Primary studies included in this systematic review

loading
12 articles (12 References) loading Revert Studify

Primary study

Unclassified

期刊 Respirology (Carlton, Vic.)
Year 2007
Loading references information
背景与目的:吸入糖皮质激素被推荐为第一线治疗哮喘的管理,但副作用可能限制其使用。环索奈德,一种新型的亲药物吸入糖皮质激素,发挥强有力的和长期的局部抗炎在肺部的影响,被认为有一个更好的安全性和耐受性。本研究的目的是评估有轻度到中度哮喘患者在成年患者的疗效和安全环索奈德。方法:一项安慰剂对照,多中心,随机,双盲,平行组研究。在4周的基线期,患者均给予丙酸倍氯米松400微克/天,在氟氯化碳配方。基线期后,311例患者给予每日一次100,200或400微克环索奈德或安慰剂8周的治疗期间不使用间隔。主要效果变数是晨间PEF。结果:在晨间PEF的变化(最小二乘的意思),在研究结束时分别为4.23升/分钟(P <0.001),在100微克组,3.75升/分钟(P <0.001),在200微克组 - 0.40升/分钟400微克组(P <0.01),-24.95升/分钟,安慰剂组相比。在环索奈德组的PEF保持在同一水平作为基准期。安慰剂组和安全有关的环索奈德组之间没有大的差异,观察。结论:在100,200或400微克的剂量每日一次的环索奈德管理被证明是有效成年患者有轻度到中度哮喘。环索奈德被认为具有良好的安全性和耐受性良好。

Primary study

Unclassified

期刊 Respirology (Carlton, Vic.)
Year 2007
Loading references information
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Inhaled corticosteroids are recognized as first-line therapy in the management of asthma; however, their use may be limited by systemic and local side-effects. Ciclesonide, a novel pro-drug inhaled corticosteroid, is activated in the lungs and is expected to have less systemic and local side-effects. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of ciclesonide in hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) compared with beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) in a chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) formulation in adult patients with moderate to severe asthma. METHODS: This was a multicentre, randomized, open-label, parallel-group comparative study. The patients were given 800 microg/day of CFC-BDP in the four-week baseline period. After the baseline period, 319 patients were randomly allocated into three groups which, respectively, received HFA-ciclesonide 400 microg/day (without a spacer), HFA-ciclesonide 800 microg/day (without spacer) and CFC-BDP 800 microg/day (with spacer) for the eight-week treatment period. The primary efficacy variable was morning PEF. RESULTS: The morning PEF increased by 16.02 L/min in the 400 microg HFA-ciclesonide group, 23.98 L/min in the 800 microg HFA-ciclesonide group and 5.91 L/min in the 800 microg CFC-BDP group. Better outcomes were achieved by the use of 800 microg/day of HFA-ciclesonide compared with 800 microg/day of CFC-BDP (P = 0.001). There was no difference in adverse events between the groups. CONCLUSION: In adult patients with moderate to severe asthma, 800 microg/day of HFA-ciclesonide was significantly more effective than 800 microg/day of CFC-BDP. Ciclesonide at doses of 400 microg/day and 800 microg/day was safe and well tolerated.

Primary study

Unclassified

期刊 The Journal of asthma : official journal of the Association for the Care of Asthma
Year 2007
Loading references information
这12周,双盲,平行组研究,比较每日一次的环索奈德,年龄12-75年持续性哮喘患者每日两次卡松的疗效和安全性。患者被随机分配到每日一次的环索奈德80微克(N = 278)或160微克(N = 271),或每天两次替卡松88微克(N = 259)(所有前执行器)。从基线显着改善被视为在所有三个治疗用力呼气量在1秒,哮喘症状评分和抢救用药组(P <0.0001)。哮喘发作率分别为低(每个环索奈德组,N = 2;氟替卡松组,n = 1)。不良事件报告显示良好的耐受性。一旦每天的环索奈德80微克或160微克显示可比的疗效和耐受性,每日两次替卡松88微克,持续性哮喘。

