR20 (78% versus 70%) and ACR70 (41% versus 33%) responses. Patients with a disease duration >or= 12 months had even higher ACR20 response rates (89% for SC administration and 63% for oral). In 52 of the ACR20 nonresponders (14%), treatment was switched at week 16. Changing from oral to SC MTX and from 15 mg to 20 mg of SC MTX resulted in 30% and 23% ACR20 response rates, respectively, in these patients. MTX was well tolerated. The rate of adverse events was similar in all groups. CONCLUSION: This 6-month prospective, randomized, controlled trial is the first to examine oral versus SC administration of MTX. We found that SC administration was significantly more effective than oral administration of the same MTX dosage. There was no difference in tolerability.

Estudio primario

No clasificado

Methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis, starting dose and dose escalation regimens

Autores Jassim IAH , Al-Allaf A , Newton P
Revista Ann Rheum Dis
Año 2007

Este artículo está incluido en 1 Revisión sistemática Revisiones sistemáticas (1 referencia) 1 Síntesis amplia Síntesis amplias (1 referencia)

Cargando información sobre las referencias

Hilo de publicación

CAMERA 1 (Computer Assisted Management in Early Rheumatoid Arthritis)

Este hilo de publicación incluye 4 referencias

Estudio primario

No clasificado

Drug survival and reasons for discontinuation of intramuscular methotrexate: a study of 212 consecutive patients switching from oral methotrexate.

Revista Scandinavian journal of rheumatology
Año 2006
Enlaces Pubmed DOI

Este artículo está incluido en 1 Revisión sistemática Revisiones sistemáticas (1 referencia)

Cargando información sobre las referencias
OBJECTIVES: To assess the drug survival and reasons for discontinuation of intramuscular methotrexate (imMTX) in rheumatological patients who had switched to imMTX from oral methotrexate (oMTX). METHODS: Data from 212 consecutive patients who switched from oMTX to imMTX therapy at our outpatient clinic between April 1997 and January 2004 were collected retrospectively through survey of case records. Data included reason for discontinuation of oMTX, disease activity parameters, duration of imMTX therapy, and, in patients who withdrew, the reason for discontinuation of imMTX. RESULTS: The main reasons for switching from oMTX to imMTX were lack of efficacy (66%) and adverse events (28%). After 6 months, 114 patients (54%) were still receiving imMTX therapy, and their median serum C-reactive protein (CRP) and the percentage of patients who had received glucocorticoids during the previous 6 weeks had decreased (p<0.001). The median survival of imMTX therapy was 7.5 months (interquartile range 3-17). Twenty per cent of the patients received imMTX for more than 24 months. Of the 212 patients, 41% and 9% stopped imMTX therapy because of lack of efficacy and adverse events, respectively. Of the patients who had stopped oMTX because of adverse events, 22% also withdrew from imMTX because of adverse events. CONCLUSION: Half of the patients benefited from switching from oral to intramuscular methotrexate for at least 6 months, but only a minority adhered to the treatment for years. Lack of efficacy was the most frequent reason for discontinuation, while adverse events were rare.

Estudio primario

No clasificado

Better efficacy of methotrexate given by intramuscular injection than orally in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Autores Wegrzyn J , Adeleine P , Miossec P
Revista Annals of the rheumatic diseases
Año 2004
Enlaces Pubmed DOI PubMed Central

Este artículo está incluido en 1 Revisión sistemática Revisiones sistemáticas (1 referencia) 1 Síntesis amplia Síntesis amplias (1 referencia)

Cargando información sobre las referencias
OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical efficacy of methotrexate and tolerance to the drug in patients with rheumatoid arthritis who were switched from intramuscular to oral administration because of a shortage of the intramuscular preparation. METHODS: 143 patients were switched from intramuscular to oral methotrexate. Of these, 47 were switched back to the intramuscular form. A multiple choice questionnaire was sent by mail to evaluate clinical and biological criteria of efficacy and tolerance. RESULTS: When methotrexate was first switched from intramuscular to oral administration, increased disease activity, exacerbation of morning pain and hand stiffness, duration of morning stiffness, increased joint pain, and increased joint swelling were observed. There was a greater frequency of gastrointestinal symptoms, but without a significant increase in liver abnormalities. When intramuscular methotrexate became available again, 47 of the 143 patients were switched back and were followed for at least three months. On average, disease manifestations were improved and side effects reduced by the switch. CONCLUSIONS: Methotrexate given intramuscularly had improved clinical efficacy with fewer side effects than given orally. Intramuscular methotrexate administration should be considered when rheumatoid arthritis remains active in spite of high dose oral methotrexate.

Estudio primario

No clasificado

Dose escalation of parenteral methotrexate in active rheumatoid arthritis that has been unresponsive to conventional doses of methotrexate: a randomized, controlled trial.

