BACKGROUND:

Breast is an uncommon location of lymphoma involvement. The most common type of primary breast lymphoma (PBL) is diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Rituximab is the widely used monoclonal antibody against CD20+ B-cell lymphoma, especially DLBCL. We aimed to analyze the clinical features, prognostic factors, and treatment outcome with or without rituximab in primary breast DLBCL.

METHODS:

We retrospectively analyzed patients diagnosed with PBL from October 1987 to March 2012 in our hospital, excluding metastasis by whole-body computed tomography and bone marrow study.

RESULTS:

Twenty-three patients were diagnosed with PBL. All were females. Eighteen patients were stage IE and five were stage IIE according to the Ann Arbor staging system. Two patients had lymphoma other than DLBCL. The median age of primary breast DLBCL patients was 48 years (range 27-79). Two were excluded from the analysis due to refusal or ineligibility for chemotherapy. No significant prognostic factor was found. Patients receiving chemotherapy with (RC) or without (C) rituximab were not significantly different in the 5-year overall survival (RC: 57.1%; C: 58.3%; p = 0.457) or progression-free survival (RC: 57.1%; C: 50.0%; p = 0.456). A high incidence of relapse in the central nervous system (CNS) (17.6%) was observed.

CONCLUSIONS:

In accordance with prior literature reports, our Taiwanese cohort of primary breast DLBCL seemed younger than those reported in Japan, Korea, and Western societies. Relapse in the CNS was not uncommon. The benefit of rituximab in addition to chemotherapy was not statistically significant. Treatment modality remained to be defined by further large-scale studies.

Objective. The aim of this study was to assess the risk of active tuberculosis (TB) in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases treated with biologics and tofacitinib in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and long-term extension (LTE) studies.Methods. A systematic review of the English-language literature by was performed by searching the Medline, Embase, Cochrane and Web of Knowledge databases. The search strategy focused on synonyms of diseases, biologics and tofacitinib. Data from RCTs were combined to assess the rate of TB using a random effects model. The incidence rate (IR) of TB and its association with disease, location and treatment were assessed in LTE studies.Results. The search captured 11 130 articles and abstracts. One-hundred RCTs (75 000 patients) and 63 LTE studies (80 774.45 patient-years) met the inclusion criteria. There were 31 TB cases with TNF inhibitors, 1 with abatacept and none with rituximab, tocilizumab, ustekinumab or tofacitinib. The odds ratio for TNF inhibitors was 1.92 (95% CI 0.91, 4.03, P = 0.085). In LTE studies, the IR of TB was >40/100 000 with tofacitinib and all biologics except rituximab. IR was higher in RA patients with anti-TNF monoclonal antibodies [307.71 (95% CI 184.79, 454.93)] than in those with rituximab [20.0 (95% CI 0.10, 60)] and etanercept [67.58 (95% CI 12.1, 163.94)] or AS, PsA and psoriasis with etanercept [60.01 (95% CI 3.6, 184.79)]. The IR of TB was higher in high-background TB areas.Conclusion. RCTs are not sensitive enough to assess the risk of reactivation of latent TB infection (LTBI). Disease, treatment and background TB rate are associated with different frequencies of active TB. The benefit/risk balance of preventing reactivation of LTBI in different backgrounds should be considered in clinical practice.

INTRODUCTION:

The purpose of this observational study was to analyze the rates, characteristics and associated risk factors of severe infections in patients with systemic autoimmune diseases (SAD) who were treated off-label with biological agents in daily practice.

METHODS:

The BIOGEAS registry is an ongoing Spanish prospective cohort study investigating the long-term safety and efficacy of the off-label use of biological agents in adult patients with severe, refractory SAD. Severe infections were defined according to previous studies as those that required intravenous treatment or that led to hospitalization or death. Patients contributed person-years of follow-up for the period in which they were treated with biological agents.