Primary study

Unclassified

期刊 Chest
Year 2006
Loading references information
研究目的:口服皮质类固醇(OCS),可伴有全身性不良事件(AE),这可以减少更换OCS与吸入糖皮质激素(ICS)。环索奈德,一个新的ICS,OCS使用,以减少严重的,持续性哮喘患者的潜力进行了评估,本研究。 设计:一项III期,12周,国际化,多中心,双盲,安慰剂对照,平行组研究。 患者:严重的,持续的,口服类固醇(强的松)依赖型哮喘的成人和青少年患者(>或= 12岁,N = 141)。 干预:患者随机接受环索奈德(640杯/ d或1280微克/天[前执行器)的出价或安慰剂治疗12周。每周评估确定资格泼尼松剂量减少,根据事先确定的标准。 方法和结果:强的松的剂量显着减少了47%和63%的组中接受640微克/天,环索奈德,环索奈德,1280微克/天,分别比增加了4%,而安慰剂组(均P <或= 0.0003),在第12周。第12周,强的松被中断的环索奈德治疗组的患者约30%,与11%,而安慰剂组患者(P均<或= 0.04)。中的环索奈德治疗组与安慰剂组(P <0.03),FEV1在第12周显着改善。局部和全身不良事件的发生,各治疗组之间的相媲美。 结论:研究结果表明,环索奈德显着地减少了对OCS严重的,持续性哮喘的患者,同时维持哮喘控制。

Primary study

Unclassified

期刊 Respiratory medicine
Year 2006
Loading references information
环索奈德是一种新型的,激活肺,每日一次疗效和强有力的抗炎活性与吸入皮质类固醇。这项研究的目的是比较呼出的一氧化氮(FENO),肺功能,轻度过敏性哮喘患者的临床评价中使用的其他参数的环索奈德和丙酸氟替卡松的效果。研究表明,环索奈德(在每日剂量为80或160微克)诱导的FENO与氟替卡松(100微克,每日两次)相比下降更快,更强。FENO水平最高降幅环索奈德,治疗2周后观察治疗的患者两组。氟替卡松治疗的患者组中,这个最大的效果,没有观察到8周。在所有的研究组在肺功能指标的改善观察。群体之间的统计差异没有被发现,然而,有一个在接收160微克的环索奈德组向着更高的增长趋势。各组研究,我们观察到临床改善(哮喘症状和急救药品的消费量减少),但有这些群体之间没有显着差异。我们的研究结果表明,环索奈德,氟替卡松相比,具有较强的抗炎轻度过敏性哮喘患者的活动。

Primary study

Unclassified

期刊 Allergy
Year 2006
Loading references information
BACKGROUND: Ciclesonide exhibits clinical efficacy at 160 microg (ex-actuator) once daily but the anti-inflammatory effects at this dose are not known. We wished to know whether 4 weeks therapy with ciclesonide pMDI 160 microg once daily in the morning exhibited significant anti-inflammatory effects. METHODS: Seventeen patients with mild persistent asthma (FEV(1) 3.35 l) were recruited into a double-blind placebo-controlled randomized crossover study. Measurements were made after ciclesonide and placebo treatment as well as after run-in and washout periods, for adenosine monophosphate (AMP) bronchial challenge (primary variable), exhaled nitric oxide (NO) and induced sputum (in a subgroup). RESULTS: The mean (SEM) AMP bronchial challenge PC(20) following ciclesonide (140 (63) mg/ml) was significantly (P < 0.001) increased compared with placebo (17 (8) mg/ml), run-in (13 (5) mg/ml) and washout (9 (3) mg/ml) periods. This amounted to an eightfold (CI: 5.3-12.0) for ciclesonide vs placebo. Likewise, there were significant improvements in exhaled NO levels and a significant reduction in induced sputum eosinophil cell counts. CONCLUSION: We have shown that inhaled ciclesonide given at 160 microg once daily in the morning exhibits significant anti-inflammatory effects that are in keeping with the previously described clinical effects.

