Broad syntheses related to this topic

loading
4 References (4 articles) loading Revert Studify

Broad synthesis / Guideline

Unclassified

Journal Chest
Year 2016
BACKGROUND: We update recommendations on 12 topics that were in the 9th edition of these guidelines, and address 3 new topics. METHODS: We generate strong (Grade 1) and weak (Grade 2) recommendations based on high- (Grade A), moderate- (Grade B), and low- (Grade C) quality evidence. RESULTS: For VTE and no cancer, as long-term anticoagulant therapy, we suggest dabigatran (Grade 2B), rivaroxaban (Grade 2B), apixaban (Grade 2B), or edoxaban (Grade 2B) over vitamin K antagonist (VKA) therapy, and suggest VKA therapy over low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH; Grade 2C). For VTE and cancer, we suggest LMWH over VKA (Grade 2B), dabigatran (Grade 2C), rivaroxaban (Grade 2C), apixaban (Grade 2C), or edoxaban (Grade 2C). We have not changed recommendations for who should stop anticoagulation at 3 months or receive extended therapy. For VTE treated with anticoagulants, we recommend against an inferior vena cava filter (Grade 1B). For DVT, we suggest not using compression stockings routinely to prevent PTS (Grade 2B). For subsegmental pulmonary embolism and no proximal DVT, we suggest clinical surveillance over anticoagulation with a low risk of recurrent VTE (Grade 2C), and anticoagulation over clinical surveillance with a high risk (Grade 2C). We suggest thrombolytic therapy for pulmonary embolism with hypotension (Grade 2B), and systemic therapy over catheter-directed thrombolysis (Grade 2C). For recurrent VTE on a non-LMWH anticoagulant, we suggest LMWH (Grade 2C); for recurrent VTE on LMWH, we suggest increasing the LMWH dose (Grade 2C). CONCLUSIONS: Of 54 recommendations included in the 30 statements, 20 were strong and none was based on high-quality evidence, highlighting the need for further research.

Broad synthesis / Living FRISBEE

Unclassified

Auteurs Valenzuela A , Aizman A
Journal Medwave
Year 2015
Idiopathic thromboembolic disease presents a high risk of recurrence. There is controversy about the effects of aspirin in reducing this risk after the completion of anticoagulant treatment. Searching in Epistemonikos database, which screens 30 databases, we identified four systematic reviews that together include two randomized trials. We combined the evidence using meta-analysis and generated a summary of findings table following the GRADE approach. We concluded that aspirin administered after having completed anticoagulation reduces the risk of recurrence, probably without importantly increasing the risk of hemorrhage.

Broad synthesis

Unclassified

Journal Clinical evidence
Year 2011
INTRODUCTION: Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism may occur in almost 2 in 1000 people each year, with up to 25% of those having a recurrence. Around 5% to 15% of people with untreated DVT may die from pulmonary embolism. Risk factors for DVT include immobility, surgery (particularly orthopaedic), malignancy, pregnancy, older age, and inherited or acquired prothrombotic clotting disorders. METHODS AND OUTCOMES: We conducted a systematic review and aimed to answer the following clinical questions: What are the effects of treatments for proximal DVT? What are the effects of treatments for isolated calf DVT? What are the effects of treatments for pulmonary embolism? What are the effects of interventions on oral anticoagulation management in people with thromboembolism? We searched: Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and other important databases up to June 2010 (Clinical Evidence reviews are updated periodically; please check our website for the most up-to-date version of this review). We included harms alerts from relevant organisations such as the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA). RESULTS: We found 45 systematic reviews, RCTs, or observational studies that met our inclusion criteria. We performed a GRADE evaluation of the quality of evidence for interventions. CONCLUSIONS: In this systematic review we present information relating to the effectiveness and safety of the following interventions: anticoagulation; compression stockings; low molecular weight heparin (short and long term, once or twice daily, and home treatment); oral anticoagulants (short and long term, high intensity, abrupt discontinuation, and computerised decision support); prolonged duration of anticoagulation; thrombolysis; vena cava filters; and warfarin.

Broad synthesis

Unclassified

Auteurs Meijer K , Schulman S
Journal Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH
Year 2009
CONTEXTE: La décision d'arrêter l'anticoagulation après un épisode de thrombo-embolie veineuse (TEV) dépend du risque de récidive. Un certain nombre de facteurs de risque abordés récemment qui ne sont pas couramment utilisées en pratique clinique pourrait être utile pour l'identification des patients présentant un faible risque de récidive. OBJECTIFS: L'objectif de cette étude était de déterminer la valeur prédictive négative et le rapport de vraisemblance de l'absence de chacun de ces facteurs chez les patients ayant un ETEV. Les patients et méthodes: Nous avons effectué une revue systématique de la littérature, ou calculées des valeurs prédictives négatives et rapports de vraisemblance, et résume les données probantes disponibles. RÉSULTATS: Un négatif de D-dimères résultat, non-élevée au niveau de facteur VIII et de génération de thrombine non-élevée après l'arrêt du traitement anticoagulant, le sexe féminin et l'emplacement distale peut être utile pour déterminer un faible risque de récidive chez les patients ayant un ETEV. Chacune de ces facteurs est individuellement associée à une valeur prédictive négative de la survie sans récidive dans les 2-3 prochaines années d'environ 90% (avec un risque à priori d'environ 85%), avec les rapports de vraisemblance négatifs entre 0,8 et 0,5. Certains des facteurs de risque pour l'événement VTE (FV Leiden et la mutation de prothrombine) ne sont pas du tout utile pour la prédiction de la non-récurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Aucun des facteurs de risque que nous avons identifiés est assez fort sur son propre pour guider le traitement. Combinaisons de facteurs de risque pourrait être plus utile, mais des données supplémentaires sur l'indépendance de ces facteurs sont nécessaires avant une règle de prédiction peuvent être conçus.