RESULTS:

A total of 344 patients with SAD treated with biological agents off-label were included in the Registry until July 2010. The first biological therapies included rituximab in 264 (77%) patients, infliximab in 37 (11%), etanercept in 21 (6%), adalimumab in 19 (5%), and 'other' agents in 3 (1%). Forty-five severe infections occurred in 37 patients after a mean follow-up of 26.76 months. These infections resulted in four deaths. The crude rate of severe infections was 90.9 events/1000 person-years (112.5 for rituximab, 76.9 for infliximab, 66.9 for adalimumab and 30.5 for etanercept respectively). In patients treated with more than two courses of rituximab, the crude rate of severe infection was 226.4 events/1000 person-years. A pathogen was identified in 24 (53%) severe infections. The most common sites of severe infection were the lower respiratory tract (39%), bacteremia/sepsis (20%) and the urinary tract (16%). There were no significant differences relating to gender, SAD, agent, other previous therapies, number of previous immunosuppressive agents received or other therapies administered concomitantly. Cox regression analysis showed that age (P = 0.015) was independently associated with an increased risk of severe infection. Survival curves showed a lower survival rate in patients with severe infections (log-rank and Breslow tests < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS:

The rates of severe infections in SAD patients with severe, refractory disease treated depended on the biological agent used, with the highest rates being observed for rituximab and the lowest for etanercept. The rate of infection was especially high in patients receiving three or more courses of rituximab. In patients with severe infections, survival was significantly reduced. Older age was the only significant predictive factor of severe infection.

PURPOSE:

R-CHOP (rituximab with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone) and R-CVP (rituximab with cyclophosphamide, vincristine and prednisone) have both been used successfully in the treatment of patients with symptomatic follicular lymphoma (FL). No study has compared the efficacy of the two treatment modalities and attempted to evaluate the role of anthracyclines in the management of patients with FL. We conducted a meta-analysis of relevant literature comparing the two treatment arms for FL with response being the final endpoint.

PATIENTS AND METHODS:

TWO ANALYSES WERE CONDUCTED:

The first analysis compared R-CHOP to R-CVP as frontline agents for the treatment of FL, and the second analysis included both untreated and relapsed patients.

RESULTS:

For both studies, R-CVP was superior to R-CHOP when evaluating for complete response (CR). Odds ratios were 2.86 (95% CI, 1.81-4.51) in the first analysis and 1.48 (95% CI, 0.991-2.22) in the second analysis. However for overall response (CR+Partial response, PR), R-CHOP was superior, with odds ratios of 5.45 (95% CI.: 2.51 - 11.83) and 5.54 (95% CI.: 2.69 - 11.40), for the first and second analyses, respectively.

CONCLUSION:

R-CHOP and R-CVP protocols achieve excellent overall response. In patients with known cardiac history, omission of anthracyclines is reasonable and R-CVP provides a competitive CR rate. In younger patients with FL where cumulative cardio-toxicity may be of importance in the long term and in whom future stem cell transplantation is an option, again R-CVP may be a more appealing option.

Non-Hodgkin lymphomas are among the most prevalent hematologic malignancies. Although the addition of rituximab (R) to chemotherapy has made a big impact in the treatment of B cell lymphomas, most of them are not cured yet. The panorama in natural killer/T cell lymphomas is more unsatisfactory, thus representing a group of diseases where effective therapies constitute an urgent medical need. In recent years, several new antineoplastic agents have been tested in clinical trials showing promising results. The aim of this review is to update information of these studies that are already changing the scenario of the treatment of patients with Non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

Background: A limited evidence exists regarding comparisons of clinical effectiveness of available therapies for first-line treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Methods: We compared available therapies for treatment-naive, symptomatic CLL regarding progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in all the identified random control trials and in subgroups composed of younger/fit and older/unfit patients, using a Bayesian network meta-analysis. Results: In younger/fit patients we obtained median of projected mean PFS of: 19, 26, 31, 43, 51 and 75. months for chlorambucil, fludarabine, alemtuzumab, fludarabine with cyclophosphamide (FC), bendamustine and fludarabine with cyclophosphamide and rituximab (FCR), respectively. We noted median OS of: 59, 66, 66, 70. months for FC, chlorambucil, FCR and fludarabine, respectively. In older/unfit patients we noted PFS of: 16, 17, 24, 30, 60. months for chlorambucil, fludarabine and chlorambucil with ofatumumab (OClb) or rituximab (RClb) or obinutuzumab (GClb), respectively. We obtained median OS of: 44, 58, 59 and 90. months for fludarabine, RClb, chlorambucil and GClb, respectively. Conclusions: Our results suggest that: (1) FCR has higher potential of preventing CLL progression in younger/fit patients over four therapy options, which were subject of previous meta-analysis but also over bendamustine; (2) in these patients FCR does not entail prolonging of OS in comparison with chlorambucil and it is outperformed by fludarabine; (3) in older/unfit patients GClb demonstrates longer projected PFS than all assessed comparators; (4) in this group GClb has also the highest potential of increasing OS.