Primary study

Unclassified

期刊 Clinical therapeutics
Year 2006
Loading references information
摘要:背景:式Ciclesonide是一个肺激活的吸入式皮质类固醇(ICS)的即已所示的在先前的的安慰剂-受控和的比较的在与持续性哮喘的的患者的研究的新的疗效。它是很重要的到与现有的ICSS进行比较。的新的治疗方法,,以获取关于他们的的的疗效和的耐受性的的相对的数据。关闭下载PDF阅读器目的本的研究相比,的的疗效和耐受性作者:环索奈德与布地奈德出价的在与哮喘的患者量子点。方法:这12个-星期的的,随机的的的研究被进行的在横跨欧洲的62的的研究地盘,。年龄介乎与这主要是轻度至中度哮喘患者的12岁至75岁的的男性和女性患者的被纳入。本研究目的是双与尊重到的环索奈德剂量和为布地奈德的开放的标签的的盲目,正如布地奈德placebofor是不可用的的。例患者随机分配给收到吸入环索奈德80或320微克量子点(上午)或布地奈德200为12个星期的微克出价。的疗效和的耐受性评估的被执行的在个星期0(基线),4,8,和12个。的首要的年底点是从基线的在被迫在12周时的呼气容积在1个第二个(,第一秒吐气量)中中的的变化。次要结束点分别为从基线在早晨呼气流量峰值中(,PEF)的的变化,哮喘症状分数,和救援药物的使用。的耐受性进行了评估在整个由作者:标准的实验室变量(血液学和生物化学)的监测的的的研究;体格检查,其中包括生命体征;各的不良事件(AES)的汇报;和24-小时的的尿皮质醇,作为一个作者:下丘脑 - 垂体-肾上腺皮质功能-轴的措施,的函数。结果:五国一百五十-四个病人分别为随机(301的男子,253妇女;的平均年龄,41.3年来;环索奈德80微克量子点的的,182的的的患者;环索奈德320微克量子点,195;布地奈德200微克BID,有177)。人口统计的和基线的的临床的的特点,其中包括年龄,性别,重量,及(第一秒吐气量)是之间的3组的的类似的。与基线值相比,一周-12第一秒吐气量(最小二乘法是什么意思[水流职事站] [扫描电镜]一个,0.267 [0.035],0.256 [0​​.033],和0.355 [0.034] L时,分别为;所有,,P <0.001)和晨间PEF器(LSM [扫描电镜]三角洲+12 [5]为+17 [4],和+21 [4] L / min的,分别为;所有,,P <或= 0.008)被显着与环索奈德80改善的,和320微克QD和布地奈德200微克BID。在12周时,环索奈德被发现,到是非劣性的到与方面的布地奈德,,以意味着从基线的变化在式(第一秒吐气量)(意图到对待[ITT公司]:97.5%为环索奈德80微克量子点相较布地奈德200微克出价CI,-0.192到0.015而;为环索奈德320微克量子点相较布地奈德200微克出价97.5 CI为,-0.200到0.001)和晨间PEF(ITT. 97.5%CI为环索奈德80微克量子点相较布地奈德200微克出价,-22至5; 97.5%为环索奈德320微克的的CI QD相较布地奈德200微克出价,-17到10)。类似的调查结果被视为在的的per-protocol的人口中。一周-12每日的,白天,和夜间的的哮喘症状的分数和救援药物的使用被显着下跌从在的所有3个治疗组中的基线(所有,,P <0.001)。AES的的的患病率分别为横跨所有3个治疗组的的是类似的的。-12周是什么意思尿皮质醇排泄量有统计学类似的与既环索奈德剂量(三角洲,-0.54和+0.16 nmol /毫摩尔与环索奈德80和320微克的量子点的肌酐,分别为)至基线水平的,,,但被显着从与布地奈德(三角洲,的的基线中减少的 - 1.42 nmol /毫摩尔肌酐;:P <0.05)JOURNAL。结论:本在与主要是轻度至中度的哮喘的患者中的研究中该的研究结果表明,环索奈德80和320微克的量子点是相似的,到布地奈德200微克BID,在改善肺函数,控制哮喘症状的的,和减少的为抢险救援药物的使用的的的必要性的。与布地奈德不同的是,环索奈德被不相关联的在这些患者中具有显着的泌尿皮质醇抑制的。