Revista Arthritis and rheumatism
Año 2004
Enlaces Pubmed DOI

Este artículo está incluido en 2 Revisiones sistemáticas Revisiones sistemáticas (2 referencias) 1 Síntesis amplia Síntesis amplias (1 referencia)

Cargando información sobre las referencias
OBJECTIVE: To examine whether dose escalation of intramuscular (IM) methotrexate (MTX) up to 45 mg/week improves disease control in patients who have active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) despite receiving conventional doses (15 mg/week) of IM MTX, and to obtain preliminary data on patient tolerability and adverse effects of higher doses of IM MTX. METHODS: Patients >18 years of age who had active RA, defined as a European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28) of >3.2, and who had received 15-20 mg/week of oral MTX for at least 2 months were switched (week 0) to 15 mg/week of IM MTX for 6 weeks. Patients whose DAS28 remained >3.2 at both week 4 and week 6 were randomized, in a double-blind manner, either to continue to receive 15 mg/week IM MTX with monthly placebo escalation or to receive escalating doses of IM MTX monthly up to 45 mg/week. The dose of MTX or placebo was escalated every 4 weeks if the DAS28 was >2.5. Safety assessments and determination of the DAS28 were performed every 2 weeks and monthly, respectively. Disease activity parameters from the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) core disease activity set and health status as recorded on the Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 12 were determined at baseline (week 0) and final assessment (week 22). The primary outcome was the percentage of patients in each group achieving a target DAS28 of <3.2. Secondary outcomes comprised the percentage of patients whose DAS28 improved by >1.2, the percentage of patients achieving a 20% improvement in the ACR core disease activity measures (ACR20), and the percentage of patients achieving a good response, a moderate response, or no response in accordance with the EULAR response criteria. RESULTS: Sixty-four patients were eligible for entry and were switched from oral MTX to 15 mg/week IM MTX. At baseline, the mean +/- SD DAS28 was 5.6 +/- 0.88; after 6 weeks of IM MTX, the DAS28 had improved by a mean of 0.42 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.15-0.69). At 6 weeks, 54 patients still had a DAS28 of >3.2 and were therefore eligible for randomization. By 22 weeks, 1 patient (3.7%) in each group achieved the primary outcome of a DAS28 <3.2 (95% CI for the difference between the groups -15% to +15%). Five patients (18.5%) in each group showed an improvement of >1.2 in the DAS28 (95% CI for the difference between the groups -18% to +18%). One patient (3.7%) in each group achieved an ACR20 response, but none achieved a good response as defined by the EULAR response criteria. One patient in each group had a serious adverse reaction; minor adverse reactions were more frequently reported in the dose escalation group. CONCLUSION: Switching from oral to parenteral MTX 15 mg/week results in a minor improvement in disease control. For patients with active RA receiving 15 mg/week IM MTX, increasing the dose up to 45 mg/week does not improve disease control. Higher doses of IM MTX were generally well tolerated and not associated with an increase in serious adverse reactions to the drug.

Estudio primario

No clasificado

Parenteral methotrexate should be given before biological therapy.

Revista Rheumatology (Oxford, England)
Año 2003
Enlaces Pubmed DOI

Este artículo está incluido en 1 Revisión sistemática Revisiones sistemáticas (1 referencia) 1 Síntesis amplia Síntesis amplias (1 referencia)

Cargando información sobre las referencias

Estudio primario

No clasificado

Tolerability of methotrexate starting with 15 or 25 mg/week for rheumatoid arthritis.

Revista Rheumatology international
Año 1994
Enlaces Pubmed DOI

Este artículo está incluido en 2 Revisiones sistemáticas Revisiones sistemáticas (2 referencias) 1 Síntesis amplia Síntesis amplias (1 referencia)

Cargando información sobre las referencias
The objective of the present study was to assess the rate of side-effects and dose-limiting toxicity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) receiving methotrexate (MTX) at an initial dose of 15 or 25 mg/week. One hundred and eighty-five patients with active RA were enrolled into a prospective non-blind trial over 12 months and randomized to start at a dose of 15 mg/week with subsequent increases if necessary (group A) or 25 mg/week with subsequent dose reductions according to effect (group B). With 168 patients eligible for evaluation 74% of patient in group A and 73% of patients in group B were on MTX after 12 months. Withdrawal due to side-effects amounted to 16% of patients in group A and 18% in group B, and decreases in dose due to side-effects amounted to 10% in group A and 9% in group B. The higher dose of MTX elicited a significantly higher rate of gastrointestinal side-effects (28% versus 17%, P < 0.05) and a tendency towards a higher rate of liver enzyme elevations (47% versus 39%). The frequencies of other side-effects did not differ significantly between the groups. We concluded that starting MTX treatment at a dose of 25 mg/week was associated with a higher rate of minor but not major toxicity as compared with 15 mg/week. With this profile of tolerability it is possible to examine the therapeutic potential of MTX doses exceeding 15 mg/week.

Hilo de publicación

Furst et al [provisional name] (Methotrexate for rheumatoid arthritis [provisional name])

Este hilo de publicación incluye 2 referencias