OBJETIVO:

Las recaídas y el fracaso son frecuentes en los pacientes con vasculitis sistémica (VS). Los agentes biológicos se han prescrito como tratamiento de rescate. El objetivo de esta revisión sistemática es analizar la evidencia actual sobre el uso terapéutico de agentes biológicos para la VS.

MÉTODOS:

Se buscó en MEDLINE, EMBASE, Base de Datos Cochrane de Revisiones Sistemáticas y el Registro Cochrane Central de Ensayos Controlados hasta fines de abril de 2013. Fueron incluídas revisiones sistemáticas y metanálisis, ensayos clínicos, estudios de cohortes y series de casos con más de 3 pacientes. La revisión de los artículos fue realizada de forma indepediente por dos investigadores y se realizaron consensos ante las discrepancias.

RESULTADOS:

De las 3.447 citas, resúmenes y de las búsquedas manuales de los estudios examinados, se incluyeron 90. La mayoría de los estudios incluyeron pacientes con vasculitis asociada a ANCA (VAA) y sólo unos pocos incluyen pacientes con vasculitis de grandes vasos (VGV). El agente más utilizado fue Rituximab, con eficacia demostrada para la inducción de la remisión en pacientes con VAA. Una serie de estudios utilizó diferentes agentes anti-TNF con diversos resultados. Se encontraron unos pocos estudios no controlados sobre el uso de abatacept, alemtuzumab, mepolizumab y tocilizumab.

CONCLUSIÓN:

La evidencia actual sobre el uso de terapias biológicas para la VS se basa principalmente en datos observacionales no controlados. Rituximab no es inferior a la ciclofosfamida para la inducción de la remisión en la VAA y podría ser superior en la enfermedad recurrente. El infliximab y adalimumab son eficaces como agentes ahorradores de esteroides. El etanercept no es eficaz para mantener la remisión en pacientes con granulomatosis con poliangiitis y han sido reportados efectos adversos graves durante el tratamiento. Para la VGV, tanto infliximab y etanercept tuvieron un rol como agentes ahorradores de esteroides y tocilizumab podría ser eficaz también para la inducción de la remisión en la VGV.

OBJECTIVES:

Our goal was to determine long-term efficacy and safety of B-cell-depletion therapy for children with autoimmune thrombocytopenia and autoimmune hemolytic anemia in pediatric systemic lupus erythematosus.

PATIENTS AND METHODS:

A retrospective, single-center cohort study was conducted including all patients with pediatric systemic lupus erythematosus who were diagnosed with autoimmune thrombocytopenia and/or autoimmune hemolytic anemia and treated with rituximab. Treatment efficacy and safety parameters were monitored and recorded.

RESULTS:

Nine patients with pediatric systemic lupus erythematosus were included in the study: 5 had autoimmune thrombocytopenia, 3 had autoimmune hemolytic anemia, and 1 had both. There were 5 female and 4 male patients; median age at diagnosis of pediatric systemic lupus erythematosus was 14 years (range: 8-16 years); and median pediatric systemic lupus erythematosus disease duration to time of rituximab treatment was 6 months (range: 2-30 months). Complete response was achieved in all 6 children with autoimmune thrombocytopenia (median time to complete response: 2 weeks [range: 1-12 weeks]). Two patients' conditions flared at 48 and 68 weeks, respectively, and were re-treated. The remaining 4 patients continued to be in remission at 24, 32, 36, and 88 weeks, respectively. All 4 children with autoimmune hemolytic anemia achieved complete response at a median time of 4 weeks (range: 4-32 weeks). All patients remained in complete response at 24, 44, 84, and 100 weeks of follow-up. Complete B-cell depletion was seen in all children after rituximab treatment. No serious infections occurred, but 1 patient had an infusion reaction.