Primary study

Unclassified

期刊 The Journal of pediatrics
Year 2006
Loading references information
目的:比较疗效和每日一次吸入环索奈德40杯的安全(CIC40),80杯(CIC80),以及160杯(CIC160)与安慰剂的儿童与所有的严重性持续性哮喘。 研究设计:总体而言,1031儿童年龄4至11岁的患者随机分为2个相同的双盲,安慰剂对照,平行组研究由一个的磨合阶段,随后12周的治疗。这两项研究都设计为允许一个预先规定的综合分析。主要结果变量是变化用力呼气量在1秒(FEV(1))%的预测基线和研究结束时之间;治疗比较使用协方差分析评估。其他终点包括哮喘症状评分,每日沙丁胺醇使用和安全,包括下丘脑 - 垂体 - 肾上腺轴(HPA)功能。 结果:基线特征具有可比性;患者的59.4%有中度哮喘和24.1%有严重的哮喘。所有的环索奈德剂量与基线更大的改善到12周FEV(1)%的预测与安慰剂有关(CIC40,11.97; CIC80,13.58,P <0.05; CIC160,14.17,P <0.01)。据报道哮喘症状(P <0.01),并减少使用沙丁胺醇改善显著。环索奈德耐受性良好,对HPA轴功能没有影响。 结论:在这个综合分析,环索奈德是有效且耐受性良好患儿持续性哮喘。

Primary study

Unclassified

期刊 Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology
Year 2005
Loading references information
背景:尽管他们证明疗效的治疗和预防哮喘发作,目前吸入皮质类固醇进行的安全问题,尤其是肾上腺抑制。环索奈德(氢氟烷推进剂)是一种新型的类固醇吸入很少,如果有的话,临床不良反应事件。目的:评价环索奈德治疗轻度至中度持续性哮喘的成年人连续低剂量和高刺激cosyntropin动态皮质醇反应的潜在影响。方法:这是一项双盲,随机,安慰剂对照,为期12周的研究在轻度至中度哮喘的成年人。一百六十名患者被随机和治疗; 148例患者完成了研究。卡松(氟氯化碳推进剂)被用来作为一个比较活跃。给药剂量的环索奈德320微克,每天一次,每天两次的环索奈德320微克,440微克氟替卡松丙,每日两次,所有剂量的执行器。结果:对于这两个环索奈德组,在低剂量和高平均峰值血清皮质醇水平的变化,并在24小时尿游离皮质醇水平纠正肌酐是小比基线和与安慰剂相媲美。卡松组,相较于安慰剂血清皮质醇水平显着减少在回应高剂量cosyntropin的刺激,在24小时尿游离皮质醇水平进行观察。口腔念珠菌病率分别为320微克/ð环索奈德,2.4%,2.5%,为640微克/ D环索奈德,和22.0%,为880微克/ð卡松。结论:这些发现证实了环索奈德治疗的安全,这表明,在剂量为640微克/ D,药物不会影响肾上腺皮质功能的敏感指标。

Primary study

Unclassified

期刊 Respiratory medicine
Year 2005
Loading references information
The efficacy and safety of ciclesonide was assessed in this randomized, placebo-controlled study in patients with persistent asthma (randomized n=360) maintained on low to moderate doses of inhaled corticosteroids. Patients were randomized to receive ciclesonide 80 or 320 microg (ex-actuator doses, equivalent to 100 and 400 microg ex-valve, respectively) or placebo once daily in the morning via metered-dose inhaler for 12 weeks. Morning peak expiratory flow was maintained throughout the treatment period in patients treated with ciclesonide and decreased significantly in patients treated with placebo (P=0.0003). Ciclesonide (80 and 320 microg) significantly increased forced expiratory volume in 1s from baseline (0.13 and 0.19 L increases, respectively; P<0.01); improvements were superior versus placebo (P=0.0044 for 80 microg ciclesonide; P<0.0001 for 320 microg ciclesonide). The probability of losing efficacy decreased in a dose-dependent manner (55% for placebo, 38% for ciclesonide 80 microg, 23% for ciclesonide 320 microg). Asthma symptom scores and rescue medication use were unchanged with ciclesonide and significantly worsened with placebo. The incidence of adverse events was comparable in all treatment groups and no cortisol suppression was observed. Therefore, ciclesonide 80 and 320 microg administered once daily was a safe and effective maintenance treatment for patients with persistent asthma.