CONCLUSIONS:

Preliminary evidence suggests that B-cell-depletion therapy with rituximab is an efficacious and safe treatment for autoimmune thrombocytopenia and autoimmune hemolytic anemia in pediatric systemic lupus erythematosus. Despite the prolonged effect on B-cell numbers and function, no serious infections were observed.

In 2006, the Study Group on Autoimmune Diseases (GEAS) of the Spanish Society of Internal Medicine created the BIOGEAS project, a multicenter study devoted to collecting data on the use of biological agents in adult patients with systemic autoimmune diseases (SAD). The information source is a periodic surveillance of reported cases by a MEDLINE search (last update before this writing: December 31, 2007). The analysis included a total of 19 SAD and 6 biological agents. By December 31, 2007, the Registry included 1370 patients with SAD who had been treated with biological agents (562 received infliximab, 463 rituximab, 285 etanercept, 42 anakinra, and 18 adalimumab). SAD included Sjögren syndrome (SS; 215 cases), Wegener granulomatosis (261 cases), sarcoidosis (219 cases), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE; 172 cases), Behçet disease (173 cases), adult-onset Still disease (118 cases), cryoglobulinemia (88 cases), and other diseases (80 cases). The higher rate of therapeutic response was found for the use of rituximab in patients with SLE (90%), SS (91%), antiphospholipid syndrome (92%), and cryoglobulinemia (87%); infliximab in sarcoidosis (99%), adult-onset Still disease (90%), and polychondritis (86%); and etanercept in Behçet disease (96%). Results from controlled trials showed lack of efficacy for the use of infliximab in SS and etanercept in SS, Wegener granulomatosis, and sarcoidosis. In addition, an excess of side effects (>50% of reported cases) was observed for the use of infliximab in inflammatory myopathies and sarcoidosis, and for the use of etanercept in polymyositis. Sufficient data are not yet available to evaluate fully the efficacy and safety of adalimumab and anakinra in patients with SAD. In conclusion, current scientific evidence on the use of biological therapies in patients with SAD is mainly based on uncontrolled, observational data. The best results have been observed in the use of rituximab for SS, SLE, and cryoglobulinemia; infliximab for sarcoidosis and adult-onset Still disease; and etanercept for Behçet disease. Lack of efficacy was demonstrated for infliximab and etanercept in SS, for etanercept in Wegener granulomatosis and sarcoidosis, and for anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) in SS. Future controlled trials are needed to confirm the potential use of biological therapies in patients with SAD.

PURPOSE:

To evaluate 3'-deoxy-3'-[(18)F]fluorothymidine-positron emission tomography (FLT-PET) for early monitoring response of high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma to treatment with cyclophosphamide-adriamycin-vincristine-prednisone chemotherapy with or without rituximab immunotherapy (R-CHOP/CHOP).

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN:

Twenty-two patients with histologically proven high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma scheduled to undergo first line treatment with R-CHOP/CHOP were included. All patients received baseline imaging before therapy with FLT-PET. For noninvasive assessment of treatment response, FLT-PET was repeated at following time points: group 1 (n = 6), 1 and 6 weeks after R-CHOP/CHOP; group 2 (n = 16), 2 days after rituximab and 2 days after CHOP application. Emission images were acquired 45 min after injection of 300 to 370 MBq of FLT. FLT uptake was quantified by region-of-interest technique on a lesion basis. Maximum standardized uptake values (SUV) for FLT were calculated using circular region of interest (diameter, 1.5 cm).

RESULTS:

In all patients, morphologically proven lesions showed initially high FLT uptake (mean SUV, 8.1 +/- 3.9). In group 1, mean FLT SUV decreased 7 days after R-CHOP/CHOP by 77% (P < 0.001), the reduction in FLT SUV from baseline was 85% after 40 days (P = 0.003). In group 2, FLT uptake in patients without dexamethasone pretreatment revealed no significant reduction after rituximab (P = 0.3) but significantly decreased 2 days after CHOP to 32% compared with the baseline value (P = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS:

Administration of R-CHOP/CHOP is associated with an early decrease in lymphoma FLT uptake. Interestingly, there was no reduction of FLT uptake after rituximab alone, indicating no early antiproliferative effect of immunotherapy. FLT-PET seems to be promising for early evaluation of drug effects in lymphoma.